/dev/null Posted August 23, 2010 Posted August 23, 2010 http://www.armytimes.com/news/2010/08/dn-brigades-stay-under-different-name-081910/
Frit0 Bandit0 Posted August 24, 2010 Posted August 24, 2010 A rose by any other name Yes and no The Army is now going to implement and "field test" a new security force doctrine Security Force Assistance This should actually be important and in the developmental stage .. No better way to train for the future then where were at right now .... imo
DC Tom Posted August 24, 2010 Posted August 24, 2010 http://www.armytimes.com/news/2010/08/dn-brigades-stay-under-different-name-081910/ Yeah...no ****. This is a surprise? Hell, when they announced the "last combat troops" leaving Iraq, they notably caveated it with "but the remaining troops will still be used for combat."
Frit0 Bandit0 Posted August 24, 2010 Posted August 24, 2010 Yeah...no ****. This is a surprise? Hell, when they announced the "last combat troops" leaving Iraq, they notably caveated it with "but the remaining troops will still be used for combat." Wait till the 2011 deadline when we leave behind the 35,000 "Army missionary non combat force tactical firepower enhanced detachment" ...it's a new mos they're working on
....lybob Posted August 24, 2010 Posted August 24, 2010 Does anyone know how many contractors are going to be in Iraq - I've seen numbers of between 100,000 and 150,000 and I've read that the number is going to increase.
Frit0 Bandit0 Posted August 24, 2010 Posted August 24, 2010 Does anyone know how many contractors are going to be in Iraq - I've seen numbers of between 100,000 and 150,000 and I've read that the number is going to increase. What kind of contractor, or just contractors in general..do you you mean just US contractors and US contractor paid for by the gov., or private commercial companies
Recommended Posts