C.Biscuit97 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 When you noted that Trent was a 3rd rounder and Locker might be the #1 overall, you know what you did? You made a comparison between the two. To phrase it better, they both played on talent offenses. But Trent was a guy who didn't produce a lot but was thought to have upside and MIGHT be a good investment as a 3rd rounder. Locker has produced and talent wise is thought of one of the most physically gifted QBs in a very long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 To phrase it better, they both played on talent offenses. But Trent was a guy who didn't produce a lot but was thought to have upside and MIGHT be a good investment as a 3rd rounder. Locker has produced and talent wise is thought of one of the most physically gifted QBs in a very long time. At least you got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 To phrase it better, they both played on talent offenses. But Trent was a guy who didn't produce a lot but was thought to have upside and MIGHT be a good investment as a 3rd rounder. Locker has produced and talent wise is thought of one of the most physically gifted QBs in a very long time. Trent played on a talented offense at Stanford? I didn't realize that. Is that really true? At least you got it. Okay. What am I missing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 To phrase it better, they both played on talent offenses. But Trent was a guy who didn't produce a lot but was thought to have upside and MIGHT be a good investment as a 3rd rounder. Locker has produced and talent wise is thought of one of the most physically gifted QBs in a very long time. What has Locker produced? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Trent played on a talented offense at Stanford? I didn't realize that. Is that really true? Okay. What am I missing? Mistyped. I meant talentless. I don't one player from Trent's Stanford's or Locker's Washington's offenses in the pros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Maybe I'm missing something but this thread is surreal. it's a pissy one isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Okay. What am I missing? Not much, really. C Biscuit said "There is no comparison between the 2", but had just made a comparison between the two. It was just silly, really, Trent played on a talented offense at Stanford? I didn't realize that. Is that really true? I saw him play quite a bit while he was at Stanford, and I remember him being quite talented and the team being quite awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 C Biscuit said "There is no comparison between the 2", but had just made a comparison between the two. It was just silly, really, Okay. Thanks Dean. So while I'm updating my index of closely-held football opinions, is there or is there not a comparison between the two? Anxiously awaiting your clarification of this most important of matters. Sincerely, San Jose Bills Fan Okay. Thanks Dean. So while I'm updating my index of closely-held football opinions, is there or is there not a comparison between the two? Anxiously awaiting your clarification of this most important of matters. Sincerely, San Jose Bills Fan I think I need a good night's sleep tonight. That's not even funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Okay. Thanks Dean. So while I'm updating my index of closely-held football opinions, is there or is there not a comparison between the two? Anxiously awaiting your clarification of this most important of matters. Sincerely, San Jose Bills Fan I think I need a good night's sleep tonight. That's not even funny. The point, I think, is there can always be a comparison between two things. Comparing two things doesn't mean equating two things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 To phrase it better, they both played on talent offenses. But Trent was a guy who didn't produce a lot but was thought to have upside and MIGHT be a good investment as a 3rd rounder. Locker has produced and talent wise is thought of one of the most physically gifted QBs in a very long time. It's been a while and I may not be remembering correctly, but I don't think that's true. Before the draft there were a lot of people who though Trent was going to be a second round pick (maybe higher). That's why they had the camera on him all day and kept talking about being surprised he was dropping so far. Not that that really makes a big difference in the overall conversation... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PDaDdy Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Man you guys are bored. "No comparison" is a figure of speech. Don't bother entertaining the sill troll. He already knows it's a figure of speech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts