\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted August 30, 2010 Posted August 30, 2010 http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599201433200
Cugalabanza Posted August 30, 2010 Posted August 30, 2010 Yyyyyessss! Oh man, I really needed some good news today.
Pete Posted August 30, 2010 Posted August 30, 2010 (edited) I will drink to that....heavily Edited August 30, 2010 by Pete
bbb Posted August 30, 2010 Posted August 30, 2010 Uh, I'm no researcher, but isn't this a major flaw: The sample of those who were studied included individuals between ages 55 and 65 who had had any kind of outpatient care in the previous three years. The 1,824 participants were followed for 20 years. So, it's excluding all who died from the carnage of drunk driving before age 55.........As well as all those who died from cirossis, etc. before that age........I know somebody who died last week, of complications from diabetes. He didn't let his diabetes inhibit his wine intake. Now, he's dead. But, since he was only 47, he doesn't get included in this sample. Is this not a major flaw in the study?
The Dean Posted August 30, 2010 Posted August 30, 2010 (edited) Uh, I'm no researcher, but isn't this a major flaw: The sample of those who were studied included individuals between ages 55 and 65 who had had any kind of outpatient care in the previous three years. The 1,824 participants were followed for 20 years. So, it's excluding all who died from the carnage of drunk driving before age 55.........As well as all those who died from cirossis, etc. before that age........I know somebody who died last week, of complications from diabetes. He didn't let his diabetes inhibit his wine intake. Now, he's dead. But, since he was only 47, he doesn't get included in this sample. Is this not a major flaw in the study? Ya know, I'm right at the front of the line when it comes to calling into question the results of "research" trumpeted on TV, in newspapers, on the Internet, etc. I usually say, "Show me the methodology, the research instruments and the data. I'll tell you the take-away from the study." But for some reason, when the results suggest booze and/or drugs are good for you, I'm a true believer! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjVfc8-Y7sQ Edited August 30, 2010 by The Dean
5 Wide Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 That's b/c the heavy drinkers pile their cars into the sober ones.... the data is skewed
stevestojan Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 Uh, I'm no researcher, but isn't this a major flaw: The sample of those who were studied included individuals between ages 55 and 65 who had had any kind of outpatient care in the previous three years. The 1,824 participants were followed for 20 years. So, it's excluding all who died from the carnage of drunk driving before age 55.........As well as all those who died from cirossis, etc. before that age........I know somebody who died last week, of complications from diabetes. He didn't let his diabetes inhibit his wine intake. Now, he's dead. But, since he was only 47, he doesn't get included in this sample. Is this not a major flaw in the study? And who the hell are YOU to argue with RESEARCH???
Chef Jim Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 Uh, I'm no researcher, but isn't this a major flaw: The sample of those who were studied included individuals between ages 55 and 65 who had had any kind of outpatient care in the previous three years. The 1,824 participants were followed for 20 years. So, it's excluding all who died from the carnage of drunk driving before age 55.........As well as all those who died from cirossis, etc. before that age........I know somebody who died last week, of complications from diabetes. He didn't let his diabetes inhibit his wine intake. Now, he's dead. But, since he was only 47, he doesn't get included in this sample. Is this not a major flaw in the study? Hey you, shut the !@#$ up, we're drinking here.......and heavily!
bbb Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 Hey you, shut the !@#$ up, we're drinking here.......and heavily! I hope you're between 55 and 65. If so,
The Dean Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 I hope you're between 55 and 65. If so, Between 55 and 85, actually.
bbb Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 Between 55 and 85, actually. Sorry, I shouldn't have left you out!
stevestojan Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 I hope you're between 55 and 65. If so, I'm 30, but according to my doctor, I have the liver of a 60 year old. So, bottoms up!
TheChimp Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 Uh, I'm no researcher, but isn't this a major flaw: The sample of those who were studied included individuals between ages 55 and 65 who had had any kind of outpatient care in the previous three years. The 1,824 participants were followed for 20 years. So, it's excluding all who died from the carnage of drunk driving before age 55.........As well as all those who died from cirossis, etc. before that age........I know somebody who died last week, of complications from diabetes. He didn't let his diabetes inhibit his wine intake. Now, he's dead. But, since he was only 47, he doesn't get included in this sample. Is this not a major flaw in the study? Shudddup with yer straw in the floody, burp.
Chef Jim Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 I'm 30, but according to my doctor, I have the liver of a 60 year old. So, bottoms up! You might want to give it back, I hear he's looking for it.
Astrojanitor Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599201433200 If I wanted to live longer I wouldn't drink like this. Stupid yahoo
Recommended Posts