Nasty Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 I know he is a third string QB on Denver. I think he might fit well with Buffalo. As I watch the Bills Offense it reminds me of a modification of a Charlie Wies type of offense. I think we can get him for dirt cheap and he may fit well.
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 REPEAT AFTER ME: The QB is not the problem, The QB is not the problem!
Ghost of Rob Johnson Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 REPEAT AFTER ME: The QB is not the problem, The QB is not the problem! QB is one of many problems, but Brady Quinn isn't the answer.
Nasty Posted October 11, 2010 Author Posted October 11, 2010 REPEAT AFTER ME: The QB is not the problem, The QB is not the problem! It may not be the whole problem but it is a problem. Don't you want a quarterback with an upside? Fitz has no more upside we know all about him. Yes he is a quick thinker and a firecracker which are good for the backup QB. Cause if a team losses its Starting QB most of the team will be down and would need a pick-me-up (Fitz)
tennesseeboy Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 Buddy is negotiating to get Trent Edwards back for a second round pick.
Guest dog14787 Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 (edited) How about Graham Harrell, the guys just sitting there on the Packers practice squad, or was anyway. One thing the Packers do very well is evaluating the QB and they must see something they like in Graham Harrell. Harrell looked good through preseason in my opinion. When your standing in the shadows of Aaron Rodgers its not easy to impress. Edited October 11, 2010 by dog14787
Buffalo Wing Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 Living down here in Cleveland and watching the Brady Quinn experiment play out first hand, I can tell you that my answer is no, no, no.
silvermike Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 I don't really see how Brady Quinn has any more upside than Ryan Fitzpatrick. I'm not interested at junking one replacement-level QB to bring in another who's probably worse. If there's a real project out there, I'd be interested in ditching Levi Brown for him - maybe Graham Harrell fits that bill. But Quinn's in his 4th season, and he's got about as much upside left as Trent Edwards.
JPS Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 Buddy is negotiating to get Trent Edwards back for a second round pick. Dunno why, but that's funny.
metzelaars_lives Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 I hear Ryan Leaf is still available. Is Heath Shuler available? How about Todd Blackledge? Chuck Long? David Klingler?
silvermike Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 Is Heath Shuler available? How about Todd Blackledge? Chuck Long? David Klingler? Congressman Shuler doesn't seem to be facing any stiff opposition for re-election this year, so he's probably going to keep that job and ignore Buddy's phone calls.
jamestown-cuse Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 QB is one of many problems, but Brady Quinn isn't the answer. QB is a maaaaaajor problem... have you been watching? Granted, the defense seems to big the "biggest" problem right now with the wrong personell and coaching philosophy but keep an eye on the big picture K?
GaryPinC Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 I watched the Brady Quinn experiment here in Cleveland and to me, he went from a guy who was struggling to master the NFL offense to a guy (in his last few games) who seemed to finally understand it but was overthrowing the ball and highly inaccurate. To me, he still may have some potential as an NFL quarterback but do you really want to give up something to get him? If he gets cut he might be worth a look though.
apuszczalowski Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 How about Graham Harrell, the guys just sitting there on the Packers practice squad, or was anyway. One thing the Packers do very well is evaluating the QB and they must see something they like in Graham Harrell. Harrell looked good through preseason in my opinion. When your standing in the shadows of Aaron Rodgers its not easy to impress. But he sucks, he was already cut by the Packers (to get him on the practice squad, he obviously sucks (or whatever other comments are made about Brian Brohm being a bust)
CodeMonkey Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 Brady Freaking Quinn now huh. The current Bills regime may be viewed as being slow to make moves (like any slower and they would be in reverse), but the GM wanna-bes on here are so quick to pull the trigger on something, anything they would make moves before thinking them through even a little, much less completely. But the what-ifs can be entertaining ... unlike the on field performance.
Captain Caveman Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 It may not be the whole problem but it is a problem. Don't you want a quarterback with an upside? Fitz has no more upside we know all about him. Yes he is a quick thinker and a firecracker which are good for the backup QB. Cause if a team losses its Starting QB most of the team will be down and would need a pick-me-up (Fitz) How many years does a guy have upside?
akm0404 Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 Why do Bills fans insist on having a terrible quarterback?
Recommended Posts