zow2 Posted November 7, 2010 Posted November 7, 2010 I kept reading last week on here and from media people that we are destined to be 2-14 or 3-13. Well folks, the Bears game was probably the easiest game left on the schedule. Detroit imo, is better tha Chicago, definitely have better playmakers on O and with Stafford very dangerous. Suh is a stud and their D-line is better than our O-line. Cleveland wiped out New Eng and N. Orleans this year. Their D is legit. Detroit and CLeve are probably losses. Jets, Miami, Pats, Steelers and even Vikings in their house would all be big upsets. I guess Cinci might be the best shot for a W since we have owned them the lat 8 or 9 meetings.
Erik Posted November 7, 2010 Posted November 7, 2010 I kept reading last week on here and from media people that we are destined to be 2-14 or 3-13. Well folks, the Bears game was probably the easiest game left on the schedule. Detroit imo, is better tha Chicago, definitely have better playmakers on O and with Stafford very dangerous. Suh is a stud and their D-line is better than our O-line. Cleveland wiped out New Eng and N. Orleans this year. Their D is legit. Detroit and CLeve are probably losses. Jets, Miami, Pats, Steelers and even Vikings in their house would all be big upsets. I guess Cinci might be the best shot for a W since we have owned them the lat 8 or 9 meetings. We've lost by three the last three games to three teams who might be playing in the playoffs. Stafford went out with an injury today, if we misses the game next week I love our chances.
Chilly Posted November 7, 2010 Posted November 7, 2010 We've lost by three the last three games to three teams who might be playing in the playoffs. Stafford went out with an injury today, if we misses the game next week I love our chances. While I think they'll likely get a win or two, I can't see how you would ever "love" the chances of this team to win. In addition, I'm not sure how you'd EVER call Chicago a potential playoff-caliber team.
BuffaloBillsMagic1 Posted November 8, 2010 Posted November 8, 2010 Detroit and Cincinnati are 2 possibel wins IMO
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted November 8, 2010 Posted November 8, 2010 dude chill... there are 8 games left on the schedule. the odds of the bills being winless are so slim
Mr. WEO Posted November 8, 2010 Posted November 8, 2010 (edited) dude chill... there are 8 games left on the schedule. the odds of the bills being winless are so slim What were your odds of them being 0-8 to this point? Edited November 8, 2010 by Mr. WEO
Since 1972 Posted November 8, 2010 Posted November 8, 2010 dude chill... there are 8 games left on the schedule. the odds of the bills being winless are so slim Those same odds seem to be improving each week?
Buftex Posted November 8, 2010 Posted November 8, 2010 Mark my words...the Bills will beat the Steelers this year! Mark 'em! They will also beat the Bengals...and the Jets!
VADC Bills Posted November 8, 2010 Posted November 8, 2010 Does Chan Gailey deserve to keep his job if the Bills go 0-16 or 1-15. I just don't see a couple of wins this season. I'm sure they might accidentally win one, but two?
zow2 Posted November 8, 2010 Author Posted November 8, 2010 It would be difficult to keep anyone on the coaching staff if they finish 0-16, but truth is, they aren't getting blown out with Fitz and a couple players here or there could flip this thing. I feel like Chan calls a decent game on O, they just need more talent. The D, well they may need to clean house on that side.
Kultarr Posted November 8, 2010 Posted November 8, 2010 Does Chan Gailey deserve to keep his job if the Bills go 0-16 or 1-15. I just don't see a couple of wins this season. I'm sure they might accidentally win one, but two? No. But, Ralph has painted himself into a corner.
Tortured Soul Posted November 8, 2010 Posted November 8, 2010 Do you really care? truly another point of view
Recommended Posts