Rudyc80 Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 anyone know what the deal is as far as how long he is signed for?
ch19079 Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 why would we let clements go? our best CB, and hes young and can tackle (not as good as winfield though), and can cover (MUCH better than winfield). you need 2 solid corners nowadays anyways. i say McGee is good, but not good enouph to be left on an island with the top WRs. McGee's tackles are on his WR who caught the ball 10 yards deep. clements tackles are on RB 2 yards deep. McGees INTs come because clements guy is covered and the pass was not on target. Clements INTs come because he is in good position. i like him, but i wouldnt even put him in the top 30 CBs in the league. (kick returns would be a diffrent story). 32 teams. do you think he would be the #1 guy on any of them?? (besides the eagles, they can play D with highschool kids at CB).
BuffOrange Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 According to Madden 2005, Clements & McGee both expire after 2005.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 McGee is signed through 2005. After that he'll be a RFA with a 4th rounder as comp is given just the minimum tender.
BillsSouth Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 I fear Clements will ask for a lot of money in 2005 - Winfield money, probably. And I don´t know if TD will want to give him top $$$, since he intercepts few passes for a top CB and makes too many boneheaded plays...
Mikie2times Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 I think our first pick in the draft is shaping up to be a CB. TD often looks at future position of need just as heavily as a current position of need. With Clements and MaGee both FA in 2005 I expect the Bills to only be able and keep one of them.
The Jokeman Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 I think our first pick in the draft is shaping up to be a CB. TD often looks at future position of need just as heavily as a current position of need. With Clements and MaGee both FA in 2005 I expect the Bills to only be able and keep one of them. 150747[/snapback] As already mentioned McGee will be restricted and much easier to retain. According to the NFLPA.org website the Bills have no CBs signed for the 2006 season (Vincent is listed as a Safety). Kevin Thomas' contract is finished after this season and will be a RFA. I'm sure he'll be retained but as explained in earlier post the selecting of a CB with our top pick is definately a possibility.
CajunBillsBacker Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 I bet McGee gets a raise and extension during the offseason this year. To avoid having your top CB's contracts to be up at the same time, and to lock a proven KR up for years like they did with Brian Moorman after he proved himself.
crackur Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 clements isn't in the same league as top notch corners........he still gets burned........he knows that......like trying to get that fumble........ I'm glad to have him..........I think he is one of the best.........but in NFL terms he is still average
d_wag Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 As already mentioned McGee will be restricted and much easier to retain. According to the NFLPA.org website the Bills have no CBs signed for the 2006 season (Vincent is listed as a Safety). Kevin Thomas' contract is finished after this season and will be a RFA. I'm sure he'll be retained but as explained in earlier post the selecting of a CB with our top pick is definately a possibility. 150884[/snapback] sidenote -- from the nov. 5 "tip sheet" Buffalo has approached second-year corner Terrence McGee about a four-year extension, but so far the numbers, which include a seven-figure signing bonus, haven't jibed.
gantrules Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 I bet McGee gets a raise and extension during the offseason this year. To avoid having your top CB's contracts to be up at the same time, and to lock a proven KR up for years like they did with Brian Moorman after he proved himself. 150902[/snapback] Sign McGee as quickly as possible. You guys may think he's not that great...but he's a rookie. You can see the guy has great potential to be a #2 corner in this league for a long time and is a stud KR. Do it.....Do it...
Guest McGee's Mom Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 Sign McGee as quickly as possible. You guys may think he's not that great...but he's a rookie. You can see the guy has great potential to be a #2 corner in this league for a long time and is a stud KR. Do it.....Do it... 151040[/snapback] I think he's a second-year player. 151108[/snapback] same dif
Guest Guest_eyedog_* Posted December 8, 2004 Posted December 8, 2004 The one they had better sign and the sooner the better is Clements. This guy will be in his prime for his next contract and he will be in the Pro Bowl very soon. The way I see it is if they can sign a mediocre d-end to big cash and they will probably overpay for an often injured o-tackle, they damn well better sign their #1 corner coming into his best years.
Recommended Posts