/dev/null Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b195430_ne...=rss_topstories Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 May be the "straw" breaking my procrastination around upgrading to blu-ray. Pretty cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 May be the "straw" breaking my procrastination around upgrading to blu-ray. Pretty cool. I won't buy anything until they remove Hayden Christensen from the ending of Jedi and restore the original celebration music at the end. It actually bridges into the closing theme unlike what they've switched to now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metal Man Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 I won't buy anything until they remove Hayden Christensen from the ending of Jedi and restore the original celebration music at the end. It actually bridges into the closing theme unlike what they've switched to now. +1 The changed ending to Jedi is terrible. Adding something I could have lived with but completely changing ruined the whole thing for me, even if the ewok song was kind of corny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 +1 The changed ending to Jedi is terrible. Adding something I could have lived with but completely changing ruined the whole thing for me, even if the ewok song was kind of corny. Definitely corny, but at least it fit the mood. What they have in there now is completely generic and sticks out like a sore thumb. I'm guessing John Williams had absolutely nothing to do with it. And yes, I realize there were other changes in the 3 movies that aren't so welcomed by most fans. I just happened to watch Jedi on Spike TV yesterday so it's fresh in my memory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 And yes, I realize there were other changes in the 3 movies that aren't so welcomed by most fans. I just happened to watch Jedi on Spike TV yesterday so it's fresh in my memory. Han shot first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 Han shot first. Lucas is a damned hydrocephalic moron to not know how much that single change eviscerated the movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stl Bills Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 NERDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 Han shot first. I was wondering how long that would take Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 NERDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! My objection to Han shooting first is less about being a Star Wars fan and more about being a bit of a film buff. Lucas, with that one change, demonstrated he knew jack **** about character and plot development. Still nerdy...but a different type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 My objection to Han shooting first is less about being a Star Wars fan and more about being a bit of a film buff. Lucas, with that one change, demonstrated he knew jack **** about character and plot development. Still nerdy...but a different type. Now you've got me thinknig of the Burton Batman movie where they made the Joker the murderer of Bruce Wayne's parents. His motivation for being Batman was completely shot after the ending of that movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linksfiend Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b195430_ne...=rss_topstories Leaked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 My objection to Han shooting first is less about being a Star Wars fan and more about being a bit of a film buff. Lucas, with that one change, demonstrated he knew jack **** about character and plot development. Still nerdy...but a different type. Thank you. That single change screwed with the entire movie. That and adding a !@#$ing beak on the Sarlaac. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 My objection to Han shooting first is less about being a Star Wars fan and more about being a bit of a film buff. Lucas, with that one change, demonstrated he knew jack **** about character and plot development. Lucas knew about character and plot development...a long time ago... Seriously though, that's why the original trilogy was so great. You cared about the characters AND the story. Now it wasn't Shakespeare (sorry, Alec Guinness), but who talks like that anyway? The latest trilogy didn't make me feel for the characters or the storyline. But whether the change was a function of Lucas losing the ability he showed in the first trilogy, or wanting to sanctify the now iconic (versus then when he was a nobody) Solo by making his actions self-defense and not murder, is open for debate. I'd say it's more of the latter. But still, he shouldn't have changed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 Lucas knew about character and plot development...a long time ago... Seriously though, that's why the original trilogy was so great. You cared about the characters AND the story. Now it wasn't Shakespeare (sorry, Alec Guinness), but who talks like that anyway? The latest trilogy didn't make me feel for the characters or the storyline. But whether the change was a function of Lucas losing the ability he showed in the first trilogy, or wanting to sanctify the now iconic (versus then when he was a nobody) Solo by making his actions self-defense and not murder, is open for debate. I'd say it's more of the latter. But still, he shouldn't have changed it. I'd say it was more of the latter to...but either way, Lucas fundamentally misses the point that Solo's entire development through the film is about his redemption and him coming to believe in something bigger than himself, which is a story arc that is completely gutted with the change to Han not shooting first. What's more, that entire arc plays off Luke's wide-eyed idealistic innocence as a "farm boy in the big world"...so not only does that change gut Han's story, it greivously wounds Luke's story as well. Basically, with that one change, the movie becomes nothing more than a story about a beeping trash can on wheels and his effete, blinged-out sidekick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Jack Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 Basically, with that one change, the movie becomes nothing more than a story about a beeping trash can on wheels and his effete, blinged-out sidekick. I was thinking about that the other day when I caught part of Return Of The Jedi on TV. Here's a band of rebels, in camouflage sneaking through the woods of Endor, and who is with them? A 6 foot tall shiny gold robot and another short blinding white one. I'm sure they won't stand out among all the green and brown trees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 I'd say it was more of the latter to...but either way, Lucas fundamentally misses the point that Solo's entire development through the film is about his redemption and him coming to believe in something bigger than himself, which is a story arc that is completely gutted with the change to Han not shooting first. What's more, that entire arc plays off Luke's wide-eyed idealistic innocence as a "farm boy in the big world"...so not only does that change gut Han's story, it greivously wounds Luke's story as well. Basically, with that one change, the movie becomes nothing more than a story about a beeping trash can on wheels and his effete, blinged-out sidekick. I disagree slightly. Yes, it is a huge change and I cursed Lucas for it. Han can still be fairly grey without shooting first though. Curious to your take on how that significantly impacts Luke's character. He still retains the wide eyed innocence. I was thinking about that the other day when I caught part of Return Of The Jedi on TV. Here's a band of rebels, in camouflage sneaking through the woods of Endor, and who is with them? A 6 foot tall shiny gold robot and another short blinding white one. I'm sure they won't stand out among all the green and brown trees. I take R2 no matter what (probably best to at least spray can paint him green) as he is far too useful. Threepio...not so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted August 18, 2010 Author Share Posted August 18, 2010 I was thinking about that the other day when I caught part of Return Of The Jedi on TV. Here's a band of rebels, in camouflage sneaking through the woods of Endor, and who is with them? A 6 foot tall shiny gold robot and another short blinding white one. I'm sure they won't stand out among all the green and brown trees. And then there's the whole Chewbacca thing That does not make sense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 And then there's the whole Chewbacca thing That does not make sense! Living on Endor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 I'd say it was more of the latter to...but either way, Lucas fundamentally misses the point that Solo's entire development through the film is about his redemption and him coming to believe in something bigger than himself, which is a story arc that is completely gutted with the change to Han not shooting first. What's more, that entire arc plays off Luke's wide-eyed idealistic innocence as a "farm boy in the big world"...so not only does that change gut Han's story, it greivously wounds Luke's story as well. Basically, with that one change, the movie becomes nothing more than a story about a beeping trash can on wheels and his effete, blinged-out sidekick. IMHO, Han shooting first or not makes little difference in terms of his development. To me, Greedo's intentions were clear: he meant to kill Han and bring his carcass back to Jabba, so Han shooting first was about self-defense, not cold-blooded murder. Changing the scene to have Greedo shoot first and leave no doubt that it was self defense by Han was likely Lucas' objective. But the original scene is not dissimilar to Obi Wan killing that criminal bothering Luke at the bar, sensing Luke's life was in danger. To me, the change (besides looking fake and really, just dumb) made Han look like he didn't know what was coming, and that's not his character. As for redemption, Han redeems himself from thinking only about himself and money (and not being a cold-blooded killer), to putting himself at risk when he returns as Luke's wingman at the end of A New Hope, as well as during the rest of the trilogy. I still don't think he fully embraced the Force, but just learned to accept it, and if faced with the Greedo situation again, would have greased him first, again. But the story was always supposed to be about one thing: love. A boy's love for his father and sister, a man's love for a woman, friends' love for each other, and most of all, a father's love for his son, for which he'd risk his life, and in the process mortally wound himself. IOW, Han's redemption couldn't carry Vader's' redemption's jock strap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts