NewHampshireBillsFan Posted August 16, 2010 Posted August 16, 2010 Please don't depress me with comparisons to 1985 and 1968. I'm starting to get more nervous about this season anyway. Unfortunately most of the Bills past is better left in the past and not revisited by comparisons to today.
benderbender Posted August 16, 2010 Posted August 16, 2010 Its easy to subscribe to conspiracy theories when the front office doesn't address obvious needs. We needed a LT last year, did we draft high or trade for one? We needed a QB this year, did we draft high or trade for one?
coldstorage5 Posted August 16, 2010 Posted August 16, 2010 Buffalo needs to completely bottom out in 2010. They've avoided it since 2001, and amid so many changes since the TD years, nothing has worked. Cheap HC and GM hires, poor drafting, bad FA acquisitions, band aids all over, they simply need to go 1-15, 2-14, or 3-13 and get a high pick. Otherwise, the team can say things aren't bad like they have these past few seasons. 3-13 was a deep enough hole??? come on man
Marv's Neighbor Posted August 16, 2010 Posted August 16, 2010 How are you going to generate 1.21 Gigawatts to send us back to 1985? Build a Stadium at the Falls and plug into good ole cheap, reliable hydro power.
crazyDingo Posted August 16, 2010 Posted August 16, 2010 How are you going to generate 1.21 Gigawatts to send us back to 1985? Wait a minute, Marty... If Trent was Ferragamo and was pulled last season in place of Fitz/Matheson, then this season SHOULD HAVE been the drafting of our next star QB! Great Scott! The crappiness of this team has distorted the space-time continuum!
indiragandhi'sthong Posted August 16, 2010 Posted August 16, 2010 1985 was Bruce Mathison - and I agree it does look like 1985. 1984 was Ferragamo.
HARCO186 Posted August 16, 2010 Posted August 16, 2010 What is the deal with you people in Buffalo?????? I can't believe all the negatives that run around up there. The Bills by the way had caparable numbers with the skins for the first quarter. I know we had our first unit in there, but not the line and from the start we held our own. The Bills are much better and wll be. I'm starting to question the fans on this board more than the team with all the negatives. Other people besides Bill fans read this stuff and feed off it. Go to some other posts and see how many fans diss their teams like Bill fans. Not many at all. BILLIEVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 16, 2010 Posted August 16, 2010 What is the deal with you people in Buffalo?????? I can't believe all the negatives that run around up there. The Bills by the way had caparable numbers with the skins for the first quarter. I know we had our first unit in there, but not the line and from the start we held our own. The Bills are much better and wll be. I'm starting to question the fans on this board more than the team with all the negatives. Other people besides Bill fans read this stuff and feed off it. Go to some other posts and see how many fans diss their teams like Bill fans. Not many at all. BILLIEVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Back away from the crystal meth.
Albany,n.y. Posted August 16, 2010 Author Posted August 16, 2010 1985 was Bruce Mathison - and I agree it does look like 1985. 1984 was Ferragamo. Wrong-Ferguson & Dufek were 1984
Thurman#1 Posted August 16, 2010 Posted August 16, 2010 In 1985 Ferragamo was washed up. Trent can't be much worse than 1985 Ferragamo. Ferragamo was so bad the Bills cut him during the season. Yup, Ferragamo was stunningly bad in Buffalo. In 1985. 51.9% completions, 5 TDs and 17 INTs, a Y/A of 5.8. FIVE POINT EIGHT!! That makes Trent look like Captain Longball. And a QB rating of 50.8. I mean, that is bad!!
Thurman#1 Posted August 16, 2010 Posted August 16, 2010 Back away from the crystal meth. It sounded a bit more like a downers and ecstasy combo. To make him relaxed and happy.
HARCO186 Posted August 16, 2010 Posted August 16, 2010 Look at some other threads. People are saying get rid of Trent because he's a nice guy but sucks...... More negatives than anything.
Recommended Posts