Brainiac72 Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 anyone notice the Bills offensive looked a lot better, at least initially, after Levitre went out? a few have been griping about his strength issues, and this may have backed that up. after Howard came in, who i admittedly did not think much of, we ran the ball down their throats for a while. put it this way, we certainly did not miss him. interesting.
Bob in STL Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 anyone notice the Bills offensive looked a lot better, at least initially, after Levitre went out? a few have been griping about his strength issues, and this may have backed that up. after Howard came in, who i admittedly did not think much of, we ran the ball down their throats for a while. put it this way, we certainly did not miss him. interesting. We ran the ball well for one series, then Green Bay adjusted and it was game over. We could have put Billy Shaw out there at LG and it would not matter, there are at least 5 players on our offense that are not good enough to be starters in the NFL (Edwards, Johnson, Stupar, Bell, and Green). We are that bad.
Conch Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 We ran the ball well for one series, then Green Bay adjusted and it was game over. We could have put Billy Shaw out there at LG and it would not matter, there are at least 5 players on our offense that are not good enough to be starters in the NFL (Edwards, Johnson, Stupar, Bell, and Green). We are that bad. Is he in game shape?
oak tree 12 Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 anyone notice the Bills offensive looked a lot better, at least initially, after Levitre went out? a few have been griping about his strength issues, and this may have backed that up. after Howard came in, who i admittedly did not think much of, we ran the ball down their throats for a while. put it this way, we certainly did not miss him. interesting. you are out of your mind or delusional. mayock had livitre rated the #1 guard in the draft. last year he was our best offensive lineman and made the all rookie team. you have no idea what you are talking about. if cordero was better he would be starting. really man start using your head a little.
bkc Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Hard to say not having film of every snapped howard had, but i will say this he didn't seem like a disaster out there . In the end that is a good thing depth is not a bad problem to have and at the end of the day handy will have to be replaced so if either Howard or the kid of the steelers practice squad can slide to guard so be it , one less problem to fill. wow we may have found one positvie is a horrid game
Brainiac72 Posted September 20, 2010 Author Posted September 20, 2010 you are out of your mind or delusional. mayock had livitre rated the #1 guard in the draft. last year he was our best offensive lineman and made the all rookie team. you have no idea what you are talking about. if cordero was better he would be starting. really man start using your head a little. well, you could say Levitre is a great NFL player because Mayock had him ranked good coming out of college... ...or you could watch him play and see the results. at best, there was no dropoff. which is actually "using your head"?
GR8PRKN Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 well, you could say Levitre is a great NFL player because Mayock had him ranked good coming out of college... ...or you could watch him play and see the results. at best, there was no dropoff. which is actually "using your head"? Yes there was he gave up a Sack....
bklnpete Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 you are out of your mind or delusional. mayock had livitre rated the #1 guard in the draft. last year he was our best offensive lineman and made the all rookie team. you have no idea what you are talking about. if cordero was better he would be starting. really man start using your head a little. Dude, ease up on the hostility, go rub one out or something.
Pirate Angel Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 anyone notice the Bills offensive looked a lot better, at least initially, after Levitre went out? a few have been griping about his strength issues, and this may have backed that up. after Howard came in, who i admittedly did not think much of, we ran the ball down their throats for a while. put it this way, we certainly did not miss him. interesting. We looked horrible the whole game besides 1 series. Levitre is one of the only bright spots on this team. If you felt we ran the ball down there throats at any point besides that one series...it was most likely because the Packers where up by 30 and we where still running the ball.
Rico Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Dude, ease up on the hostility, go rub one out or something. Something like go play in the traffic.
pimp on da' net Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 you are out of your mind or delusional. mayock had livitre rated the #1 guard in the draft. last year he was our best offensive lineman and made the all rookie team. you have no idea what you are talking about. if cordero was better he would be starting. really man start using your head a little. LMFAO.... LEVITRE HAS STRUGGLED EARLY ON, SWIPE YOUR EYES SOMETIME.
Recommended Posts