Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The obvious answer is yes, he will not get a new Deal.

 

Well, because he is a free agent in 2011, why bother keeping him around?

 

Laugh all you want but I bring in Jamarcus Russell. Yes that big fat lazy former #1 pick in the draft. I saw a thread were he lost 40lbs and is looking for another shot!

 

Either way Trent would not stay on My roster, nope,no way!

 

Okay, YOU DON'T LIKE RUSSELL...fine, there are some other options.

Edited by Another Point of View
Posted

The obvious answer is yes, he will not get a new Deal.

 

Well, because he is a free agent in 2011, why bother keeping him around?

 

Laugh all you want but I bring in Jamarcus Russell. Yes that big fat lazy former #1 pick in the draft. I saw a thread were he lost 40lbs and is looking for another shot!

 

Either way Trent would not stay on My roster, nope,no way!

 

A drug addict too. Yeah thats what we need

Posted

A drug addict too. Yeah thats what we need

 

 

At least he;d have a connection with one of our tightends... /points at Shawn Nelson

Posted

The obvious answer is yes, he will not get a new Deal.

 

Well, because he is a free agent in 2011, why bother keeping him around?

 

Laugh all you want but I bring in Jamarcus Russell. Yes that big fat lazy former #1 pick in the draft. I saw a thread were he lost 40lbs and is looking for another shot!

 

Either way Trent would not stay on My roster, nope,no way!

[This is an automated response]

 

This thread is in direct violation of point 1 of the new board what you can and can't talk about policy. Please delete this thread before it is physically removed from the premises. Thank you for your cooperation.

×
×
  • Create New...