Nanker Posted September 27, 2010 Posted September 27, 2010 Wrong.... Trent's Salary is 500K of which he will see every penny of it he was on roster at the start of the season as is a Veteran... I always love the "Ralph is Cheap" Trent He's still paying Jauron too.
cåblelady Posted September 27, 2010 Posted September 27, 2010 The players wanted to give the new coaches and management the benefit of the doubt, and also give Trent the benefit of the doubt. His gutless actions were so alarming that the players were ready to mutiny. Gailey was going to risk losing the team if he stayed with Trent. Makes perfect sense to me. I went to the Miami game with high hopes. After the 1st offensive series I had that familiar sinking feeling in my gut. I was so hoping Trent would prove me wrong. Time to move on.
Doc Posted September 27, 2010 Posted September 27, 2010 Wrong.... Trent's Salary is 500K of which he will see every penny of it he was on roster at the start of the season as is a Veteran... I always love the "Ralph is Cheap" Trent Trent isn't a vested veteran so his salary isn't guaranteed. As for whether this is a move that was made to save money, that was a side benefit.
LGB Posted September 27, 2010 Posted September 27, 2010 First you like the Kelsay signing, now you are privy to inside info? Oi. lol - the "REAL" reason is TE could only throw for five yards and run out of bounds...man why didn't I post the "REAL" reason...
billsfan in n.h Posted September 27, 2010 Posted September 27, 2010 I will always support Kelsay and I have my reasons, but that is not related to this issue. are you chris kelsay??? just wondering
Kkspike Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 Do you know what single coverage on a wr means. That guy is open.don't feel bad for Trent he made more $$$then what mist people will make in 5 lifetimes. Hey this guy will end up with a ring somewhere. Johnson, brunell,Bledsoe, the list goes on.
Spiderweb Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 Do you know what single coverage on a wr means. That guy is open.don't feel bad for Trent he made more $$$then what mist people will make in 5 lifetimes. Hey this guy will end up with a ring somewhere. Johnson, brunell,Bledsoe, the list goes on. I believe you meant "most people", and even at 500K per year (4 years), that does not come anywhere near what most people will earn in "5 lifetimes". Do the math.........
Clippers of Nfl Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 I will always support Kelsay and I have my reasons, but that is not related to this issue. shouldn't you be baking a sweet cake or something mom?
Hapless Bills Fan Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 The real reason the Edwards situation ended like this was because there was a big locker room issue. The team lost all confidence in him after he refused to throw the hail mary attempt at the end of the first game, and several players went to the coaching staff. The pressure on the coaching staff mounted until he was finally benched. He did not take it very well, and the whole situation was dangerously close to having a Whitner-type tweet about it and it becoming a circus. This is what I heard through a pretty reliable source. Chan and Buddy are not totally clueless. They liked this guy and wanted to give him a chance, and it's not like in two weeks they magically realized what all the fans have known for quite some time. They were handcuffed in this situation, and I say good for the players for stepping up and trying to create a winning mentality. I really hope this isn't true. Not 'cuz I don't want the players to step up and create a winning mentality. I do. But I don't want the players running the personnel decisions and trying to wag the dog around either.
Bob in STL Posted September 28, 2010 Posted September 28, 2010 The real reason the Edwards situation ended like this was because there was a big locker room issue. The team lost all confidence in him after he refused to throw the hail mary attempt at the end of the first game, and several players went to the coaching staff. The pressure on the coaching staff mounted until he was finally benched. He did not take it very well, and the whole situation was dangerously close to having a Whitner-type tweet about it and it becoming a circus. This is what I heard through a pretty reliable source. Chan and Buddy are not totally clueless. They liked this guy and wanted to give him a chance, and it's not like in two weeks they magically realized what all the fans have known for quite some time. They were handcuffed in this situation, and I say good for the players for stepping up and trying to create a winning mentality. I was at the Miami game. If I could have went to the coaches and complained about it I would have. I still think about that last series and no attempt to try to get down the field. So Mr. Insider, just how were Chan and Buddy handcuffed?
Recommended Posts