erynthered Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 unfuggingbelievable. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/31/photos-most-polluted-plac_n_693008.html?alacarte=1
KD in CA Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 spending one day in Linfen is equivalent to smoking three packs of cigarettes Ouch.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 Ouch. That's what happens when a neo-fascist centralized government hell-bent on economic victory is willing to sacrifice ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to win. I can't believe they put LA on that list
DC Tom Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 LA and Phoenix? They might be bad, but they have nothing on Nor'ilsk (" Heavy metal pollution near Norilsk is so severe that it is now economically feasible to mine the soil." ) or Alang, India.
Peace Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 LA and Phoenix? They might be bad, but they have nothing on Nor'ilsk (" Heavy metal pollution near Norilsk is so severe that it is now economically feasible to mine the soil." ) or Alang, India. Even London doesn't belong. They obviously put a few in there for shock value. The industrial cities in Asia would crush that list.
BuffaloBill Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 LA and Phoenix? They might be bad, but they have nothing on Nor'ilsk (" Heavy metal pollution near Norilsk is so severe that it is now economically feasible to mine the soil." ) or Alang, India. Birmingham Al could be added to the list
ExiledInIllinois Posted September 1, 2010 Posted September 1, 2010 Birmingham Al could be added to the list Come on! No place in the US or Canada comes close to being put on that list... Ditto to what Peace and Tom said... Not even Lackawanna during its heyday... Okay, maybe 1948 Donora, PA...
Recommended Posts