dave mcbride Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 NM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted September 20, 2010 Author Share Posted September 20, 2010 FYI - from Buffalo Rumblings yesterday: http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2010/9/19/1697646/mortensen-bills-packers-could-talk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 New Mexico? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddog69 Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 He should be the primary back with Freddy as the change of pace back. The FO should never have drafted Spiller, we should have Brian Bulaga starting at LT for us right now. He is good enough to play for GB, he is definitely better than Karl Malone Jr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 Why would Green Bay trade a starting-caliber OT for a running back in this league? I don't get it at all. If they want to overpay like that, they're more than welcome, but I don't think they'd at all be getting the kind of value you look for in a trade. I guess if they think Marshawn is a top-5 back on a terrible team, it's a possibility, but it's unlikely IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted September 20, 2010 Author Share Posted September 20, 2010 Why would Green Bay trade a starting-caliber OT for a running back in this league? I don't get it at all. If they want to overpay like that, they're more than welcome, but I don't think they'd at all be getting the kind of value you look for in a trade. I guess if they think Marshawn is a top-5 back on a terrible team, it's a possibility, but it's unlikely IMO. Lynch is a quality player, and they need a RB. They're hoping to go to the SB this year, and they need a horse. Whatever you think of Lynch as a person, he's a quality NFL RB. If I'm the Packers, why not give up TJ Lang ( http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=12680 )? He has some promise, but he's not a starter. From the Packers' perspective, it's a winner - they're getting a player at a position of need who's a better football player than the guy they're trading. From the Bills' perspective, it works too (although less well): they'd be getting an inferior player but at a position of desperate need and unloading a good player at a position they're overstocked at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 Lynch is a quality player, and they need a RB. They're hoping to go to the SB this year, and they need a horse. Whatever you think of Lynch as a person, he's a quality NFL RB. If I'm the Packers, why not give up TJ Lang ( http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=12680 )? He has some promise, but he's not a starter. From the Packers' perspective, it's a winner - they're getting a player at a position of need who's a better football player than the guy they're trading. From the Bills' perspective, it works too (although less well): they'd be getting an inferior player but at a position of desperate need and unloading a good player at a position they're overstocked at. Do you think OG is really a position of desperate need? I tend to think they are 'more OK' at the interior positions than at OT. I do think you're correct that this is more likely, though. I don't see GB giving up an OT. I like Lynch as a back, but I could deal with Lang and a draft pick that escalates with performance in a trade. I still think RBs are plentiful enough though that they could ride a guy like Joique Bell even to some success. Stranger things have happened. Slightly related question: can a team 'work out' a guy on another club's practice squad - kick the tires, so to speak? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted September 20, 2010 Author Share Posted September 20, 2010 Do you think OG is really a position of desperate need? I tend to think they are 'more OK' at the interior positions than at OT. I do think you're correct that this is more likely, though. I don't see GB giving up an OT. I like Lynch as a back, but I could deal with Lang and a draft pick that escalates with performance in a trade. I still think RBs are plentiful enough though that they could ride a guy like Joique Bell even to some success. Stranger things have happened. Slightly related question: can a team 'work out' a guy on another club's practice squad - kick the tires, so to speak? Lang has played some tackle for them, which means he's probably an upgrade over what we have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 FYI - from Buffalo Rumblings yesterday: http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2010/9/19/1697646/mortensen-bills-packers-could-talk I'd like to see the Bills make a move. (I like Lynch, but something needs to be done with OL, QB and LB.) However, I voted he will still be with the Bills, because I don't think they will make the trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts