John Cocktosten Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 I think your argument for why the beatles are great is directly contractictory to the thread. A band is over rated when they sell tons of albums, but are nothing but bubble gum pop. Hey Jude, really? I'm over 30, but the beatles are great to most of you because of the memories associated with them and their "legend". They are not a good band. Seriously, this post made me puke in my mouth . The Beatles were music. They created and refined almost every genre of music until it was perfect. They had 3 of the best writers and singers of all time. They were and remain the pinnacle for every band in regards to artistry. There is no comparison and by saying they are overrated you are just trying to get a reaction...and you did. Overrated: 1-Dave Mathews- every song sounds the same and his voice sounds like Kermti the Frog on Roids. 2-The Eagles- One great song and a bunch of crap after that. They are way better on an individual basis than they are together. 3-Zepplin- While individually they were some of the greatest musicians ever, they stole a ton of their music. 4-Anything Springstein - Super underrated voice and some great musicians in that band, but he's a classic example of why the great bands need multiple writers. 5 Pearl Jam- One great album. Their stuff is so dated when you go back and listen now.
rockpile Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 If you want to get really technical, the Beach Boys were ripping their **** off Chuck Berry, almost word for word, note for note The entire British Invasion and American rock and roll in general was "ripping off" old blues artists. The good ones started with the old blues riffs and updated the genre to make it their own (Eric Clapton, Led Zep, etc) I personally love the Beach Boys 'Holland' album. I had a great respect for Levon Helm of The Band, who threatened to walk away when producers were going to cut Muddy Waters out of 'The Last Waltz' and leave NEIL DIAMOND in! Muddy Waters and his peers were the foundation of The Band; a sound perfected with Ronnie Hawkins and Bob Dylan. MY Most Over Rated Band - The Bee Gees !
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 Seriously, this post made me puke in my mouth . The Beatles were music. They created and refined almost every genre of music until it was perfect. They had 3 of the best writers and singers of all time. They were and remain the pinnacle for every band in regards to artistry. There is no comparison and by saying they are overrated you are just trying to get a reaction...and you did. Overrated: 1-Dave Mathews- every song sounds the same and his voice sounds like Kermti the Frog on Roids. 2-The Eagles- One great song and a bunch of crap after that. They are way better on an individual basis than they are together. 3-Zepplin- While individually they were some of the greatest musicians ever, they stole a ton of their music. 4-Anything Springstein - Super underrated voice and some great musicians in that band, but he's a classic example of why the great bands need multiple writers. 5 Pearl Jam- One great album. Their stuff is so dated when you go back and listen now. I agree with your general statement about the Beatles, but you absolutely can't say they had 3 of the best singers of all time. It's just not true.
rockpile Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 I knew this thread was going to turn into a music pissing match. I kind of look at music like wine. You drink what you like and if others don't like it, hey all the more for you. Music is typically written to be enjoyed by those who like it and for them it typically makes them feel good, whether it's me sitting, relaxing and listening to Vivaldi or reliving my teenage angst and banging my head to The Who. Both of which by many (and even some here) can be considered overrated. What does that even mean, well I guess that means the person that considered them overrated didn't like them. Ok, fine but don't ever let me catch you drinking white zinfandel. You drink what you like and if you did not BYOB, you "love the one your with." LOL White Zin = BLL I always love to read threads that argue that if you LIKE something you are wrong. EX: You unmitigated moron - PINK is your favorite color!
bbb Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 Seriously, this post made me puke in my mouth . The Beatles were music. They created and refined almost every genre of music until it was perfect. They had 3 of the best writers and singers of all time. They were and remain the pinnacle for every band in regards to artistry. There is no comparison and by saying they are overrated you are just trying to get a reaction...and you did. Overrated: 1-Dave Mathews- every song sounds the same and his voice sounds like Kermti the Frog on Roids. 2-The Eagles- One great song and a bunch of crap after that. They are way better on an individual basis than they are together. 3-Zepplin- While individually they were some of the greatest musicians ever, they stole a ton of their music. 4-Anything Springstein - Super underrated voice and some great musicians in that band, but he's a classic example of why the great bands need multiple writers. 5 Pearl Jam- One great album. Their stuff is so dated when you go back and listen now. Couldn't disagree with you more about Springsteen. And, actually I think his voice is not good.....Now, it's like a worn in baseball mitt that feels just right, but when I first bought Born To Run because I heard it was great, I thought this guy has got to be kidding with that voice. I'd like to know which Bruce songs you think are so bad that he could have used another writer? But, I'm also curious about what the one great Eagles song is?
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 Couldn't disagree with you more about Springsteen. And, actually I think his voice is not good.....Now, it's like a worn in baseball mitt that feels just right, but when I first bought Born To Run because I heard it was great, I thought this guy has got to be kidding with that voice. I'd like to know which Bruce songs you think are so bad that he could have used another writer? But, I'm also curious about what the one great Eagles song is? Hotel California, I assume.
bbb Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 Hotel California, I assume. Actually, I was thinking it would be Take It Easy, because that was much earlier (and IMO better) than Hotel California.
Chef Jim Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 But, I'm also curious about what the one great Eagles song is? Probably the one that never got any airplay.
The Dean Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 (edited) Couldn't disagree with you more about Springsteen. And, actually I think his voice is not good.....Now, it's like a worn in baseball mitt that feels just right, but when I first bought Born To Run because I heard it was great, I thought this guy has got to be kidding with that voice. I'd like to know which Bruce songs you think are so bad that he could have used another writer? But, I'm also curious about what the one great Eagles song is? I'm no Eagles fan and I believe they are very overrated. With that said, there is probably at least one good song on most every Eagles albums (I don't know about the last one or two). Sometimes the songs sound better done by other, better, artists: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBNmtBpM-EE One very wimpy Eagles song, is actually a very good song...just wimpy: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x17uy7_the-eagles-i-cant-tell-you-why-live_music It strikes me that some songs you think really suck, turn out to be OK when performed by a good (and in this case VERY underrated) artist: Edited September 8, 2010 by The Dean
rockpile Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 I had three LPs by Black Oak Arkansas and I saw them live. We both must be living in our own private Idaho. What about Chicago? Do they not make the cut because they started as the Chicago Transit Authority? Not only do I have 2 Toronto albums, I've seen them live. Really simple criteria. To be overrated one has to have a hit(s), be highly touted and then proceed to suck or get unlistenable. Sounds like Rush to me... I guess it all boils down to the ears of the beholder... But first that beholder has to admit that the person/group's artwork was good at one time. IMO, all other arguing about the group/person is immaterial. OK, if there are going to be rules I do not want to play any more.
John Cocktosten Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 I agree with your general statement about the Beatles, but you absolutely can't say they had 3 of the best singers of all time. It's just not true. Paul and John go without saying (Don't let me Down and Hey Jude are perfect examples). I always loved George's voice too. It fit perfectly with the music and had a sincerity about it (Something and Here comes the Sun). Grant it, put his up against Areatha, Marvin or Etta and none of them can hold a stick. But with the greats in their genre, 3 of the best IMO. I'd like to know which Bruce songs you think are so bad that he could have used another writer? But, I'm also curious about what the one great Eagles song is? I don't think Bruce's songs are bad. Thunder Road, Badlands, Atlantic City and Born to Run are phenominal songs. The River is a perfect example of a great idea for a song that went the wrong way IMO. Great opening bu the hook and chorus fall flat. JMO...and I love his voice. There is a version of him coevering Jackie Wilson's "higher and Higher" that is awesome. The dde has serious range. I'm a sucker for Hotel California. The lyrics were dark and the duel solos were great.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 Bands I fricking DESPISE: Steely Dan -- shoot me in the head (the Cuervo Gold? really?) Fleetwood Mac -- If you're so !@#$ing miserable, why don't you shoot yourselves instead? Anyone who ever sang on American Idol -- die, die, die... Springsteen -- dude sings like he's constipated
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 Paul and John go without saying (Don't let me Down and Hey Jude are perfect examples). I always loved George's voice too. It fit perfectly with the music and had a sincerity about it (Something and Here comes the Sun). Grant it, put his up against Areatha, Marvin or Etta and none of them can hold a stick. But with the greats in their genre, 3 of the best IMO. Sorry, just have to disagree. Paul is a good singer, John was a VERY good singer. But compared to the likes of Freddie Mercury, Robert Plant, Steve Perry, Chris Cornell, Geoff Tate, etc...neither is truly in the pantheon of the greatest vocalists in rock history.
Rico Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 10 pages and I don't think anyone has mentioned The Police.
bbb Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 There is a version of him coevering Jackie Wilson's "higher and Higher" that is awesome. The dde has serious range. I'm a sucker for Hotel California. The lyrics were dark and the duel solos were great. Yeah, I got to see him doing Higher and Higher twice last year, and even with all his great songs, that was the song going thru my head for the next week. Hotel is great, but I think there are many great Eagles songs - what I call the Glenn Frey Trilogy - Take it Easy, Peaceful Easy Feeling, and Lyin Eyes..........Desperado is great. There are others. Now, crap like Witchy Woman, Somebody's gonna hurt someone (whatever that is called), etc. I hope to never hear again.
Peace Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 (edited) I'm no Eagles fan and I believe they are very overrated. With that said, there is probably at least one good song on most every Eagles albums (I don't know about the last one or two). Sometimes the songs sound better done by other, better, artists: I appreciate that the Eagles songs are simple musically--absolutely a 4 chord first position band--but those guys put together some beautiful songs in that simplicity. Are they one of the best ever? no. But they could write some pretty songs. Did stojan really say the Beatles weren't that good of a band? The Beatles? I have no nostalgia for them as I was not alive in 1970 when Let It Be (their last LP) came out. Paul McCartney is an amazing guitarist. Not styled like Clapton, Hendrix, or Eddie VH but amazing in his own way. Harrison can play too. Their voices (esp. Paul's) are great individually and can evoke emotion on any scale together. As songwriters, there isn't a band in the same galaxy as the Lennon-McCartney team. They are Mozart-Beehtoven-Bach musically. People will never forget the music they wrote, and rightfully so. And meanwhile George Harrison just happened to be penning little ditties like "Something," "Here Comes the Sun," "Taxman," "While My Guitar Gently Weeps." And you know EVERY one of those songs--and he's the worse of the 3 of them. Stop with the Beatles stuff. It gets you attention to be "the guy" who says they were no good but it's silly. Overrated: Grateful Dead. I don't get it at all and never have. Tom Petty too, though I love American Girl. Edited September 8, 2010 by Peace
bbb Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 10 pages and I don't think anyone has mentioned The Police. Wow - good call! They are the poster child for over-rated!
Rico Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 Wow - good call! They are the poster child for over-rated! Hard to believe they were playing some football stadiums a few years ago. Oh yeah, just got Social D tix for November, they are extremely underrated.
bbb Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 I appreciate that the Eagles songs are simple musically--absolutely a 4 chord first position band--but those guys put together some beautiful songs in that simplicity. Are they one of the best ever? no. But they could write some pretty songs. Did stojan really say the Beatles weren't that good of a band? The Beatles? I have no nostalgia for them as I was not alive in 1970 when Let It Be (their last LP) came out. Paul McCartney is an amazing guitarist. Not styled like Clapton, Hendrix, or Eddie VH but amazing in his own way. Harrison can play too. Their voices (esp. Paul's) are great individually and can evoke emotion on any scale together. As songwriters, there isn't a band in the same galaxy as the Lennon-McCartney team. They are Mozart-Beehtoven-Bach musically. People will never forget the music they wrote, and rightfully so. And meanwhile George Harrison just happened to be penning little ditties like "Something," "Here Comes the Sun," "Taxman," "While My Guitar Gently Weeps." And you know EVERY one of those songs--and he's the worse of the 3 of them. Stop with the Beatles stuff. It gets you attention to be "the guy" who says they were no good but it's silly. Overrated: Grateful Dead. I don't get it at all and never have. Tom Petty too, though I love American Girl. And, George's best stuff came after The Beatles. All Things Must Pass proved that he was so great and wasn't able to fully express himself with the band. This is one of the most beautiful songs ever:
Recommended Posts