stevestojan Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 We are one NASTY DE away from being a pretty damn complete team. This O-line, despite my doubts, is playing much better. I guess the idea of "gelling" is for real. McGahee - plain old awesome. Lee Evans - hello Probowl for about the next 10 years. Moulds - still a work horse. Hopefully he'll still be here. Bledsoe - man, he impressed me yesterday. Expect for one sack he took that was ridiculous, he looked good. Our defense (LBs and DBs) are solid. And if we can use McGee for a kickoff return specialist, I think he would be probowl for ST's. So, this draft I think we need to focus on: DE. And I mean with our first pick. Then one solid DB. Then a decent TE. This all assumes we keep everyone mentioned about, and I still think we can get a 4th rounder for henry.
seq004 Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 We are one NASTY DE away from being a pretty damn complete team. This O-line, despite my doubts, is playing much better. I guess the idea of "gelling" is for real. McGahee - plain old awesome. Lee Evans - hello Probowl for about the next 10 years. Moulds - still a work horse. Hopefully he'll still be here. Bledsoe - man, he impressed me yesterday. Expect for one sack he took that was ridiculous, he looked good. Our defense (LBs and DBs) are solid. And if we can use McGee for a kickoff return specialist, I think he would be probowl for ST's. So, this draft I think we need to focus on: DE. And I mean with our first pick. Then one solid DB. Then a decent TE. This all assumes we keep everyone mentioned about, and I still think we can get a 4th rounder for henry. 149014[/snapback] O-line with our first pick! Please, we make the same mistake every year. If our O-line would not have taken so long to "Gel" we might be 8-4. Yes, we defintely need a DE because of our lack of pass rush so maybe a free agent
BillsFan Trapped in Pats Land Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 What's so bad about Denney & Kelsay?? Between them you have 78 tackles, 5.5 sacks and 1 fumble recovery. Having a rotation often works better, in today's NFL.
_BiB_ Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 I don't know that the draft is going to be that strong next year. Then again, who's in the FA pile? I've yet to be able to find a coherent list. Either way, O-line needs depth, if nothing else. I would not be stunned to see another RB picked up. The Bills need a kicker.
BillsFan Trapped in Pats Land Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 The Bills need a kicker. 149312[/snapback] Not a Lindell fan?? The guy has been pretty automatic. Not a ton of attempts, but that's not his fault.
Bill from NYC Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 Not a Lindell fan?? The guy has been pretty automatic. Not a ton of attempts, but that's not his fault. 149320[/snapback] His kickoffs are not deep enough. Not enough touchbacks, no?
The Jokeman Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 What's so bad about Denney & Kelsay?? Between them you have 78 tackles, 5.5 sacks and 1 fumble recovery. Having a rotation often works better, in today's NFL. 149310[/snapback] Their numbers are nice but to me with the Bills lacking a consistant pass rush threat outside Aaron Schobel is why this defense is good and not great. I really felt the Bills should have gone after James Hall or Lance Johnstone this offseason. Both have over 9 sacks this season. You can't tell me that added pass rush wouldn't improve this defense. That's while I'll call for us to go after Darren Howard or John Abraham in this coming offseason. As if the defense was slightly better we might be on the better side of .500 about now. I know the offense deserves some blame too as not saying we have a bad defense but feel it could be improved with a pass rusher.
IDBillzFan Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 Don't get so excited, young man. The last three wins were misleading. Yesterday's performance by Drew was against a 2-9 team, so you should take that into consideration. Seven turnovers, but only fourteen points off turnovers? Very below average. McGahee didn't even get 100 yards against a team missing most of its linebacking corps. Don Criqui didn't give ups any real props. Clearly we're a team on decline and you should stop trying to be so freakin' optimistic because the falseness of what you're seeing will come true next year while Losman begins his development. [/sarcasm off]
BillsGuyInMalta Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 I really think the Bills need to invest in a new kicker. I mean, sure Lindell's stats arent that bad, but the guy just cant kick over 40 yards consistently. Thats scary. Why not have a weapon at kicker instead of a liability? In terms of the Draft, I'd like to see the Bills take a chance on Munoz if he is around in the 2nd round. Injuries and lack of playing time have hurt his draft status, but a year ago this kid was a surefire 1st rounder. If he's not available, I'd go for either the best O-Lineman available or another CB just in case Clements decides to split after the 2005 season.
stevestojan Posted December 6, 2004 Author Posted December 6, 2004 anyone know if Tony Gonzalez will be an UFA after this year? Man... that would be sweet
stuckincincy Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 They should take a good look at the Texan's Seth Marler. They drafted Scobee this year, and keep both on the roster. Very unusual...
ICE Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 We are one NASTY DE away from being a pretty damn complete team. This O-line, despite my doubts, is playing much better. I guess the idea of "gelling" is for real. McGahee - plain old awesome. Lee Evans - hello Probowl for about the next 10 years. Moulds - still a work horse. Hopefully he'll still be here. Bledsoe - man, he impressed me yesterday. Expect for one sack he took that was ridiculous, he looked good. Our defense (LBs and DBs) are solid. And if we can use McGee for a kickoff return specialist, I think he would be probowl for ST's. So, this draft I think we need to focus on: DE. And I mean with our first pick. Then one solid DB. Then a decent TE. This all assumes we keep everyone mentioned about, and I still think we can get a 4th rounder for henry. 149014[/snapback] Not gonna happen. TD has his two DE's. We need a stud TE for this to come together
_BiB_ Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 Not gonna happen. TD has his two DE's. We need a stud TE for this to come together 149382[/snapback] Naw, we need a QB. JP's been wasted because we didn't toss the season four games ago to get him playing time. His psyche is certainly bruised beyond repair now.
ICE Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 Naw, we need a QB. JP's been wasted because we didn't toss the season four games ago to get him playing time. His psyche is certainly bruised beyond repair now. 149392[/snapback] The longer he sits the longer it will be before he is ready/ We can actually try to go beyond being just above average
_BiB_ Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 The longer he sits the longer it will be before he is ready/ We can actually try to go beyond being just above average 149394[/snapback] And it will happen. In time. Flat out, You want to sit Bledsoe now? Yes or no?
Alaska Darin Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 Donahoe won't draft another DE in the second round.His stuborness to stick with Denney/Kelsay won't allow it. O yea....Bledsoe will not make this team a "complete" team....His career shows he doesn't play well against good teams, how are we going to win the superbowl with him as our quarterback? 149018[/snapback] Horse crap. He'll pick the player he thinks will make the largest impact, regardless of position.
ATBNG Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 It was a nice win yesterday, as any division road win is one to be cherished, but AJ Feeley and his Dolphins putting 32 points up is at least a little disconcerting. While TD works out which skill position player he wants for the future at each of the big 3 positions (QB, RB, WR), Father Time is working on a lot of the key guys on defense. Evans performance, to TD's credit, is very encouraging.
WILLIS Posted December 6, 2004 Posted December 6, 2004 i dont kno bout picking DE with our first pick but im sure donahoe will grab one sometime during the draft. Our #1 need is still Oline...they can gel into a great line, but if the talent level on the oline is just average then they can never be a dominant line. If we can keep improving our boys up front then willis will only get better and better because of this. Right now hes a big part of the oline's good play and on a lot of his runs he has to do the work on his own and find his yards. That being said grab a stud OLman...this draft is deep on the line and hopefully well get 1 or 2 players who can come in and make an impact. then we need db, s, te, de, not in any specific order. This draft is real deep in dbacks and pass rushing DE/OLB type players so we should come out of the draft with some good young talent if our front office plays their cards right.
Typical TBD Guy Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 1. We won't find a difference-maker DE in round 2 or later 2. Free agent difference-maker DE's will be way too expensive for us. 3. With our current DE's as they are, and given the injuries to Milloy and Vincent throughout the season, we are still the #4 overall D, #4 in rushing and #9 in passing. Conclusion: In the salary cap era, we can't have All-Pros at every position. Schobel and Kelsay aren't future HOF'ers, but they'll do.
Recommended Posts