muddy waters Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 Not a surprise at all. Kinda think he might be a fun QB to put on the Bills' roster as a 3rd stringer rather than Brohm. Gailey could have some fun with him on the offenes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 I'm told we could have had him for a 4th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 I'm told we could have had him for a 4th Who told you? Georg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purple haze Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 I wouldn't mind seeing them bring on Troy. But depends on how tied they are to Brohm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddog69 Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 I think it would be great to bring him in. His mobility could fit nicely into what Chan likes to do on offense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloridaSnow Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 I think it would be great to bring him in. His mobility could fit nicely into what Chan likes to do on offense +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 Git er done... I can't believe Baltimore cut his arse. :sarcasm: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kota Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 Yes lets bring in a guy who was 3rd string QB and got cut. That makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sllib olaffub Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 If I were to bring him in I think he'd replace Fitz - merely because Brohm is promising as a true pocket passer, and Troy seems more mobile, more along the lines of what Fitz gives us, but hopefully more accurate. So, I'd love to see us with Edwards, Smith, and Brohm. It's starting to look like the Bills are handing the team over to Edwards, though. If he regresses it doesn't look like they would look to keep either Brohm or Fitz at QB, but just go after a franchise QB in next year's draft. I really see more in Brohm than a lot of people on this board, it seems. He's looked pretty good to me, and I'd give him a chance as a starter if Edwards were to falter. But, if Brohm is close to being good enough, and Smith is very similar - they're both thinking they want and deserve starter jobs. Edwards, Smith, and Brohm would be a team with three guys thinking they're 1st string. So, I think our F.O., merely for that reason, might stay away from Smith and go with Edwards or next year's first round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloaggie Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 Yes lets bring in a guy who was 3rd string QB and got cut. That makes sense. They decided to carry two QBs. He completed 64% of his passes and had a 93.9 rating in preseason. I think it makes a lot of sense to bring him in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddog69 Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 Yes lets bring in a guy who was 3rd string QB and got cut. That makes sense. Oh thats; right no NFL player has ever been cut by one team and gone on to play well with another. I sure hope Buddy doesn't bother looking at any of the crappy players that were cut today. I'll bet none of them get picked up since NFL teams cannot be that stupid, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Grid Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 If I were to bring him in I think he'd replace Fitz - merely because Brohm is promising as a true pocket passer, and Troy seems more mobile, more along the lines of what Fitz gives us, but hopefully more accurate. So, I'd love to see us with Edwards, Smith, and Brohm. It's starting to look like the Bills are handing the team over to Edwards, though. If he regresses it doesn't look like they would look to keep either Brohm or Fitz at QB, but just go after a franchise QB in next year's draft. I really see more in Brohm than a lot of people on this board, it seems. He's looked pretty good to me, and I'd give him a chance as a starter if Edwards were to falter. But, if Brohm is close to being good enough, and Smith is very similar - they're both thinking they want and deserve starter jobs. Edwards, Smith, and Brohm would be a team with three guys thinking they're 1st string. So, I think our F.O., merely for that reason, might stay away from Smith and go with Edwards or next year's first round pick. I think this is dead on. Fitz is who he'd replace. And anything that gets fitz off the roster is good by me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 They decided to carry two QBs. He completed 64% of his passes and had a 93.9 rating in preseason. I think it makes a lot of sense to bring him in. Yet they simply cut him. Why did that make sense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zulu Cthulhu Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 There is a sick infatuation with smith on this board that doesn't seem to be going away... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowery4 Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 That is true Zulu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobChalmers Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 Yes lets bring in a guy who was 3rd string QB and got cut. That makes sense. If you'd ever seen him play - and I mean in the NFL - you would know how much sense it would make. I'm not one for bringing in random QBs - the Leinart calls were comical - but Smith is plenty decent, I'd definitely take him over Fitz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts