Nanker Posted November 18, 2010 Posted November 18, 2010 To paraphrase Meatloaf, "One out of 285 ain't bad". What a stunningly FUBAR Justice Department we have.
Nanker Posted November 18, 2010 Author Posted November 18, 2010 Whatever, sounds like they're not likely to try KSM in the States now. If you've lost USA Today, you've lost middle America.
1billsfan Posted November 18, 2010 Posted November 18, 2010 So how exactly does Holder still have his job? How do the democrats still elect Nancy Pelosi their house minority leader after their rejection and epic slaughter in the 2010 elections? My guess is it's the "don't touch the junk" strategy.
Gary M Posted November 18, 2010 Posted November 18, 2010 So how exactly does Holder still have his job? How do the democrats still elect Nancy Pelosi their house minority leader after their rejection and epic slaughter in the 2010 elections? My guess is it's the "don't touch the junk" strategy. Ignorance is bliss?
OCinBuffalo Posted November 19, 2010 Posted November 19, 2010 (edited) Ignorance is bliss? This is not ignorance. This is stupidity, because they are choosing these actions despite being very well informed of their outcomes. Edited November 19, 2010 by OCinBuffalo
ChiGoose Posted July 23, 2022 Posted July 23, 2022 Wrong. DoJ didn’t indict Eric Holder because he had executive privilege. DoJ did indict Steve Bannon because he didn’t. Why did the DoJ decline to indict on the Jan 6 committee’s referrals for Dan Scavino and Mark Meadows?
Recommended Posts