Jerry Jabber Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2010/9/29/1719950/bills-vs-jets-bills-may-be-without-dt-stroud I wonder if this is a legitimate injury or if the coaches are coming up with a phantom injury to get Stroud out of the starting lineup (considering how bad he's looked so far this year) to give Carrington/Johnson/McCargo a shot?
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 yeah mccargo over stroud well with extending kelsey maybe its to extend mccargo now
playman Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 5 yrs/50 mil with 49 guaranteed sounds about right.........
Jerry Jabber Posted September 29, 2010 Author Posted September 29, 2010 I hope Carrington gets his chance to play. With McCargo, he looked good in preseason, plus he's a former #1 pick, with that much investment, the team should see if he can play at DE, if not, then it was a big waste to keep him on the roster in the first place. With Kelsay...absolutely disgusting!! How the f@ck does this organization constantly reward a sub-par player? Kelsay is a backup at best and he's getting $6 mil a year? WTF!!!
mob16151 Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 (edited) I hope he wears something pretty. Edited September 29, 2010 by mob16151
Chandemonium Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 I posted a similar thread hours ago and no one even looked at it, this one gets 4 replies in ten minutes. Funny how the board works sometimes lol
Jerry Jabber Posted September 29, 2010 Author Posted September 29, 2010 On 9/29/2010 at 9:38 PM, Chandemonium said: I posted a similar thread hours ago and no one even looked at it, this one gets 4 replies in ten minutes. Funny how the board works sometimes lol Guess everyone is in an uproar over the Kelsay extension.
Big Turk Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 On 9/29/2010 at 9:15 PM, Jerry Jabber said: http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2010/9/29/1719950/bills-vs-jets-bills-may-be-without-dt-stroud I wonder if this is a legitimate injury or if the coaches are coming up with a phantom injury to get Stroud out of the starting lineup (considering how bad he's looked so far this year) to give Carrington/Johnson/McCargo a shot? This might be good news seeing how Stroud is being blocked by just about anyone including the RB's and TE's...
K-Gun10 Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 People People People Spencer Johnson will start and McCargo will back him up nothing to get excited about
papazoid Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 On 9/29/2010 at 9:38 PM, Chandemonium said: I posted a similar thread hours ago and no one even looked at it, this one gets 4 replies in ten minutes. Funny how the board works sometimes lol your title was all wrong... try "STROUD EXTENDED"............lol
The Dean Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 On 9/29/2010 at 9:15 PM, Jerry Jabber said: I wonder if this is a legitimate injury or if the coaches are coming up with a phantom injury Really? You are usually a bit more sensible than that.
ChasBB Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 On 9/29/2010 at 9:51 PM, K-Gun10 said: People People People Spencer Johnson will start and McCargo will back him up nothing to get excited about The official depth chart lists Carrington ahead of McCargo. I would really like to see Carrington get some needed game experience now.
DarthICE Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 On 9/29/2010 at 9:15 PM, Jerry Jabber said: http://www.buffaloru...thout-dt-stroud I wonder if this is a legitimate injury or if the coaches are coming up with a phantom injury to get Stroud out of the starting lineup (considering how bad he's looked so far this year) to give Carrington/Johnson/McCargo a shot? Stroud has played?
The Dean Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 On 9/29/2010 at 9:57 PM, DarthICE said: Stroud has played? Still not watching the games, I see. Hard not to know a guy with 13 tackles in three games is playing, if you are actually paying attention. Not saying he's playing great so far. But he's playing.
dave mcbride Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 On 9/29/2010 at 10:01 PM, The Dean said: Still not watching the games, I see. Hard not to know a guy with 13 tackles in three games is playing, if you are actually paying attention. Not saying he's playing great so far. But he's playing. He's in a boot, which makes me think that he's been playing hurt. He's been a solid contributor since he arrived - definitely worth the price we paid (a 3rd and a 5th).
BobChalmers Posted September 29, 2010 Posted September 29, 2010 On 9/29/2010 at 10:01 PM, The Dean said: Still not watching the games, I see. Hard not to know a guy with 13 tackles in three games is playing, if you are actually paying attention. Not saying he's playing great so far. But he's playing. Thank you. All these people who were screaming for us to go to a 3-4 but obviously had no clue what that means. The DEs aren't the pass-rushers in the defense, kids. Our pass rush sucks because our OLB's suck. And we just extended Kelsay - wow. The curent DL is doing fine.
Recommended Posts