DrDawkinstein Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Brandon Spikes, the Pats* MLB, was allegedly taped on Chat Roullete with a female. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/30/brandon-spikes-naked-chat_n_700008.html While it hasn't been proven to be him yet, the visual evidence is pretty conclusive. Could/Would he be suspended by Goodell for something like this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbonestake Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Brandon Spikes, the Pats* MLB, was allegedly taped on Chat Roullete with a female. http://www.huffingto...t_n_700008.html While it hasn't been proven to be him yet, the visual evidence is pretty conclusive. Could/Would he be suspended by Goodell for something like this? Depends on the quality of the tape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 While it may be dumb of him to allow himself to be taped, why would this be a suspendable offense? NFL players can't have sex with sluts anymore? Granted, I could imagine the team and the league saying, "Brandon, don't be a moron.", but suspend him? Unless I am missing something about Chatroulette, they are not prostitutes or anything, this was just some girl he met on the site. If, of course, it was him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 But he told me he loved me and promised it would never get out to the public Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted August 31, 2010 Author Share Posted August 31, 2010 While it may be dumb of him to allow himself to be taped, why would this be a suspendable offense? NFL players can't have sex with sluts anymore? Granted, I could imagine the team and the league saying, "Brandon, don't be a moron.", but suspend him? Unless I am missing something about Chatroulette, they are not prostitutes or anything, this was just some girl he met on the site. If, of course, it was him. thats why i ask if you think he will be suspended. sure, its not a prostitute or anything, but Goodell has clamped down hard on the Conduct Policy, and I'm not sure that broadcasting yourself performing sex acts fits under the policy. Didn't one of the Dlineman for Arizona get in trouble for putting a naked pic out on the web recently? (I dont remember the details, looking now) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeMonkey Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 (edited) While it may be dumb of him to allow himself to be taped, why would this be a suspendable offense? NFL players can't have sex with sluts anymore? Granted, I could imagine the team and the league saying, "Brandon, don't be a moron.", but suspend him? Unless I am missing something about Chatroulette, they are not prostitutes or anything, this was just some girl he met on the site. If, of course, it was him. King Roger suspended Big Ben remember for 4-6 games this season and he was never charged, let alone convicted, of any crime. His only offense seemed to be having sex with a drunk, underage (though he probably had no way to know that) girl in a bar bathroom (as well as previous similar situations in the past) King Roger can suspend for any reason he chooses if he thinks it violates the so called conduct policy. Edited August 31, 2010 by CodeMonkey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eSJayDee Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 If he didn't play for the Pats*, quite possibly. Since he's a Cheatriot, HIGHLY unlikely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 King Roger suspended Big Ben remember for 4-6 games this season and he was never charged, let alone convicted, of any crime. His only offense seemed to be having sex with a drunk, underage (though he probably had no way to know that) girl in a bar bathroom. King Roger can suspend for any reason he chooses if he thinks it violates the so called conduct policy. That's an entirely different circumstance because he forced a drunk under-drinking age girl into the bathroom, by all reasonable accounts, and had a history of fukktarditis. While it's true that Goodell can do whatever he wants, there is zero chance IMO the union would let him suspend a player for consensual sex. We don't even know if he knew it was being taped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeMonkey Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 (edited) That's an entirely different circumstance because he forced a drunk under-drinking age girl into the bathroom, by all reasonable accounts, and had a history of fukktarditis. While it's true that Goodell can do whatever he wants, there is zero chance IMO the union would let him suspend a player for consensual sex. We don't even know if he knew it was being taped. The whole "forced" issue was talked to death before. But the fact remains he was never charged much less convicted of anything. So Goodell suspending Ben for being a !@#$tard would be no different than suspending this guy for also being a !@#$tard if he felt it was warranted and it really was him as you suggested. Edited August 31, 2010 by CodeMonkey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PS 56 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Depends on the quality of the tape Too funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbonestake Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Too funny Was the producer Ed Wang? Brandon Spikes stars in "Varsity Blue Balls" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 While it may be dumb of him to allow himself to be taped, why would this be a suspendable offense? NFL players can't have sex with sluts anymore? Granted, I could imagine the team and the league saying, "Brandon, don't be a moron.", but suspend him? Unless I am missing something about Chatroulette, they are not prostitutes or anything, this was just some girl he met on the site. If, of course, it was him. Do people have to be 18 to sign up for chat roulette? Yeah, I know that never stops the kids anyway, but if there is no age restriction on the site, I could imagine there might be some trouble with potentially supplying pornography to minors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 The whole "forced" issue was talked to death before. But the fact remains he was never charged much less convicted of anything. So Goodell suspending Ben for being a !@#$tard would be no different than suspending this guy for also being a !@#$tard if he felt it was warranted and it really was him as you suggested. Of course it's different, and far different. It's Pacman syndrome. Bonehead Ben had a long history of allegations. And while you give a lot of credence to the fact that he was never charged, you are not giving any credence to the fact that it's rather obvious what happened (up until what actually happened inside the bathroom). And it's 100 times worse than what we saw of Brandon Spikes, who basically had sex with a girl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted August 31, 2010 Author Share Posted August 31, 2010 Do people have to be 18 to sign up for chat roulette? Yeah, I know that never stops the kids anyway, but if there is no age restriction on the site, I could imagine there might be some trouble with potentially supplying pornography to minors. there has been a lot written lately about this. there are lots of underage people on chatroullete and there are also a lot of anonymous naked dudes whacking off as you cycle through chat partners. something will be done about it soon im sure. but for now, its pretty much a free for all. you can be sure that there are minors being exposed to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 there has been a lot written lately about this. there are lots of underage people on chatroullete and there are also a lot of anonymous naked dudes whacking off as you cycle through chat partners. something will be done about it soon im sure. but for now, its pretty much a free for all. you can be sure that there are minors being exposed to it. No doubt. Kids can get to any of this stuff ridiculously easily. It's hard to go after anyone but the site if these people don't show their faces though. It sounds like Spikes' dumbest move may have been putting himself in a spot where he was easily identifiable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson from Gamehendge Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 I have recently seen this...and I can say for sure that... A. It really is NOT a big deal...Spikes hardely even shows himself, yes you see his tool, but not very much. B. The chick is EXTREMELY HOT...Looks A LOT like Kim Kardashian. C. There is no sex...Some minor oral sex...his thing and her hooters. I would not classify this as a "Sex-Tape." It sure is worth the watch though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Turk Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 While it may be dumb of him to allow himself to be taped, why would this be a suspendable offense? NFL players can't have sex with sluts anymore? Granted, I could imagine the team and the league saying, "Brandon, don't be a moron.", but suspend him? Unless I am missing something about Chatroulette, they are not prostitutes or anything, this was just some girl he met on the site. If, of course, it was him. Goodell thought his "performance" was embarrassing for the NFL. He expects guys to last a lot longer than that if they are gonna be on tape... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 OK, I read the link, but still have the question, what is chat roulette? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notwoz Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 Goodell has clamped down hard on the Conduct Policy, and I'm not sure that broadcasting yourself performing sex acts fits under the policy. A lot of companies have personal conduct policies. And a lot of companies that have personal conduct policies will fire your butt in the blink of an eye if they think your behavior is going to cast them in a bad light. The NFL is no different -- or it shouldn't be. So if this bozo Spikes is stupid enough to put himself on the internet getting his rocks off with some two-bit slut then he deserves to be punished. I mean if he wants to have sex with useless tramps, then he can hang out with Big Ben. The NFL has a a good thing going -- and a lot at stake -- financially. It doesn't want some horny jagoff to spoil that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbonestake Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 A lot of companies have personal conduct policies. And a lot of companies that have personal conduct policies will fire your butt in the blink of an eye if they think your behavior is going to cast them in a bad light. The NFL is no different -- or it shouldn't be. So if this bozo Spikes is stupid enough to put himself on the internet getting his rocks off with some two-bit slut then he deserves to be punished. I mean if he wants to have sex with useless tramps, then he can hang out with Big Ben. The NFL has a a good thing going -- and a lot at stake -- financially. It doesn't want some horny jagoff to spoil that. Whoa Whoa Whoa Miss Lippy! Take it down a notch partner. Didn't you hear that the chick was hot? And another thing, don't lump him in with Big Ben. Now you just sound silly. By your standards, you should suspend Aaron Maybin for his Puerto Rican romp! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts