RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Well, that is good to know... Chan sees the games too. I would say that is the end of the line for Trent.
wonderbread Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Just heard it.... link to follow Why? It doesn't matter.
McBeane Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Why? It doesn't matter. Then why would you waste your time posting in this thread?
wonderbread Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Then why would you waste your time posting in this thread? So I can read your insightful posts.
BuffaloBill Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 I thought Chan would give Edwards until the bye week but I'm happy he decided not to wait. I'd like to see Brohm in just to see what his upside is.
Virgil Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Then why would you waste your time posting in this thread? To be honest, I think this is too soon. I am not a Trent supporter, however I think that a lot of last week was more the OLine and WR than him. I don't think Trent is the answer, but I would have given him until week 4 and remove all doubt going forward. Sorry, just one bad game, two games into the season under the new regime seems like a coach feeling pressure move.
BuffaloWings Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Remember the saying: The most popular guy in town is the backup QB. You could see this coming, but I honestly didn't think it would be this quick. I figured Gailey might give him until the bye week, but I guess he's more impatient than I thought.
Wagon Circler Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Just texted me by my son. I may have to watch now. Texted to him by the Bills!
Recommended Posts