NaPolian8693 Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 Beebe's Kid - The only one that looks like a douche here is you. I thought the bump was pretty funny
KD in CA Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 Beebe's Kid - The only one that looks like a douche here is you. I thought the bump was pretty funny Agreed -- on both counts. As Joe requested, his words were marked!
truth on hold Posted October 7, 2010 Author Posted October 7, 2010 (edited) Yeah I'm the OP, so what? Im not afraid to make a bold prediction and put it out there. I'm right more often than wrong ... my winning percentage is almost 70% against the spread. As far as Sanchez, it's WAY TOO EARLY to call this one a done deal after only 4 games. Remember how good Trent looked after the Bills 5 & 1 start? Where's he now? But if you want to crown Sanchez' ass, then crown his ass ... lol. Bills knew who he was (5 picks), and they let him get away!!! Edited October 7, 2010 by Joe_the_6_pack
Alphadawg7 Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 Yeah I'm the OP, so what? Im not afraid to make a bold prediction and put it out there. I'm right more often than wrong ... my winning percentage is almost 70% against the spread. As far as Sanchez, it's WAY TOO EARLY to call this one a done deal after only 4 games. Remember how good Trent looked after the Bills 5 & 1 start? Where's he now? But if you want to crown Sanchez' ass, then crown his ass ... lol. Bills knew who he was (5 picks), and they let him get away!!! Come on now, let the Trent 5-1 start go. He did not look that good, not like Sanchez has been. Trent struggle mightily through large chunks of those games, but ST, our run game, and our D kept us close and even got some of those wins for us.
todd Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 I liked the original prediction because I wanted Sanchez to fail. Not because of Sanchez himself, but because I LOATHE Rayan. I think he's a douchebag prick mother!@#$er sonofabitch !@#$face. PS - SDS - I love the profanity filter. I can still get the satisfaction of typing swearwords, but still feel comfortable that they will be adjusted properly.
nedboy7 Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 such an interesting thread. next. wow winning percentage is 70%? you should be retired on an island not watching nfl.
Hapless Bills Fan Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 Hey I wasn't trying to be a douche, I was just trying to be funny....I thought we needed a little humor on this board with the way things are going. For what it's worth (I'm noted for an oddball sense of humor)............. I laughed
Leonidas II Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 Great call on this one sir!!!! Brunell did replace Sanchez after he was finished blowing out the Bills on Sunday!! Congrats on a correct prediction!! Well done. The lack of accountability on this board is startling most of the time.
coldstorage5 Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 Please man, Sanchez has no picks and his team is 3-1, Brunell is 40.... This is a a really dumb comment
IDBillzFan Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 Yeah I'm the OP, so what? Im not afraid to make a bold prediction and put it out there. I'm right more often than wrong ... my winning percentage is almost 70% against the spread. I'll bet you drive a BMW, don't you...
It's in My Blood Posted October 9, 2010 Posted October 9, 2010 (edited) Wrong on the prediction, absolutely right that the "Jets nation won't sit back and let Sanchez keep them from what they perceive as their year to win the Super Bowl". Unfortunately Sanchize has stepped up this year, while another young QB (Edwards) never did. Sigh. Edwards sucks. Ok we all know that. But when you can stick a qb behind a o-line like the jets have , a solid running game , and a defense that will rarely put the offense in tough spots , then you better believe the vast majority of 2nd year qbs should make leaps and bounds of improvement. Besides that , look at all the damn weapons he has .. the Jets are making it really hard for Sanchez to fail or even regress. And thats how it should be done. Edited October 9, 2010 by stevecana
Recommended Posts