3rdnlng Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 (edited) Stuff like this just keeps popping up. Ah, the 57 states. Seems like I've heard something about them a couple of years ago. http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=39266 Edited October 4, 2010 by 3rdnlng
Peace Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 (edited) Wow there are a lot of crazy websites out there. Glad to see Lyndon LaRouche has his right wing counterparts! Edited October 4, 2010 by Peace
Magox Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 (edited) Come on 3rd, when you post **** like this, one could argue that you are approaching a level of someone who would create a thread titled : 78 GOP candidates: force women to bear rapists’ babies Edited October 4, 2010 by Magox
LeviF Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Come on 3rd, when you post **** like this, one could argue that you are approaching a level of someone who would create a thread titled : Did you read the comments? :lol: Some good **** in there.
Gene Frenkle Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Stuff like this just keeps popping up. Ah, the 57 states. Seems like I've heard something about them a couple of years ago. http://www.humaneven...le.php?id=39266 Seriously? I'd say you're better than this, but...
3rdnlng Posted October 4, 2010 Author Posted October 4, 2010 Come on 3rd, when you post **** like this, one could argue that you are approaching a level of someone who would create a thread titled : What do you mean **** like this? I at least read it before linking to it, so don't throw me in with that moron. Besides, what is the Whitehouse doing sending their representative to sit with people who publicly honor known terrorists? What's wrong with a little discussion of the issue(s)? Seriously? I'd say you're better than this, but... Did you read the column? If so, that's all you can say?
Gary M Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 What do you mean **** like this? I at least read it before linking to it, so don't throw me in with that moron. Besides, what is the Whitehouse doing sending their representative to sit with people who publicly honor known terrorists? What's wrong with a little discussion of the issue(s)? Did you read the column? If so, that's all you can say? You are just trying to muddy the arguement with the facts, cut it out.
Gene Frenkle Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 * Remember, never consider the source when you find something on the Internet that bolsters your worldview.
ieatcrayonz Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 * Remember, never consider the source when you find something on the Internet that bolsters your worldview. From the article: Hear what I'm telling you well. The Americans are not your friends ... The Canadians are not your friends .. Everybody is wrong sometimes and everybody is right sometimes.
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 (edited) regardless... either way muslim extremists are trying to de-sensitive us and scare the world into accepting Sharia little by little and they are using our own "PC" cultue to facilitate it Edited October 5, 2010 by drinkTHEkoolaid
3rdnlng Posted October 5, 2010 Author Posted October 5, 2010 * Remember, never consider the source when you find something on the Internet that bolsters your worldview. The source or the conduit? So, it is a conservative site so it must be wrong? Wow, who's backing up who's worldview?
Gene Frenkle Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 The source or the conduit? So, it is a conservative site so it must be wrong? Wow, who's backing up who's worldview? You could at least have the decency of linking to Faux News or some such. Despite your obviously conspiracy-minded paranoia about the liberal media, if a story has legitimacy, legitimate news outlets will eventually pick it up. Keeping away from the lunatic fringe sites has the added benefit of acting as a pretty good filter from every piece of crap hack with an agenda and access to the internet.
3rdnlng Posted October 5, 2010 Author Posted October 5, 2010 You could at least have the decency of linking to Faux News or some such. Despite your obviously conspiracy-minded paranoia about the liberal media, if a story has legitimacy, legitimate news outlets will eventually pick it up. Keeping away from the lunatic fringe sites has the added benefit of acting as a pretty good filter from every piece of crap hack with an agenda and access to the internet. Who's to say what is a legitimate news source? Daily Events is a lunatic fringe site? Maybe I should only get my info from CBS and Dan Rather. No, I can't do that as I recall a little something about forged documents. How about all of the other "legitimate" news sources who cropped a picture of a black man with a rifle at a tea party rally? Wouldn't have known he was black when they described him along the lines of being a dienfranchised white racist male. Even after all of that I'm not ready to say there is some mass conspiracy in the media, just a simple-minded tendency to put on blinders for anything that is "left" and a urgent desire to follow their Pied Piper anywhere he wants to go.
Gene Frenkle Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 Who's to say what is a legitimate news source? Daily Events is a lunatic fringe site? Maybe I should only get my info from CBS and Dan Rather. No, I can't do that as I recall a little something about forged documents. How about all of the other "legitimate" news sources who cropped a picture of a black man with a rifle at a tea party rally? Wouldn't have known he was black when they described him along the lines of being a dienfranchised white racist male. Even after all of that I'm not ready to say there is some mass conspiracy in the media, just a simple-minded tendency to put on blinders for anything that is "left" and a urgent desire to follow their Pied Piper anywhere he wants to go. So...nothing for Faux News then?
3rdnlng Posted October 5, 2010 Author Posted October 5, 2010 So...nothing for Faux News then? So, you are now admitting that Fox News* is legitimate? If you are throwing them in with the Alphabet news sources I'm not sure they'd be happy with your brand of legitimate. * I am aware of Sean Hannity's program using the wrong crowd footage on his show. When discovered they did apologize. When Dan Rather was caught he wouldn't admit his folly. I'm not aware of the other networks ever owning up to the deliberate attempt to twist the white male racist with a gun story. Regardless, you haven't mentioned one thing about the column in the original link I posted. All you have railed about is the source. Why don't you read the article and refute what it says, not just do your usual drive-by hack job on the source. And btw, it wasn't even a very good hack job.
drnykterstein Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 (edited) "Sharia Law In the US" Lol. There's one for the archives. 3rdnlng thinks the US is headed for Sharia Law. Got it. Come on 3rd, when you post **** like this, one could argue that you are approaching a level of someone who would create a thread titled : Do you dispute that as a factual statement? Edited October 5, 2010 by conner
Gene Frenkle Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 So, you are now admitting that Fox News* is legitimate? If you are throwing them in with the Alphabet news sources I'm not sure they'd be happy with your brand of legitimate. It's all relative. I never thought I would say this, but consider it neutral ground here. That last statement would normally be laughable, but in this case effectively illustrates how much of a wingnut you really are.
3rdnlng Posted October 5, 2010 Author Posted October 5, 2010 "Sharia Law In the US" Lol. There's one for the archives. 3rdnlng thinks the US is headed for Sharia Law. Got it. Do you dispute that as a factual statement? I do refute that. I linked to an article that referred to certain groups and a Whitehouse representative that would like to see it happen. Maybe if you would have read the column you'd know that. I think we will wake up much sooner than the UK and prevent it from happening here. Do you ever have anything of substance to say? It's all relative. I never thought I would say this, but consider it neutral ground here. That last statement would normally be laughable, but in this case effectively illustrates how much of a wingnut you really are. Nice attempt at another hack job. Why don't you ever have anything of substance to say? I'm beginning to wonder if you should be called mini connor or he should be called mini frenkle.
drnykterstein Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 I do refute that. I linked to an article that referred to certain groups and a Whitehouse representative that would like to see it happen. Maybe if you would have read the column you'd know that. I think we will wake up much sooner than the UK and prevent it from happening here. Do you ever have anything of substance to say? Nice attempt at another hack job. Why don't you ever have anything of substance to say? I'm beginning to wonder if you should be called mini connor or he should be called mini frenkle. Lol, do you pay attention to anything? My question was directed at Magox. Get A Brain Moran!!
Recommended Posts