tomdayfan Posted August 25, 2010 Posted August 25, 2010 If I had known the city had died, I'd have sent flowers Hey Buffalo, sorry to hear you died
Pete Posted August 25, 2010 Posted August 25, 2010 What about East Saint Louis? Gary, Indiana? Camden, New Jersey? Belle Glade, Florida? Well I guess it is good for Buffalo to be #1 at something
DrDawkinstein Posted August 25, 2010 Posted August 25, 2010 What about East Saint Louis? Gary, Indiana? Camden, New Jersey? Belle Glade, Florida? Well I guess it is good for Buffalo to be #1 at something those cities are all "never was"s. better to be a has-been i guess.
Dante Posted August 25, 2010 Posted August 25, 2010 A little while ago Stockton, Ca out here was rated one of, if not the worst place to live in the US. I guess it doesn't necessarily mean death though.
boyst Posted August 26, 2010 Posted August 26, 2010 It always seems to me that magazines post these lists every so often to draw attention to themselves. In one paper it is Detroit, in another St. Louis, another and another and another. Maybe next year Buffalo will be on the most depressing cities with a 42" waistline above the Mason-Dixon line? I am sure Buffalo is not in its prime but most dead? Who can really judge that?
el Tigre Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 It always seems to me that magazines post these lists every so often to draw attention to themselves. In one paper it is Detroit, in another St. Louis, another and another and another. Maybe next year Buffalo will be on the most depressing cities with a 42" waistline above the Mason-Dixon line? I am sure Buffalo is not in its prime but most dead? Who can really judge that? Exactly right.These type of negative articles are really useless. Any place you live is only as good or bad as you make it for yourself.
Recommended Posts