3rdnlng Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 Wrong. At the end of the cycle EVERYONE including the politician is utterly exhausted. His "cycle" dumbass. Just proves you far left lunatics have no sense of humor.
IDBillzFan Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 Five months before the election is the "end of a presidential cycle"? If by five months you mean five days, and if by presidential you mean menstrual, then yes.
pBills Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 His "cycle" dumbass. Just proves you far left lunatics have no sense of humor. My bad, wasn't thinking THAT cycle. By the way, not a FAR left lunatic... left but not far left.
Chef Jim Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 My bad, wasn't thinking THAT cycle. By the way, not a FAR left lunatic... left but not far left. But still a lunatic right?
3rdnlng Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 My bad, wasn't thinking THAT cycle. By the way, not a FAR left lunatic... left but not far left. Shall we take a vote?
pBills Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 (edited) Shall we take a vote? Go right ahead. I do not agree with everything the far left does. I can't stand Pelosi or Harry Reid. I am more towards the center on many issues. Unlike you guys, everything Obama and democratic is bad. Talk about being far to one side. Of course this will be followed by a statement stating that you and others are not leaning to the far right. Ok. That's like saying the Tea Party isn't Republican Light. Edited October 19, 2010 by pBills
drnykterstein Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 It means people in glass !@#$ing houses shouldnt throw stones, you half-wit. Actually it means people who are standing outside with no !@#$ing clothes on during a March rainstorn shouldnt throw stones. Half-wit. I don't live inside Nancy Pelosi. I don't even like her that much. Also, JOSEPH MCCARTHY!!!
3rdnlng Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 Go right ahead. I do not agree with everything the far left does. I can't stand Pelosi or Harry Reid. I am more towards the center on many issues. Unlike you guys, everything Obama and democratic is bad. Talk about being far to one side. Of course this will be followed by a statement stating that you and others are not leaning to the far right. Ok. That's like saying the Tea Party isn't Republican Light. Tea Party, Republican light? Do you know what TEA stands for?
Gary M Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 This doesn't even make any sense. So a tea-party candidate is a moron who fundamentally misunderstands the constitution (big surprise there), and so your response is "Nancy Pelosi"??? Well I have two words for you SPONGEBOB SQUAREPANTS! I bet you can't beat my witty retort! Hank Johnson, thinks Guam might flip over (democrat) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/01/hank-johnson-thinks-guam_n_521541.html
3rdnlng Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 Hank Johnson, thinks Guam might flip over (democrat) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/01/hank-johnson-thinks-guam_n_521541.html Natural gas is not a fossil fuel---Nancy Pelosi.
Gary M Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 (edited) Natural gas is not a fossil fuel---Nancy Pelosi. +1 I forgot that one. There is always "I invented the internet" - AlGore Edited October 19, 2010 by Gary M
Gene Frenkle Posted October 19, 2010 Author Posted October 19, 2010 Spin doctors and retards, it's the FREAKING FIRST AMENDMENT. If it were the second amendment, you'd be all over this, no? Please put up someone worth "Voting the Bums Out" for. +1 I forgot that one. There is always "I invented the internet" - AlGore http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp
erynthered Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 Please put up someone worth "Voting the Bums Out" for. So out of ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL the seats up for grabs, you cherry pick her to complain about. Come on, there's got to be at least a hundred more you could B word about. Keep looking.
Gary M Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 Spin doctors and retards, it's the FREAKING FIRST AMENDMENT. If it were the second amendment, you'd be all over this, no? Please put up someone worth "Voting the Bums Out" for. http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp " I took the initiative in creating the Internet." Thanks for the link
DC Tom Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 Spin doctors and retards, it's the FREAKING FIRST AMENDMENT. If it were the second amendment, you'd be all over this, no? Please put up someone worth "Voting the Bums Out" for. http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp Second's easy: guns. The First is complicated: talk, worship, and rioting. That's a lot for a politician to hold in their head. At this point, I'm practically supportive of voting in idiots, on the principle that they know they're not intellectuals, and won't try to pass laws "for your own good, because we're intellectuals and we know better." Hell, if you think about it, anyone smart enough to use a credit card responsibly is smart enough to run for federal office - which, while admittedly eliminating a hell of a lot of Americans from consideration, is still a hell of a lot of otherwise dimwitted people.
/dev/null Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 I don't live inside Nancy Pelosi. I guess that's kind of a relief. Where you describe sounds like cold barren desolate wasteland.
IDBillzFan Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 Spin doctors and retards, it's the FREAKING FIRST AMENDMENT. If it were the second amendment, you'd be all over this, no? Please put up someone worth "Voting the Bums Out" for. http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the internet." Sounds pretty cut and dried to me.
drnykterstein Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 Hank Johnson, thinks Guam might flip over (democrat) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/01/hank-johnson-thinks-guam_n_521541.html Ya I read that one before. He's pretty silly, I do agree.
Gene Frenkle Posted October 19, 2010 Author Posted October 19, 2010 Sounds pretty cut and dried to me. What doesn't? At this point, I'm practically supportive of voting in idiots, on the principle that they know they're not intellectuals, and won't try to pass laws "for your own good, because we're intellectuals and we know better." Hell, if you think about it, anyone smart enough to use a credit card responsibly is smart enough to run for federal office - which, while admittedly eliminating a hell of a lot of Americans from consideration, is still a hell of a lot of otherwise dimwitted people. That's just the Libertarian in you talking. I think we know how well you tend to suffer fools and idiots.
3rdnlng Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 What doesn't? That's just the Libertarian in you talking. I think we know how well you tend to suffer fools and idiots. Sounds like he's hurt your feelings once or twice before.
Recommended Posts