Definite team improvement from previous years!

[Meark]

Gnarly dude.. I think we rate 32 out of 32 teams for cheerleaders..

[DrDawkinstein]

well, we're definitely better than the Eagles's Cheerleaders.

 

Warning: Once you see it, it can not be unseen. Look closely...

 

http://www.brinkleys.org/users/tsl/Files/eagles_opxq-2281-mid.jpg

[Guest dog14787]

well, we're definitely better than the Eagles's Cheerleaders.

 

Warning: Once you see it, it can not be unseen. Look closely...

 

http://www.brinkleys.org/users/tsl/Files/eagles_opxq-2281-mid.jpg

 

 

 

lol, what! Cheerleaders with balls showing

 

 

I think the Jill in front on the last Pic is a babe (#34)

Edited October 22, 2010 by dog14787

[truth on hold]

doesn't make me feel any better about our Jills that Eagles have a tranny cheerleader that's even better looking

[Tommy]

Gnarly dude.. I think we rate 32 out of 32 teams for cheerleaders..

 

Actually I'm fairly sure there are a few teams that don't have cheerleaders at all. I think the Packers are one of them. So I guess having the Jills is better than no cheerleaders at all?

 

And in response to the picture of the Philadelphia Eagles cheerleader....maybe she just has big....erm....lips.

[Buftex]

I seem to recall her getting notority as well in national media. Was she deaf?

 

To CM: No argument, Philly, Cincy, St. Lou have beautiful squads. This Jills team is very nice!

 

To BB: Either your standards are a tad high or you should visit your optometrist..

 

 

Not to my knowledge, but that would explain why she would never give me the time of day!

 

Seriously, I don't remember her getting any national coverage, but, IIRC, she was featured in a print add for Marine Midland Bank...I got her to sign a copy in my Game Day program, one rainy Sunday morning at Rich. The sister of a friend of mine was on the Jills squad back then also.