Bob in STL Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 Right now Perry Fewell is a hot commodity in the NFL. He is the rising star young coordinator. Perry Fewell did an excellent job last year as interim head coach. He gave the ball to Fitz. They won a few games. The defense was opportunistic. They played hard for him right to the end. When the season ended Fewell he was given the obligatory look as HC and then the Bills moved on. Who would have been happy if the Bills named him as HC? Be honest. I know I was looking for the big name (for me it was Cowher or Gruden or Marty S).
muffmonster Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 Right now Perry Fewell is a hot commodity in the NFL. He is the rising star young coordinator. Perry Fewell did an excellent job last year as interim head coach. He gave the ball to Fitz. They won a few games. The defense was opportunistic. They played hard for him right to the end. When the season ended Fewell he was given the obligatory look as HC and then the Bills moved on. Who would have been happy if the Bills named him as HC? Be honest. I know I was looking for the big name (for me it was Cowher or Gruden or Marty S). With hindsight I think I'd be happy with Fewell as the HC, if they brought in a good offensive coordinator (like Gailey). That being said I was like you and wanted the big name coach, so i would have been disappointed that they stuck with Fewell.
DrDawkinstein Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 (edited) Contrary to what anyone will post, the city would have burnt the Ralph down had they just hired from within. Furthermore, for 4 years, we all sat here and watched people B word about our soft defense, and what a horrible scheme it was. Every career in the NFL is situational. Just because Fewell is having success in NY (with a TON more talent) doesnt necessarily mean that he would have been successful anywhere else this year. Edited November 9, 2010 by DrDankenstein
Buftex Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 At the time, I wanted Shanahan or Marty Schottenheimer...but of the realistic candidates, Fewell was my first pick.
lets_go_bills Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 I wanted Cowher. I also liked Martyball. I felt if we were going to go the co-ordinator route, it would be Frazier. While Fewell was good and is having a great year, if we had promoted him, everyone would've been upset. We all wanted to bring someone in from the outside, move away from the Jauron-era. Fewell was part of that era. I liked him and his defense (I'm a fan of the Cover2), but we needed a change, not another promotion from within. Anybody who says we should've kept Fewell and that they wanted him as HC is lying. We can be happy for him and wish him well, but let's not kid ourselves, we all wanted to move as far away from the Jauron stench as possible.
KOKBILLS Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 I wanted Cowher or Shanny and I wanted nothing to do with Fewell...I still feel the same way...He's a decent DC...Even better with good talent...I just don't think he's HC material yet...I will admit though that, at least right now, I'm not sure he would have been a worse choice than Gailey...We'll see how that whole thing plays out...
Kkspike Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 I wanted Bruce coslet or Wayne fontes.Matt millen,Tom flories.Barry switzer,herm Edwards.
zow2 Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 Not ONE person on this board would have been happy if they hired Fewell as HC. In hindsight he looks good b/c the Giants have a very good D-line and talent on D. We all knew we needed an offensive coach and Gailey has gotten the O to look good at times. That being said, the team needs to move on from Edwards at the end of the season. NObody else in the NFL would have hired that guy as D-coordinator.
tennesseeboy Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 I predicted Fewell as a head coach when he left and wanted him. People pooh-poohed my assertion that he was a good prospect for head coach AT THE TIME. I was not happy with the Gailey pick...at the time.
mikey98277 Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 Our problem was the offense and Chan has fixed that, Our problem now is Edwards on D, once we get that fixed we should be on the way to better times.
1B4IDie Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 The way the team played under Fewell I thought there was a possibility that he would end up being the HC. Honestly I started rationalizing Fewell as the HC and thought, could be worse. I wasn't going to burn OBD down, but was hoping they could could get a nice OC. Well that ship has sailed. If the Bills have proven anything the last ten years, they have proven that former Buffalo Bill HCs make outstanding Coordinators.
bigskyfan Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 I remember posting that I would be ok with Perry Fewell as HC, provided the front office was cleaned out and we got a new name GM, who would then hire a whole new scouting department. CG is our 4th head coach with a losing record, and management and scouting doesn't change. What does that tell you about where the problems lie?
NaPolian8693 Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 No one wanted Fewell. If you say you wanted Fewell as your top choice, you are a liar. Everyone wanted Cowher or Shanahan or Gruden or someone good. We could have had Schottenheimer. Instead we got crusty old Chan. That's Buffalo.
May Day 10 Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 I didnt want them to hire Fewell. If given the choice of him or Gailey I would have chosen Fewell
ricojes Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 (edited) Right now Perry Fewell is a hot commodity in the NFL. He is the rising star young coordinator. Perry Fewell did an excellent job last year as interim head coach. He gave the ball to Fitz. They won a few games. The defense was opportunistic. They played hard for him right to the end. When the season ended Fewell he was given the obligatory look as HC and then the Bills moved on. Who would have been happy if the Bills named him as HC? Be honest. I know I was looking for the big name (for me it was Cowher or Gruden or Marty S). Either way it doesn't change the talent on the field. I did like Fewell. I liked his energy and I like the way the guys played for him. But they are playing very hard for Chan, there is just not enough talent. Edited November 9, 2010 by ricojes
coldstorage5 Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 Right now Perry Fewell is a hot commodity in the NFL. He is the rising star young coordinator. Perry Fewell did an excellent job last year as interim head coach. He gave the ball to Fitz. They won a few games. The defense was opportunistic. They played hard for him right to the end. When the season ended Fewell he was given the obligatory look as HC and then the Bills moved on. Who would have been happy if the Bills named him as HC? Be honest. I know I was looking for the big name (for me it was Cowher or Gruden or Marty S). I said it before, Perry wasnt Hired,becuase he was Black. We all know this is True. Its not Like Gailey Was a Hot Coach.Same Old Bills, Close,Good Try...OT..They Came Close. You are What Record is 0-8.
PromoTheRobot Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 Right now Perry Fewell is a hot commodity in the NFL. He is the rising star young coordinator. Perry Fewell did an excellent job last year as interim head coach. He gave the ball to Fitz. They won a few games. The defense was opportunistic. They played hard for him right to the end. When the season ended Fewell he was given the obligatory look as HC and then the Bills moved on. Who would have been happy if the Bills named him as HC? Be honest. I know I was looking for the big name (for me it was Cowher or Gruden or Marty S). Did you forget, or are you ignoring the fact that nobody...N-O-B-O-D-Y...wanted to consider Fewell because he had the stink of Dick(less) Jauron on him. No one cared that the Bills played better under him. I clearly recall the complaints: can't game plan...can't manage the clock...gotta clean house...yada yada yada! I personally took plenty of grief for having the gall to suggest Fewell might be worth keeping. The all-knowing Stadium Wall spoke and they declared Perry Fewell a failure. Case closed. PTR I remember posting that I would be ok with Perry Fewell as HC, provided the front office was cleaned out and we got a new name GM, who would then hire a whole new scouting department. CG is our 4th head coach with a losing record, and management and scouting doesn't change. What does that tell you about where the problems lie? Chan has a winning record as a head coach in the NFL, but why quibble? PTR
coldstorage5 Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 Chan has a winning record as a head coach in the NFL, but why quibble? PTR Not Any More...18-14 + 0-8 = 18-22.
jr1 Posted November 9, 2010 Posted November 9, 2010 Our running game, defense & special teams were better under Perry
Bob in STL Posted November 9, 2010 Author Posted November 9, 2010 Contrary to what anyone will post, the city would have burnt the Ralph down had they just hired from within. Furthermore, for 4 years, we all sat here and watched people B word about our soft defense, and what a horrible scheme it was. Every career in the NFL is situational. Just because Fewell is having success in NY (with a TON more talent) doesnt necessarily mean that he would have been successful anywhere else this year. I agree. It sure does look like he has a way of motivating players though.
Recommended Posts