Cowboys hang 49 on Seattle.

[ATBNG]

The Boys really only scored 36 and thus should have lost.  That alleged TD by Johnson in the final 2 minutes wasn't a TD.

149933[/snapback]

 

Clear force out anyway. Plus, Seattle showed so little heart that they were bound to find some other way to lose.

[RkFast]

Awesome, Danny.....Awesome.

 

ICE's LATEST "Look at me" tactic. Look at the teams the Bills played LAST week, comparing to who they played THIS week to gauge how good Buffalo is.

 

He's fuggin pathetic.

[Alaska Darin]

...and New England only put 30 up against them in New England.  I guess, through the kind of conclusion you are trying to draw, that we are better than NE.  I could have swore that you were trying to paint a negative picture, but okay.

 

...and yet the Seahawks still beat your COTY candidate.  I guess if you are going to draw parallels then the Panthers really super suck. 

 

Seems to me you were saying 4 weeks ago that two out of three road wins and a win over St. Louis would make us "legitimate."  http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showtopic=9096

At the time:

-the Rams had the same win/loss %age as they do now.

-the Seahawks were on top of the division.  They still are.

-Miami was beatable.  They still are. 

So what changed between then and now that, in meeting the criteria you established on 11/7, the Bills still suck?

Oh, and BTW, it's too bad the genius Parcells put the old washed up QB in instead of the "QB of the future."  After all, being a genius Parcells should know that the only way the Cowboys will win a Super Bowl is if he starts Henson now...And if the Seahawks suck so bad that the Bills beat them, then Henson should have been able to throw for 6 TDs against them....

150212[/snapback]

Thanks for saving me the keystrokes.

[IDBillzFan]

Hey I am realising more every day that to post here you need to be a homeristic cheerleader.

149919[/snapback]

Or a pessimistic cocksocker...as 12,614 posts apparently prove.