SJ Bills backer Posted December 9, 2004 Posted December 9, 2004 Check this link for a news story that's earned WAY too much attention this week. http://www.craigslist.org/sfc/com/51679558.html There's plenty of other links to this story, each with their own bias, and this one represented the closest to the truth that I can see. I feel like I have a stake in this as my CHILDREN both attend this school, and I find all this attention, media crews, and interested 3rd parties are EXTREMELY disruptive to my kids LEARNING in school. As for the teacher, anecdotal evidence I've heard from parents who's children have been in his class is that he uses his position to push christianity when he can. While religion has its place in the founding of the country and "In God we trust" and the Pledge, I can't help but feel that he should focus on TEACHING HISTORY and leave the 5th graders out of a nuanced discussion of the overlap between church and state. As for academic freedom, while a prof or teacher can certainly express their opinions in class, the idea is to keep their focus on the subject at hand. In the end, it appears that larger organizations are focusing on this as a cause celebre, and the unfortunate media circus and attention will continue. I welcome any input from other interested parties.
_BiB_ Posted December 9, 2004 Posted December 9, 2004 The Land of the Agenda. That's a hard one. If this teacher were promoting gay rights, or protesting the governments intervention in a sovreign nation, in the SF locale, no one would have blinked an eye. Best I can come up with is ride it out for a week. It will be gone. Christianity has a huge part in the formation of this country, whether anyone likes it or not. It's only been over the last 30-40 years that anyone had an issue with it. Especially the last twenty. I would suspect that your children have already been exposed to a lot of ideology. This garners attention because it's not your geographic nor local geopolitical mainstream. Kids bounce well. A week of distraction won't hurt them much. Whatever YOU believe is what they will learn. Or, did I miss the point?
RkFast Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 MY 5th grade teacher pushed religion. He was a devout Mormon. Read the Bible right in class to himself when we were taking tests. Quoted the Bible to US...but simple stuff like the 10 Commandments only. A few other things like that. BEST teacher I had in Elementary School. And 95% of the other kids loved him too. Overall, Im not for such talk from teachers. But the fact that "progressive" issues are free andclear to discuss to kids of any age now and the mere mention of religion is seen as some affront to our being and some kind of attempt at indoctrination is beyond absurd.
swede316 Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 Religion is an important part of American history...Didn't the Pilgrams leave England to avoid religious pursacution? That said......we have a right to the pursuit of happiness and a seperation of church and state........which one weighs more? My personal view....you have to use common sense...YES...common sense...We are becoming too divided.......Things worked great in 60's and 70's and even the 80's........Too many activists want to divide this country into their views and use the Constitution against us ..... We all have the right tobelieve what we believe.....The common sense approach is.....Say what you want...Believe what you want...........but don't try and impose your views on me. Now for you tools .... That says 1 nation under god....is offesnsive... #1 god is ambuigious... could be allah...could be Jesus....could be Buddha...For u Athesists...You can't believe in some thing you don't believe in...So WTF is the problem people?
RkFast Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 The thing is, swede...even the MENTION and acknowledgement of religion is considered "pushing" and "offensive" by many these days. Sad.
Terry Tate Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 Check this link for a news story that's earned WAY too much attention this week. http://www.craigslist.org/sfc/com/51679558.html There's plenty of other links to this story, each with their own bias, and this one represented the closest to the truth that I can see. I feel like I have a stake in this as my CHILDREN both attend this school, and I find all this attention, media crews, and interested 3rd parties are EXTREMELY disruptive to my kids LEARNING in school. As for the teacher, anecdotal evidence I've heard from parents who's children have been in his class is that he uses his position to push christianity when he can. While religion has its place in the founding of the country and "In God we trust" and the Pledge, I can't help but feel that he should focus on TEACHING HISTORY and leave the 5th graders out of a nuanced discussion of the overlap between church and state. As for academic freedom, while a prof or teacher can certainly express their opinions in class, the idea is to keep their focus on the subject at hand. In the end, it appears that larger organizations are focusing on this as a cause celebre, and the unfortunate media circus and attention will continue. I welcome any input from other interested parties. 154183[/snapback] This was discussed when the story originally broke. You appear to have a good grasp of the situation - there are definitely some pitchfork-wielding agenda pushers involved. From what I read, the teacher appears to be out of line (how much, I don't know), and the school/parents are probably overreacting a bit, but not that it should cause any harm to anyone. It's unfortunate the school and your kids have something to distract them from the task at hand, but it should blow over eventually, and you sound like you understand the situation well enough that you and your kids can stay focused during the circus. Best of luck.
Mickey Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 The Land of the Agenda. That's a hard one. If this teacher were promoting gay rights, or protesting the governments intervention in a sovreign nation, in the SF locale, no one would have blinked an eye. Best I can come up with is ride it out for a week. It will be gone. Christianity has a huge part in the formation of this country, whether anyone likes it or not. It's only been over the last 30-40 years that anyone had an issue with it. Especially the last twenty. I would suspect that your children have already been exposed to a lot of ideology. This garners attention because it's not your geographic nor local geopolitical mainstream. Kids bounce well. A week of distraction won't hurt them much. Whatever YOU believe is what they will learn. Or, did I miss the point? 154207[/snapback] Pleez bib, if they were pushing gay rights they would have been fired (Gay teacher fired another gay teacher fired non gay teacher fired just for assinging a book that had a gay character non gay teacher fired for teaching about homophobia (sues and wins) gay teacher fired Some sue and win, some lose but most just try and start over. This imagined persecution of Christians on the part of some in the US is beyond delusional. I think it is impractical to focus too much on religion in history classes in public schools. Should the negative history of religions also be covered? How would a parent react to a lecture in class on the role christians have played in anti-semitism throughout history or the number of pedophilic Catholic priests? If you give a lecture on Muslims where do you start, with peaceful passages from the Koran or suicidal jihadists? Should they talk about how some Christians let their children die rather than receive life saving medical treatment? I don't mean to suggest that the history of christianity or any other faith on the whole has been anything other than benign but certainly, it has not been exclusively so. How would you like to have to sit through that school board meeting. Yikes. I think that stuff is better saved for College, too much of an opportunity for people to play out their agendas one way or the other. At that age, presumably you are dealing with young adults who can decide for themselves what they want to learn and sort out the different agendas.
Terry Tate Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 Pleez bib, if they were pushing gay rights they would have been fired (Gay teacher fired another gay teacher fired non gay teacher fired just for assinging a book that had a gay character non gay teacher fired for teaching about homophobia (sues and wins) gay teacher fired Some sue and win, some lose but most just try and start over. This imagined persecution of Christians on the part of some in the US is beyond delusional. 154715[/snapback] I tend to agree with the overall post, but there were two places you're off base: 1) the examples you give here are misguided. BiB stated in the SF area - the one you listed that was in the area the teacher won a $1.15 million lawsuit, so I guess you could say he was vindicated, in a lightning strike, lottery jackpot sort of way. 2) persecution is not imagined when it's you. For example, there's a poster here who sometimes makes unkind statements, and repeatedly justifies it by complaining he is being called names by everyone who disagrees with him, and cites a rollcall of extreme pundits and radio talk show hosts - is he too, delusional? Mostly kidding about #2 - but not totally.
Mickey Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 I tend to agree with the overall post, but there were two places you're off base: 1) the examples you give here are misguided. BiB stated in the SF area - the one you listed that was in the area the teacher won a $1.15 million lawsuit, so I guess you could say he was vindicated, in a lightning strike, lottery jackpot sort of way. 2) persecution is not imagined when it's you. For example, there's a poster here who sometimes makes unkind statements, and repeatedly justifies it by complaining he is being called names by everyone who disagrees with him, and cites a rollcall of extreme pundits and radio talk show hosts - is he too, delusional? Mostly kidding about #2 - but not totally. 154738[/snapback] The teacher did get fired though despite the later victory in court. As I said, some win, some lose, most don't sue but just pick up the pieces. Believe me, I didn't list anywhere near all the links I found easily to fired teachers. This is real, it really happens. As for persecution in general, I agree, even if its one it is too much and certainly to that person, it is waaaay too much. My point on supposed christian persecution in the US is in a larger sense. It isn't some national crisis the idea that it is, is in fact delusional. Bib probably didn't mean it that way but I have been running across that assertion all the time. You know, the "why can't we have a nativity scene" thing. As for "unkind statments" I believe I have only made those in response to the same from others or in discussing things with those who, by well known rep around here, traffic exclusively in that kind of rhetoric. I regret having done otherwise if that is the case. Take a look at the exchange between me and AKC in the "role of women" thread. Tell me who went over the top first. I'll even suggest a pass on his first "unkind statement" that Kerry's wives were "lunatics".
_BiB_ Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 I wasn't bringing gay anything into this at all, in terms of the subject. There are certain areas of the US that are liberal to the point of embarrasment sometimes, and SF is one of them. I'm not knocking the place, the opposite can be said of most of the rest of the US. When it comes time for certain issues, like religion vs government, certain areas seem to offer up the majority of the cases.
Mickey Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 I wasn't bringing gay anything into this at all, in terms of the subject. There are certain areas of the US that are liberal to the point of embarrasment sometimes, and SF is one of them. I'm not knocking the place, the opposite can be said of most of the rest of the US. When it comes time for certain issues, like religion vs government, certain areas seem to offer up the majority of the cases. 154804[/snapback] Maybe we should just throw some velvet ropes around those areas, charge admission and save oursleves all that indignant strutting, right and left.
Simon Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 I feel like I have a stake in this as my CHILDREN both attend this school, and I find all this attention, media crews, and interested 3rd parties are EXTREMELY disruptive to my kids LEARNING in school. That sounds pretty annoying. Maybe your best bet is to see if you can turn the event itself into a sort of learning experience for your kids. Depending on how old they are there's probably some real wisdom to be had re: politics, the media, faith and education. Cya
Terry Tate Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 Take a look at the exchange between me and AKC in the "role of women" thread. Tell me who went over the top first. I'll even suggest a pass on his first "unkind statement" that Kerry's wives were "lunatics". 154787[/snapback] I found the whole first lady thread preposterous, but just in case, I still stand by my recommendation to Democrats to nominate Carl Dean (Dolly Parton's husband). No question there is poor manners exhibited by many; I try to look at it as poor debating technique rather than focus on the insults. It's extremely difficult to remain civil when debating a topic you feel strongly about, especially when you're being insulted at the same time, and I'm sure I've made the same errors at some point. But as Jules says in Pulp Fiction, "... I'm tryin', Ringo. I'm tryin' real hard to be a shepherd. "
Grant Posted December 12, 2004 Posted December 12, 2004 Christianity has a huge part in the formation of this country, whether anyone likes it or not. 154207[/snapback] So was slavery. What's your point?
Adam Posted December 12, 2004 Posted December 12, 2004 History is all a matter of the context you put it in- you could take some of the most heroic figures in history, and portray them as demonic- and some of the greatest villains and make them look heroic. I think religion has a very stong place in the teaching of history- it helps define which side is right and wrong- which may be very different to different groups. AND, it isnt wrong to view the same thing from differing perspectives.
Britbillsfan Posted December 12, 2004 Posted December 12, 2004 History is all a matter of the context you put it in- you could take some of the most heroic figures in history, and portray them as demonic- and some of the greatest villains and make them look heroic. I think religion has a very stong place in the teaching of history- it helps define which side is right and wrong- which may be very different to different groups. AND, it isnt wrong to view the same thing from differing perspectives. 156214[/snapback] Religion has a huge part in the history of the world, but far less in America than the 'old world' (no 'religious' wars, for example). You are right about context. I think it is quite common for thugs and murderers to become mythologised in many nations, and the view of more important figures can likewise be exaggerated one way or another (after all history is written by the victor). One of life's small ironies is that in the UK we do teach religion in schools yet we are not a religious culture/people (50% agnostics/atheists approx, most people do not worship even if they see themselves as Christian, etc) whilst in America you are far more religious as a people/culture but religion is not taught.
_BiB_ Posted December 12, 2004 Posted December 12, 2004 So was slavery. What's your point? 156191[/snapback] The original precepts included some form of moral compass along with stressing tolerance. Separation of Church and State is a fabrication, legislated from the bench-not through the people. What was laid as groundwork was the concept that the United States would not have a state mandated or sponsored central religion. A great many of the original settlers to the US came to escape religious persecution elsewhere, and this was taken into account. The basic "laws" be it may generated from the founding of this nation are based heavily in the Judeo-Christian ethic. How many laws are spawned by something as simple as the 10 Commandments? This nation has lost it's moral compass. The emphasis in no longer on what's right for a society, it is now on what is right for the individual, basically on an individual basis. Virtually every vocal minority can now attack and succeed in tearing down institutions and ideals practiced for centuries in the name of "Civil Liberty"and "Progress". We now live in a land where as far as many people are concerned, technology and entertainment are God, and they worship little more than themselves. They appear to be in the minority, but they also get the airtime and the press. Eventually, more people will be indoctrinated that this is the way that things ought to be and we will will suffer for it. We're suffering for it already.
RuntheDamnBall Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 The original precepts included some form of moral compass along with stressing tolerance. Separation of Church and State is a fabrication, legislated from the bench-not through the people. What was laid as groundwork was the concept that the United States would not have a state mandated or sponsored central religion. A great many of the original settlers to the US came to escape religious persecution elsewhere, and this was taken into account. The basic "laws" be it may generated from the founding of this nation are based heavily in the Judeo-Christian ethic. How many laws are spawned by something as simple as the 10 Commandments? 156541[/snapback] Would this be assuming the ethics of the ten commandments are independent or belonging only to the Judeo-Christian theology? Also, what do you make of the fact that a great many of the "original" settlers in the U.S., who came to practice their own religion, and their ancestors, pretty much proceeded to wipe out the culture and population of the land's actual original inhabitants? The notion of an American purity rooted in the ideals of white settlers borders on laughable.
_BiB_ Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 Would this be assuming the ethics of the ten commandments are independent or belonging only to the Judeo-Christian theology? Also, what do you make of the fact that a great many of the "original" settlers in the U.S., who came to practice their own religion, and their ancestors, pretty much proceeded to wipe out the culture and population of the land's actual original inhabitants? The notion of an American purity rooted in the ideals of white settlers borders on laughable. 157847[/snapback] OK. Laugh at me. I've posted before where that was wrong, as for all the atrocities we committed. I'm also personally responsible for none of it. All the more reason to have absolutely no morals or scruples now. Two wrongs after all, will always make a right. We had slavery, we screwed the Indians. That gives me every right to be a dick now, in 2004.
RkFast Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 Also, what do you make of the fact that a great many of the "original" settlers in the U.S., who came to practice their own religion, and their ancestors, pretty much proceeded to wipe out the culture and population of the land's actual original inhabitants? The notion of an American purity rooted in the ideals of white settlers borders on laughable. So are you saying that America itself or just the idea of American "moralism" is a fraud? More tripe from the "Blame America First" Mindset. And they wonder why people call them Anti-American.
Recommended Posts