BuffaloBaumer Posted September 14, 2010 Posted September 14, 2010 That would be my worst nightmare come true. Fitz as the starting QB and winning 6 games this season. Either Trent or Brohm winning 10-15 or Fitz winning 0-3
BobChalmers Posted September 14, 2010 Posted September 14, 2010 Oh yes - it's soooooooo much fun watching a QB badly miss the target on 1/2 his passes.
zer0vette Posted September 14, 2010 Posted September 14, 2010 (edited) Oh yes - it's soooooooo much fun watching a QB badly miss the target on 1/2 his passes. It's better to shoot and miss the target than to not even make an attempt to hit the target at all. Edited September 14, 2010 by zer0vette
reginald Posted September 14, 2010 Author Posted September 14, 2010 That would be my worst nightmare come true. Fitz as the starting QB and winning 6 games this season. Either Trent or Brohm winning 10-15 or Fitz winning 0-3 What??? Start your own thread then pal...this is about me, getting 6 wins, fitzy, and a grand+
Wagon Circler Posted September 14, 2010 Posted September 14, 2010 It's better to shoot and miss the target than to not even make an attempt to hit the target at all. Well said sir! You are correct.
dwy138 Posted September 14, 2010 Posted September 14, 2010 It's better to shoot and miss the target than to not even make an attempt to hit the target at all. could not have said it any better myself at least he tries ha
Maddog69 Posted September 14, 2010 Posted September 14, 2010 if you took the over with a 5.5 line, you are not winning. I don't care which of the 3 they have at QB, this team is not winning more than 3-4 games.
reginald Posted September 14, 2010 Author Posted September 14, 2010 if you took the over with a 5.5 line, you are not winning. I don't care which of the 3 they have at QB, this team is not winning more than 3-4 games. Alrigghttt Maddog69! Nice root against.
Maddog69 Posted September 14, 2010 Posted September 14, 2010 What part of my reponse tell you that I am rooting against them. I am not. I would love to see them run the table and go 15-1. But I am also a realist. They don't have the talent, especially at key positions to be competitive. I am still be at every home game screaming my head off and I will be pleasantly surprised on the rare ocassion that they win some games.
reginald Posted September 14, 2010 Author Posted September 14, 2010 What part of my reponse tell you that I am rooting against them. I am not. I would love to see them run the table and go 15-1. But I am also a realist. They don't have the talent, especially at key positions to be competitive. I am still be at every home game screaming my head off and I will be pleasantly surprised on the rare ocassion that they win some games. Forget all that nonsense...just get'em home Maddog69! With Fitzy scambling around, this team gets it's balls back, & a shot at 6 wins+.
buffaloaggie Posted September 14, 2010 Posted September 14, 2010 if you took the over with a 5.5 line, you are not winning. I don't care which of the 3 they have at QB, this team is not winning more than 3-4 games. Have to agree, especially with our schedule. I was counting on Chicago and Detroit wins, but I'm not even sure of that. It was a bad bet to pick the over, IMO. Fitzpatrick wouldn't make a difference with this OL.
nick in* england Posted September 14, 2010 Posted September 14, 2010 No no no no no no no. One game folks and you want to put in Fitzpatrick? I'm staggered Fitzpatrick is even on the roster. The guy is horrible as a starter. Give this new offence under Trent more than one game!
bladiebla Posted September 14, 2010 Posted September 14, 2010 If you'll change your bet to Fitz getting cut during the season i'll happilly support your motion...
reginald Posted September 15, 2010 Author Posted September 15, 2010 No no no no no no no. One game folks and you want to put in Fitzpatrick? I'm staggered Fitzpatrick is even on the roster. The guy is horrible as a starter. Give this new offence under Trent more than one game! Alright, one more start for Trent. I know a Fitzy led squad can win half it's games...so I'm okay with that.
Chattanooga Joe Posted September 15, 2010 Posted September 15, 2010 IMHO, Absolutely NOT, he probably would win 6 games and what good would that be! If anyone replaces Trent it has to be Brohm. At least he would have a chance to learn/show what he has and if he can cut it, because as everyone knows if you can do anything behind the OL the Bills have you can be great behind an average line. And if we go 1 and 15, the Bills get a shot at the best QB or OT in the draft! Except for a few teams you have to have 2 to 3 years of sub 4 wins to have the time to build through the draft if we can afford it, there is no way the Bills can afford to rebuild through FA.
loserlovers Posted September 15, 2010 Posted September 15, 2010 Have to agree, especially with our schedule. I was counting on Chicago and Detroit wins, but I'm not even sure of that. It was a bad bet to pick the over, IMO. Fitzpatrick wouldn't make a difference with this OL. so why did it make a difference last year? did u notice fitz won games? when did edwards last win with any line? Oh ya we were 5 and 1 once 5 and 1 ,woo hoo remember everyone????
milehiLou Posted September 15, 2010 Posted September 15, 2010 It's better to shoot and miss the target than to not even make an attempt to hit the target at all. that is wonderful! (is that ok simon?)
Conch Posted September 15, 2010 Posted September 15, 2010 if i were coach, i'd throw Brohm into the fire and tell him to either throw downfield or he's out. I'd bring Trent in to run the two minute drives and have several of them each half. I'd have Fitzy bring me water.
Recommended Posts