3rdnlng Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 Telling like he sees it. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100058265/us-physics-professor-global-warming-is-the-greatest-and-most-successful-pseudoscientific-fraud-i-have-seen-in-my-long-life/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 That letter was obviously written by the spin doctors at Faux News at the behest of Big Oil -Connor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 15, 2010 Author Share Posted October 15, 2010 That letter was obviously written by the spin doctors at Faux News at the behest of Big Oil -Connor Sarah Palin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 Even though he makes most of the points I've been making for years...resigning from the APS is kind-of like resigning from PPP. It's really not that big a deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 The APS can defend itself Regardless, I like how some of you dopes are going to use this as a rationalization to convince yourselves global warming is not a fact. One resignation from one member of one society (out of hundreds) == GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 One resignation from one member of one society (out of hundreds) == GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX! Especially when the only proof you need that it's NOT a hoax is a Bill Nye Youtube video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 The APS can defend itself Regardless, I like how some of you dopes are going to use this as a rationalization to convince yourselves global warming is not a fact. One resignation from one member of one society (out of hundreds) == GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX! You do realize that the article talked little of global warming, and mostly focused on the actions of APS right? You do realize that the link you provided about APS's defense didn't actaully refute any of the claims about the practices and the actions of the organization that this guy was upset with. I'm sure you also realize that the only thing the link you provided defended the APS about was the clearly stated "conjecture" at the end of the resignation letter. You read all this and knew what what was being said here before you started talking right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BB27 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 The APS can defend itself Regardless, I like how some of you dopes are going to use this as a rationalization to convince yourselves global warming is not a fact. One resignation from one member of one society (out of hundreds) == GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 The APS can defend itself Regardless, I like how some of you dopes are going to use this as a rationalization to convince yourselves global warming is not a fact. One resignation from one member of one society (out of hundreds) == GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX! Can you read beyond a first-grade level? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 Can you read beyond a first-grade level? Oh please! You know better than that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 (edited) You do realize that the article talked little of global warming, and mostly focused on the actions of APS right? You do realize that the link you provided about APS's defense didn't actaully refute any of the claims about the practices and the actions of the organization that this guy was upset with. I'm sure you also realize that the only thing the link you provided defended the APS about was the clearly stated "conjecture" at the end of the resignation letter. You read all this and knew what what was being said here before you started talking right? Like I said, the APS can defend itself, I am not going to defend them. The actions of this one organization do not affect climate change though. Edited October 15, 2010 by conner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 Like I said, the APS can defend itself, I am not going to defend them. Except the APS didn't. They never addressed the content of the "resignation" letter. The letter said "You're perverting the scientific process." APS responded "Global warming is real, so we're not listening." And you couldn't defend them. You clearly don't understand the exchange - particularly given that you think APS "defended" themselves. The actions of this one organization do not affect climate change though. You think the IPCC is any different? If it were just one organization, it wouldn't be an issue. But the science is being done improperly across the board...that's the entire point, you nitwit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 You think the IPCC is any different? If it were just one organization, it wouldn't be an issue. But the science is being done improperly across the board...that's the entire point, you nitwit. I strongly disagree with this. IPCC works very had to be honest and open, and receptive to criticism. They do try to improve their methods and data. As with any human run organization, they are only human. Science is not being done improperly though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 The actions of this one organization do not affect climate change though. You finally made a valid point. All the human beings together do not affect climate change, there were no cars when the glaciers that carved the fingerlakes melted, or when the sahara was a jungle. The climate changes all on it's own. Any claim otherwise is a socialist trick to control population and wealth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 I strongly disagree with this. IPCC works very had to be honest and open, and receptive to criticism. They do try to improve their methods and data. As with any human run organization, they are only human. Science is not being done improperly though. Funny that you're anti-religion. Sounds like you're almost engaging in apologetics here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 (edited) I strongly disagree with this. IPCC works very had to be honest and open, and receptive to criticism. They do try to improve their methods and data. As with any human run organization, they are only human. Science is not being done improperly though. Again, you show you have no knowledge of how science should actually be done. You never answered my last question several weeks ago. What is your scientific background?? Edited October 15, 2010 by Wacka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 I strongly disagree with this. IPCC works very had to be honest and open, and receptive to criticism. They do try to improve their methods and data. As with any human run organization, they are only human. Science is not being done improperly though. This guy's gotta be a plant. There's just no way. No one is this stupid. Thanks for playing the part of punching bag though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 I strongly disagree with this. IPCC works very had to be honest and open, and receptive to criticism. They do try to improve their methods and data. As with any human run organization, they are only human. Science is not being done improperly though. And if you weren't a complete dolt who couldn't read beyond a first grade level, you'd know why that's complete bull ****. IPCC, an honest and open organization? And that's your example of science being done properly? Their charter specifically requires them to be biased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Like I said, the APS can defend itself, I am not going to defend them. The actions of this one organization do not affect climate change though. I'm with you. It has been shown though that the farts of cows and other mammals impact global warming more than anything else. Although it is sad, I think we should kill all mammals so that humans may live. I like dogs and cats and turtles as much as the next guy.......well not as much as the big cat but that is a whole other topic.......but we need to kill them because of their mammal farts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 I'm with you. It has been shown though that the farts of cows and other mammals impact global warming more than anything else. Although it is sad, I think we should kill all mammals so that humans may live. I like dogs and cats and turtles as much as the next guy.......well not as much as the big cat but that is a whole other topic.......but we need to kill them because of their mammal farts. Oh! Now I understand why Gary M hates all the wildlife so much and want to kill all of the liberal animals. This makes sense now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts