Merle Haggard Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 Hi guys! I'm new here and am curious if you guys think that our current roster of QBs would actually start for any other teams. Please vote. Thanks guys. Looking forward to many interesting discussions regarding our Bills.
Phil Hansen Forever Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 Perhaps Brohm, provided he actually gets to show off his talents. Otherwise, they are all backups.
Merle Haggard Posted August 28, 2010 Author Posted August 28, 2010 Perhaps Brohm, provided he actually gets to show off his talents. Otherwise, they are all backups. I'm not sure what some of you guys see in Brohm. He seems like a life long back up to me. I find it very unfortunate that we ignored the QB situation this offseason. Big mistake that we will pay dearly for.
Pilsner Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 Hi guys! I'm new here and am curious if you guys think that our current roster of QBs would actually start for any other teams. Please vote. Thanks guys. Looking forward to many interesting discussions regarding our Bills. No way would they start on other teams. But they are on our team and they are our qb's. So we might as well support them as best we can.
Merle Haggard Posted August 28, 2010 Author Posted August 28, 2010 No way would they start on other teams. But they are on our team and they are our qb's. So we might as well support them as best we can. Yeah, I hear ya....sort of like being forced to eat liver or spinach when we were kids. LOL. Our QBs are awful. Lets hope that one year soon we will once again sign a real QB. Sheesh.
crazyDingo Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 START for other teams or make their roster? No to both.
Merle Haggard Posted August 28, 2010 Author Posted August 28, 2010 START for other teams or make their roster? No to both. Sadly you are spot on here. Unfricken believable is it not?
Chilly Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 Where's the "They would start for Arizona" option?
Pilsner Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 Where's the "They would start for Arizona" option? LOL it does look pretty grim there doesn't it.
Merle Haggard Posted August 28, 2010 Author Posted August 28, 2010 (edited) Where's the "They would start for Arizona" option? None of them would start for Arizona. Nuff said. LOL. Edited August 28, 2010 by Merle Haggard
Chilly Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 None of them would start for Arizona. Nuff said. LOL. I take it you haven't seen them in pre-season this year.
Kelly the Dog Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 Where's the "They would start for Arizona" option? Definitely Arizona. I could see Trent beating out Jake Delhomme in Browns camp. Maybe even Matt Moore, although I doubt it. Granted, the answer to the OP's question is "one, maybe two, no more than three."
Merle Haggard Posted August 28, 2010 Author Posted August 28, 2010 I take it you haven't seen them in pre-season this year. And our QBs have looked sensational this preseason???! LOL. The fact that my poll is a landslide thus far for those who think none of our trio would start for any other team says it all.
Chilly Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 And our QBs have looked sensational this preseason???! LOL. The fact that my poll is a landslide thus far for those who think none of our trio would start for any other team says it all. Yeah, because your poll answers were totally unbiased.
Kelly the Dog Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 And our QBs have looked sensational this preseason???! LOL. The fact that my poll is a landslide thus far for those who think none of our trio would start for any other team says it all. I don't think our QBs are any good either, although the jury is still (somewhat) out. I wouldn't, however, trade a bag of sore !@#$s for Derek Anderson to replace our guy, and Anderson will be starting in AZ.
disco Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 It's a bit of an unfair question. Would another team pick up any of our guys to start? No, they're not. Nobody's hooking their wagon onto one of our outcasts. BUT, let's pretend they were already on another team's roster with an open QB spot. There's still very few teams that could be considered: Arizona - Anderson/Leinart. Yes! There is a real chance one of our guys could start in Arizona! Carolina - Moore/Clausen. Yes! They've been pretty terrible! One of our guys could probably compete in that rotation. Tampa Bay - Carpenter/Johnson. With the injury to Josh Freeman, one of our guys could probably compete for the fill-in time. Not once Freeman returns. Oakland - Jason Campbell. Possibly I suppose, but Campbell has performed well thus far. Cleveland - Jake Delhomme. With the money they spent on him, perhaps a TE could step up in the face of a Delhomme meltdown. Minnesota - Brett Favre/Tarvaris Jackson. If Favre wasn't there, I bet one of our guys could have as much a shot as Tarvaris. Jacksonville - David Garrard. Possibly if Garrard struggles as he did last year. I think that's it. Of the 31 other teams, I think 24 are essentially locked down at QB. This includes the assumption that a team like the Rams w/ a high profile new QB wouldn't bother starting one of our guys, even if Bradford might be early in development. Of the 7 remaining listed above, I think 5 are more or less locked up. Which leaves just 2. But hey! I think one of our guys would have at least a shot on Arizona or Carolina. I think our QB situation really is that bad. We're in the bottom 10 percentile of QBs in this league.
Merle Haggard Posted August 28, 2010 Author Posted August 28, 2010 It's a bit of an unfair question. Would another team pick up any of our guys to start? No, they're not. Nobody's hooking their wagon onto one of our outcasts. BUT, let's pretend they were already on another team's roster with an open QB spot. There's still very few teams that could be considered: Arizona - Anderson/Leinart. Yes! There is a real chance one of our guys could start in Arizona! Carolina - Moore/Clausen. Yes! They've been pretty terrible! One of our guys could probably compete in that rotation. Tampa Bay - Carpenter/Johnson. With the injury to Josh Freeman, one of our guys could probably compete for the fill-in time. Not once Freeman returns. Oakland - Jason Campbell. Possibly I suppose, but Campbell has performed well thus far. Cleveland - Jake Delhomme. With the money they spent on him, perhaps a TE could step up in the face of a Delhomme meltdown. Minnesota - Brett Favre/Tarvaris Jackson. If Favre wasn't there, I bet one of our guys could have as much a shot as Tarvaris. Jacksonville - David Garrard. Possibly if Garrard struggles as he did last year. I think that's it. Of the 31 other teams, I think 24 are essentially locked down at QB. This includes the assumption that a team like the Rams w/ a high profile new QB wouldn't bother starting one of our guys, even if Bradford might be early in development. Of the 7 remaining listed above, I think 5 are more or less locked up. Which leaves just 2. But hey! I think one of our guys would have at least a shot on Arizona or Carolina. I think our QB situation really is that bad. We're in the bottom 10 percentile of QBs in this league. Thanks for the detailed analysis. I suppose if the stars did align perfectly and pigs did fly, one of our QB's could start somewhere. LOL. Make it a great evening!
Merle Haggard Posted August 28, 2010 Author Posted August 28, 2010 Amazing 10 out of 13 voters thus far believe our trio of QBs could not start on any other NFL team. Pathetic.
Merle Haggard Posted August 28, 2010 Author Posted August 28, 2010 Lets get some more votes logged in please. Thanks guys.
Merle Haggard Posted August 28, 2010 Author Posted August 28, 2010 Yeah, because your poll answers were totally unbiased. Just callin' 'em like I see 'em guy. Does your response inicate that you are okay with our current QB corp? LOL.
Recommended Posts