BuffaloBaumer Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 love it - I really hope he starts against us as that would actually make the game interesting....
H2o Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 What if Trent started and was the winning QB? Would the board implode? I think so.
Punch Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 (edited) Presumably, now that Trent is no longer "one of us" Chan won't mind if we "dog" him when he likely starts next Sunday in Buffalo. Edited September 28, 2010 by Punch
BuffaloBaumer Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 What if Trent started and was the winning QB? Would the board implode? I think so. With no pass rush, I am expecting it and really wouldn't care...
AxelRipper Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 if trent started and won it wouldnt be because he won, it would be because our team never actually made it to the stadium
Realist Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 If Edwards starts and beats the Bills, it won't be because he is all of a sudden a great QB. It will be because Buffalo has absolutely no pass rush. Give Edwards some time and he can play pretty well. If the Bills can force him to hurry then they can win that game.
CodeMonkey Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 If Edwards starts and beats the Bills, it won't be because he is all of a sudden a great QB. It will be because Buffalo has absolutely no pass rush. Give Edwards some time and he can play pretty well. If the Bills can force him to hurry then they can win that game. Big if ... but sure makes that game a lot more interesting.
nobody Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 With the added time to throw the ball Trent will be able to dump it to the receiver 7 yards down the field rather then the one 2 yards down the field.
Recommended Posts