Global Warming

[IDBillzFan]

And Bill Gates is part of this vast mmgw conspiracy also. Poor little conservatives, everyone is out to get you, lol

Well, I guess that settles it, then. Bill Gates believes in global warming, so it must be true.

 

You flaming libs sure have a funny way of picking and choosing which rich people you want to hate.

[Dave_In_Norfolk]

Better than choosing your boys hanniyy and limbaugh,

[Gary M]

Not that I believe for a minute that you would ever change your mind on this. But sure, we'll do this whole shebang one more time for the gipper.

 

Lay-mans terminology:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/how-do-we-know-that-recent-cosub2sub-increases-are-due-to-human-activities-updated/

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf

 

Technical..

http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_synthesis_report.htm

 

In my opinion, a society that does not trust and look to it's most intelligent members is !@#$ed.

Just read this: http://www.openletterfromscientists.com/

 

Tell me Rob's House, and the rest of you insane folks, why do you not listen to and respect the words of the most intelligent members of our society?

 

 

WNY was covered by glaciers at one time, was it SUV emissions that caused them to melt?

[3rdnlng]

Better than choosing your boys hanniyy and limbaugh,

 

Have you been getting tutored in "Inane Comments" by connor?

[Chef Jim]

Not that I believe for a minute that you would ever change your mind on this. But sure, we'll do this whole shebang one more time for the gipper.

 

Lay-mans terminology:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/how-do-we-know-that-recent-cosub2sub-increases-are-due-to-human-activities-updated/

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf

 

Technical..

http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_synthesis_report.htm

 

In my opinion, a society that does not trust and look to it's most intelligent members is !@#$ed.

Just read this: http://www.openletterfromscientists.com/

 

Tell me Rob's House, and the rest of you insane folks, why do you not listen to and respect the words of the most intelligent members of our society?

 

Do you think the CEOs of some of the most corrupt companies are intelligent? What the !@#$ does intellingence have to do with anything?

[....lybob]

Well, I guess that settles it, then. Bill Gates believes in global warming, so it must be true.

 

You flaming libs sure have a funny way of picking and choosing which rich people you want to hate.

 

Personally I don't accept Bill Gates as a authority in Global warming - just like I didn't accept Steve Wynn as a authority in National level economics policy- In fact I'm not down with the whole "he's rich so he must be smart we should listen with awed reverence" thing.

[Magox]

Personally I don't accept Bill Gates as a authority in Global warming - just like I didn't accept Steve Wynn as a authority in National level economics policy- In fact I'm not down with the whole "he's rich so he must be smart we should listen with awed reverence" thing.

At least you're consistent....

[drnykterstein]

What the !@#$ does intellingence have to do with anything?

I love you Republicans, in a ROFL sort of way.

[Chef Jim]

I love you Republicans, in a ROFL sort of way.

 

Republicans??

 

So answer my question, do you think some of the most corrupt CEOs are intelligent?

[drnykterstein]

Republicans??

 

So answer my question, do you think some of the most corrupt CEOs are intelligent?

Of course. Some are, but then again some CEO's are going to be schmucks who don't deserve the job they hold. Where are we going with this? After you reach a certain wealth threshold, in my opinion it is just human nature to care less an less about this earth that we all share. You've got yourself and your family taken care of, it's easy to stop caring about the rest of mankind as much.

[Magox]

I love you Republicans, in a ROFL sort of way.

And we love you in a Forrest Gump sort of way....

[Dave_In_Norfolk]

Classic Conservative statement, what Does intelligence have to do with anything? Lol

[Chef Jim]

Classic Conservative statement, what Does intelligence have to do with anything? Lol

 

So intelligent people are infallible, non-corruptible or cannot be influenced? And because they are intelligent we should believe everything they say ane follow them to the ends of the earth even on subjects they know very little about i.e. Bill Gates on global warming? I guess when you're an idiot you worship intelligent people.

[drnykterstein]

So intelligent people are infallible, non-corruptible or cannot be influenced? And because they are intelligent we should believe everything they say ane follow them to the ends of the earth even on subjects they know very little about i.e. Bill Gates on global warming? I guess when you're an idiot you worship intelligent people.

There is a different between "worship" and "respect the opinion of".

[Alaska Darin]

You've gone far beyond "respecting the opinions of", you blathering dolt.

[DC Tom]

There is a different between "worship" and "respect the opinion of".

 

Of course, your definition of "intelligent" is "unquestioningly believes global warming policy statements", so your preconceived notions are simply self-justifying, and hence bull ****.

 

And you wonder why everyone thinks you're a moron.

[Rob's House]

Not that I believe for a minute that you would ever change your mind on this. But sure, we'll do this whole shebang one more time for the gipper.

 

Lay-mans terminology:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/how-do-we-know-that-recent-cosub2sub-increases-are-due-to-human-activities-updated/

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf

 

Technical..

http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_synthesis_report.htm

 

In my opinion, a society that does not trust and look to it's most intelligent members is !@#$ed.

Just read this: http://www.openletterfromscientists.com/

 

Tell me Rob's House, and the rest of you insane folks, why do you not listen to and respect the words of the most intelligent members of our society?

Well Conner, I have to give you some credit for effort. However, offering this up as evidence is equivalent to the libs who point to FDR as an example of Keynesian success.

 

The first link read like a first year college students paper. A few stats and a molecular breakdown was better than the nothing, but not by much.

 

The second link doesn't really support your theory, but whatever.

 

The third was the real doozy. You're citing IPCC? Really? Isn't that kind of like citing Jayson Blair?

[Nanker]

Well, hey. It's the Summer of Recovery. Let's do a tour and promote it. They believed global warming. They've GOT to believe this.

After all, we're intelligent, and I can see the Rose Garden from my house!

[Booster4324]

The second link doesn't really support your theory, but whatever.

 

Holy ****, I just skimmed it, but that sure seems to actually trash Connors point if I read it right.

[Magox]

Holy ****, I just skimmed it, but that sure seems to actually trash Connors point if I read it right.

Does anyone actually believe that Conner fully reads much less understands what he links?

 

Water vapor constitutes Earth's most significant greenhouse gas, accounting for about 95% of Earth's greenhouse effect (5). Interestingly, many "facts and figures' regarding global warming completely ignore the powerful effects of water vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold.

 

Water vapor is 99.999% of natural origin. Other atmospheric greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and miscellaneous other gases (CFC's, etc.), are also mostly of natural origin (except for the latter, which is mostly anthropogenic).

 

Human activites contribute slightly to greenhouse gas concentrations through farming, manufacturing, power generation, and transportation. However, these emissions are so dwarfed in comparison to emissions from natural sources we can do nothing about, that even the most costly efforts to limit human emissions would have a very small-- perhaps undetectable-- effect on global climate.

 

Jesus Maria Cristo at least post a supportive link