Meark Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 I'm thinking that GB takes a flier on Larry Johnson instead. Why give up something for Lynch when you can get LJ for nothing? You know what you get for nothing? NOTHING! 31 year old running back that hasn't produced in years... I hope they do sign him.
A tisker a Tasker Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 After watching him fumble all over the place against UB in the MAC Championship game, I'd have a hard time rooting for Nate Davis. Go Bulls!
Mark Long Beach Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 My guess is Brohm is the back-up QB going forward and they're taking time trying to figure it out if having a 3rd QB is as important as having depth on another position. Bingo. Sounds like they're doing their job. I like it.
Another Point of View Posted September 28, 2010 Author Posted September 28, 2010 (edited) You know what you get for nothing? NOTHING! 31 year old running back that hasn't produced in years... I hope they do sign him. We could have gotten Vick for nothing, but NOoooooo! Edited September 28, 2010 by Another Point of View
C l u t c H 385 Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 I have the same feeling. Kolb and J. Bell for Lynch. Just a thought. Something has to be up. What a delusional post. You HONESTLY think that has even a .000000000001% chance of happening? Use some friggin' common sense people.
Recommended Posts