Another Point of View Posted September 22, 2010 Posted September 22, 2010 (edited) How many yards will Fitzpatrick have passing against New England? Edited September 22, 2010 by Another Point of View
bizell Posted September 22, 2010 Posted September 22, 2010 more yards than trent has had this entire year imo
metzelaars_lives Posted September 22, 2010 Posted September 22, 2010 How come there's no option for over 400 yards?
Phil Hansen Forever Posted September 22, 2010 Posted September 22, 2010 As long has Fitz gets more 1st Downs, I'm happy. This 3 and out crap had better stop this week. And for crying out, plant Brady in the ground at least once.
Another Point of View Posted September 22, 2010 Author Posted September 22, 2010 How come there's no option for over 400 yards? lol
Another Point of View Posted September 22, 2010 Author Posted September 22, 2010 As long has Fitz gets more 1st Downs, I'm happy. This 3 and out crap had better stop this week. And for crying out, plant Brady in the ground at least once. Agreed, but I think the team will rally around him.....we will see!
BfloBillsFan Posted September 22, 2010 Posted September 22, 2010 (edited) More then Trent has gotten in either game, but not enough to break the string of more than 300 yards! Edited September 22, 2010 by MotownBillsFan
Mr. WEO Posted September 22, 2010 Posted September 22, 2010 As long has Fitz gets more 1st Downs, I'm happy. This 3 and out crap had better stop this week. And for crying out, plant Brady in the ground at least once. The Bills had 14 first downs last week--only 4 fewer than GB.
Merle Haggard Posted September 22, 2010 Posted September 22, 2010 Probably around 100yd. With 80 of them coming in the 4th qtr as we attempt to overcome a 24 point deficit with 11 minutes to play. Sigh. We suck so fricken bad...
Another Point of View Posted September 22, 2010 Author Posted September 22, 2010 I went with 300-400 oh what the hell!!!
thebug Posted September 22, 2010 Posted September 22, 2010 I went with 300-400 oh what the hell!!! It's yards, not inches.
Another Point of View Posted September 22, 2010 Author Posted September 22, 2010 It's yards, not inches. 900 feet, I like that better
Stealth Posted September 22, 2010 Posted September 22, 2010 9/22 115 yards 1 td 3 ints sacked 4 times
Another Point of View Posted September 22, 2010 Author Posted September 22, 2010 9/22 115 yards 1 td 3 ints sacked 4 times No way Fitz gets sacked 4 times, you are thinking of Edwards
Pete Posted September 22, 2010 Posted September 22, 2010 5 people voted for 300-400 passing yards against the Pats?!?!?! I want whatever you are smoking. We couldn't pass for 300-400 yards in 2 games against the Pats
Like A Mofo Posted September 22, 2010 Posted September 22, 2010 320 yards: 180 to Buffalo WR's and 140 to NE CB's
Stealth Posted September 22, 2010 Posted September 22, 2010 No way Fitz gets sacked 4 times, you are thinking of Edwards You may want to look at his last few starts from last season. In the last 5 games he was sacked 15 times, on 119 attempts. Once every 8 pass attempts. On the + side he had 6 tds to 4 ints and avg'd 152ypg. I can see why people are so excited by Fitzpatrick. Maybe one day we'll get a real qb
5 Wide Posted September 23, 2010 Posted September 23, 2010 New England's cornerback situation is actually pretty awful. 286 yds, 2 TD 1 int
TheChimp Posted September 23, 2010 Posted September 23, 2010 No fair, there wasn't an option for negative yards. I predict an even worse performance from our *giggle* Offensive Line and at least 10 sacks against Fitz/Brohm.
lets_go_bills Posted September 23, 2010 Posted September 23, 2010 Where's the "less than 0" option? I'm predicting -12 yards passing and 8 yards running.
Recommended Posts