Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Problem is they've had 10 years to PLUG HOLES and we now have more holes than a block of swiss cheese. How many times am I gonna hear "can't be done in a year" or "takes 2-3 years for a rebuild to come together" or "I have a wait and see attitude" or "it's only the first pre/reg/season game, first year, second year etc" or "there was no good free agents or draft picks where we picked anyway" ,so lets get another RB when we have 2 starters.

As long as Ralph has fans like you who make excuses for the terrible decisions made by HIS staff year after year he's got no reason to change the way he runs the team. False hope, marketing gimmicks are provided by OBD each year and the lemmings continue to jump over the cliff.

Au contrare mon frere. You can B word and moan all you want, but the Bills are what they are. They are where they are. 10 years later, THIS IS WHAT WE GOT!! This is year one of this regime. They have had less than a year to assemble this team. That being said, if next year looks like last year, rest assured my season tix count will go down. I don't make excuses for anyone. But if you think that fans have anything to do with the direction of the team, you are delusional.

 

Likewise, if you think they could have secured a QB, LT, RT, 2 WRs, a TE, a Defensive line and at least 2 starting LBs in 1 year, back off the hooka.

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Gailey/Nix have no one to blame but themselves. Even if that quote is from months ago, they knew full well we needed OL and QB help above all else. They neglected both and took a huge gamble on the luxury pick Spiller above a potential franchise Qb and/or building the OL. They passed on Clausen and more quality OL prospects in round 2 also (at least Troup was a need fill). To argue that there "was no value at OL/QB" at our picks of 9 and 42 is assinine.

 

Now their beds are made and they will have to sleep in them.

I fully agree the Bills are not going to be a complete or effective team until they address their needs at QB, pass rushing OLB, and OL. For OL, LT is the biggest need, but the Bills also need a RT and a center. They could always move Wood to C, in which case they'd need a RG instead.

 

As for free agency, there weren't exactly a lot of first-rate players at any of the Bills' major needs. One could always argue that (insert the name of some second- or third-rate player) is better than what we have right now. But the Bills should be focused on finding long-term answers, rather than on attempting to find free agent stopgaps like the ones Marv found.

 

In the draft, Spiller was significantly more highly rated than were any of the other players available when the Bills picked. I'm not any happier about addressing the RB position than you are. On the other hand, this team needs superstars and game changers, in the worst way. We had to get a player like that with our first round pick, if this team is going to go anywhere. Taking a very highly rated player--such as Spiller--seems more likely to produce that outcome than taking would reaching for a lesser player based on need. (Reaching for players based on perceived need brought us Whitner, McCargo, and others.)

 

I realize you probably want the Bills to engage in a drafting strategy that's somewhere between those two extremes. To draft players at positions that are of more need than RB, without engaging in Whitner-style reaches. And that's fair enough. But if Spiller becomes the next Thurman Thomas, and if the LTs and QBs picked 9th - 20th tend to be a little disappointing for where they were drafted, Nix's decision will look like a good one.

 

Like you, I was disappointed when the Bills used their second round pick on Troupe instead of Clausen. But it looks like Troupe is off to a good start for his career. If these early indicators are correct, Troupe will more than justify the second round pick used to take him. As for Clausen--the decision to pass him over will be justified in hindsight if one of the following happens: 1) Clausen has a bad career. 2) The Bills find a QB that's as good or better, in the 2011 draft. 3) One of the current Bills' QBs turns out to be The Guy. The odds of 3) are very slim, so let's focus on 1) and 2). There will be some good QBs available in 2011--guys like Ponder--so hopefully the Bills will draft one of them.

 

In 2010, the Bills seemed to do a good job of finding players that are as good as, or better, than you'd expect from their draft position. If the Bills manage to continue that in the 2011 draft, and if they address QB and LT very early on, it would represent very solid progress towards building a good team! :lol: (And yes, I realize that's a lot of ifs.)

Posted
I fully agree the Bills are not going to be a complete or effective team until they address their needs at QB, pass rushing OLB, and OL.

 

Why? Just throw the ball up to Evans. TOUCHDOWN! Every time.

 

Just ask the Evans fanboys.

Posted
Au contrare mon frere. You can B word and moan all you want, but the Bills are what they are. They are where they are. 10 years later, THIS IS WHAT WE GOT!! This is year one of this regime. They have had less than a year to assemble this team. That being said, if next year looks like last year, rest assured my season tix count will go down. I don't make excuses for anyone. But if you think that fans have anything to do with the direction of the team, you are delusional.

 

Likewise, if you think they could have secured a QB, LT, RT, 2 WRs, a TE, a Defensive line and at least 2 starting LBs in 1 year, back off the hooka.

No, the problem is, a real organization would know that they suck and would have started addressing the problem now, in order to prepare for the future.

 

How'd they do that, and start addressing the above problems you point out? Well, they drafted C.J. Spiller of course. Please note my sarcasm as I say that. So, again, they addressed a QB, LT, RT, 2 WR's, a TE, and a D-Line and 2 LB's with CJ Spiller, old ass Cornell Brown, and a couple of medicore or backup LB's from other teams, who are barely good enough to replace the guys that supposedly don't fit this new system.

 

I don't know why so many of you can't just call this organization for what it is. It's a joke. Period. Doesn't mean we don't like them, but they are the new joke of the league.

Posted
Ugh is right! i see Peyton Manning rushing his throws and he still manages to complete them while taking a hit. Let's scrutinize Aaron Rodgers, Roethlisberger, RIvers, Eli, etc... These guys are scrambling for their lives and still make plays! NO TEAM has a flawless O-line. QB's still have to make plays. I'm not saying the O-line doesn't need to get better but the QB's here give them no help whatsoever.

 

 

Tom Brady looked completely out of sorts against the Ravens in the face of their blitz in the playoffs, Rodgers went 6-10 in 2008 with that abysmal line and Manning has struggled time and time again when the line starts braking down, Eli has played horribly when the Giants couldn't establish the run.

 

An average QB can look great behind a great line and a great QB can look average behind a bad line, but an Average QB behind a bad line has no chance.

 

 

 

If your point is; Bills need to get a pro bowl QB, nobody will object. There aren't a lot of unemployed probowl QB’s around looking for work though...

Posted
Ugh is right! i see Peyton Manning rushing his throws and he still manages to complete them while taking a hit. Let's scrutinize Aaron Rodgers, Roethlisberger, RIvers, Eli, etc... These guys are scrambling for their lives and still make plays! NO TEAM has a flawless O-line. QB's still have to make plays. I'm not saying the O-line doesn't need to get better but the QB's here give them no help whatsoever.

It might just be that those elite QB's actually have more then one decent receiver to throw to, and have a decent offensive scheme to play in.

 

Your right tho, in that no team has a perfect O line, but Tom Brady and Payton Manning are among the least sacked QB's in the NFL, and when they do get under great pressure they tend to play like...Trent Edwards

 

Brady and the Pats went undefeated 16-0 until they get overwhelmed by that NYG pass rush in the SB, Manning getting blitzed by Greg Williams defense in the SB

 

The Bills had absolutely the worst O line in the NFL by far last season, and sadly Nix / Gailey basically ignored that unit and the entire team will suffer this year for it!

Posted
No, the problem is, a real organization would know that they suck and would have started addressing the problem now, in order to prepare for the future.

 

How'd they do that, and start addressing the above problems you point out? Well, they drafted C.J. Spiller of course. Please note my sarcasm as I say that. So, again, they addressed a QB, LT, RT, 2 WR's, a TE, and a D-Line and 2 LB's with CJ Spiller, old ass Cornell Brown, and a couple of medicore or backup LB's from other teams, who are barely good enough to replace the guys that supposedly don't fit this new system.

 

I don't know why so many of you can't just call this organization for what it is. It's a joke. Period. Doesn't mean we don't like them, but they are the new joke of the league.

I didn't say they were anything but a joke. But so what.

Posted
Ugh, This team has become such a joke. It's utterly ridiculous to root for this team, when they hire 70 year old GMs and retreads as a HC no one wants. This is gonna be an ugly season. They got no OL or QB. 0-16 might very well happen.

 

 

LOL dude....why are you here then? Go route for the Saints or some other "good" team. Damn fair weather fans....

Posted
No, the problem is, a real organization would know that they suck and would have started addressing the problem now, in order to prepare for the future.

 

How'd they do that, and start addressing the above problems you point out? Well, they drafted C.J. Spiller of course. Please note my sarcasm as I say that. So, again, they addressed a QB, LT, RT, 2 WR's, a TE, and a D-Line and 2 LB's with CJ Spiller, old ass Cornell Brown, and a couple of medicore or backup LB's from other teams, who are barely good enough to replace the guys that supposedly don't fit this new system.

 

I don't know why so many of you can't just call this organization for what it is. It's a joke. Period. Doesn't mean we don't like them, but they are the new joke of the league.

I never said the 2010 were anything but a joke. But so were the 1985 Bills. The question is: Are they moving forward? At this point, who knows.....

Posted
I was just waiting for this excuse. I knew it was coming and now that he said it confirms my belief that Nix seriously screwed up this offseason by not addressing the O-Line. Gailey says in an article from Chris Brown yesterday that: a QB can't throw downfield while he's scrambling for his life or lying on his back, we got to protect better (paraphrasing).

They are already using the poor oline as an excuse for Trent's failure to throw past 4 yards. I know we played w/o some starters on the oline Friday night but doubt Cornhole Green would do much better. The fact that Nix did nothing to shore up our oline this past offseason will kill this team, something I've been saying since the draft ended . The Bills have alot of money to spend, no cap, no Schobel, small payroll; would it kill them to bring in a Flozell-Jamal Brown-Marcus Mcneil etc.

Damit Ralph spend some money and get us some NFL tackles! Nix get out of bed before noon, put down the Metamucil, pick up the rotary dial phone and do something-Oh Yeah it's too late for this year so go back to bed.

Reaching for a need is a sure way to have a good team :lol:

Posted
LOL dude....why are you here then? Go route for the Saints or some other "good" team. Damn fair weather fans....

+1, and then some.

Posted
Whoa Sally, are you ovulating? Have some ginsing tea, a good cry and things will get better.

 

 

Hmmm....why do you think a woman experiencing menses is a good metaphor for a weak person needlessly fretting to the point of tears?

 

I don't know about the women in your life but the women I know would kick me in the nads If I

came up with that one. I am sure it was unintended so don't take my pointing it out personally.

I do think the time has past though for using statements like "acting like a girl" as an insult

meant to characterize a man as being weak.

Posted
Au contrare mon frere. You can B word and moan all you want, but the Bills are what they are. They are where they are. 10 years later, THIS IS WHAT WE GOT!! This is year one of this regime. They have had less than a year to assemble this team. That being said, if next year looks like last year, rest assured my season tix count will go down. I don't make excuses for anyone. But if you think that fans have anything to do with the direction of the team, you are delusional.

 

Likewise, if you think they could have secured a QB, LT, RT, 2 WRs, a TE, a Defensive line and at least 2 starting LBs in 1 year, back off the hooka.

 

I also think they shoulda cured cancer too. And baldness. They had one whole offseason to do it. It's time for them to go. Clearly they are failures and the team needs to go in another direction. 7 months and not one word from them on how they are doing with that flying car thing. F'ing losers.

Posted
Reaching for a need is a sure way to have a good team :lol:

 

Of course it is. If you have sub par players and slightly less sub par player is available then you take him! That way you can still be sub par!

 

Oh wait..I seem to have a flaw in my log....NEVERMIND THAT! You're getting off topic. Ralph is cheap!

Posted
I also think they shoulda cured cancer too. And baldness. They had one whole offseason to do it. It's time for them to go. Clearly they are failures and the team needs to go in another direction. 7 months and not one word from them on how they are doing with that flying car thing. F'ing losers.

Harrump!

Posted
While I expect the OL to be a problem for the Bills this year, it should be mentioned THREE starting linemen were out for the last game.

 

Just sayin'...

 

And after the first series, TWO starting running backs (in what is reportedly supposed to be a run first scheme). Nothing like a Varsity-JV scrimmage.

Posted

I would like to see the three linemen who are penciled in as opening day starters in the line-up before I pass any judgments. Not that they are going to be any better at all than the back-ups (they probably won't), but then again, there is the outside chance that they are at least a little bit better.

 

I would at least like to watch these guys play this year before I am up in arms about a quote that Chan Gailey probably didn't say about a bunch of guys who haven't seen the field yet.

×
×
  • Create New...