The Senator Posted September 6, 2010 Posted September 6, 2010 (edited) I guess, if nothing else, Ralph is loyal to his employees. (Nothing against Fitz, just wish it was Chan making the QB decisions.) Edited September 6, 2010 by The Senator
Albany,n.y. Posted September 6, 2010 Posted September 6, 2010 Shocking? http://ow.ly/2Adrq The only thing I'm surprised at is the number of people here who couldn't see Fitz was always going to be here & be no worse than #2 QB on the depth chart.
notwoz Posted September 6, 2010 Posted September 6, 2010 Not surprised -- However, I will be surprised if he's still the No. 2 next year (and Trent Edwards is not part of this equation. Regardless of what happens with Trent, I don't expect the current braintrust to stand pat with the current QB lineup).
Albany,n.y. Posted September 6, 2010 Posted September 6, 2010 Not surprised -- However, I will be surprised if he's still the No. 2 next year #1 next year?
BfloBillsFan Posted September 6, 2010 Posted September 6, 2010 Shocking? http://ow.ly/2Adrq After what all the Qbs on the roster have shown this preseason, I would have to agree with the order. I may wish there were better options but Trent showed the most (maybe b/c he was with the starters, followed by Fitz then Brohm
Another Point of View Posted September 6, 2010 Posted September 6, 2010 Does this mean he will start the second half
Hapless Bills Fan Posted September 6, 2010 Posted September 6, 2010 Shocking? http://ow.ly/2Adrq Why would it even be surprising?
notwoz Posted September 6, 2010 Posted September 6, 2010 #1 next year? No. Either No. 3 or gone. Chan Gailey or Buddy Nix don't reveal their innermost thoughts to me, but I'm not sure they are all that comfortable with the current QB roster. I'm of the opinion that next year is the year they seek a true and legitimate upgrade to the QB position.
Recommended Posts