Mr. WEO Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 (edited) Interesting contrarian point of view in SI: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/michael_rosenberg/09/02/locker/index.html?eref=sihp Edited September 2, 2010 by Mr. WEO
CarolinaBill Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 I'm going with Enderle right now, f*ck Locker
FightinIrishBills Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 Interesting contrarian point of view in SI: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/michael_rosenberg/09/02/locker/index.html?eref=sihp Quiet down, you might disrupt the "tank the season and take Jake Locker #1 overall!!!" crowd. This article pretty much sums up my feelings on Locker. People have been falling in love with his measurables without looking at his production. He's not a great decision-maker. He can be dynamic, but he also has been known to disappear in games. It's not like the Pac-10 has been fielding SEC-level defenses (USC excepted); he should be doing better against what he's been working with. Yeah, the Huskies have been all kinds of bad, but Locker has yet to prove that he's a stud QB.
Recommended Posts