blzrul Posted August 4, 2010 Posted August 4, 2010 3rdnlng said: I guess a person would have to get a copy of "The Naked Communist" and judge for themself if the book that is quoted in the Congressional Record has any validity. I still see no reason to shoot the messenger. You must be new here then, because everyone gets shot, all the time, no matter whether they're the messenger or even the Creator. There is no other reason to be here.
DC Tom Posted August 4, 2010 Posted August 4, 2010 blzrul said: You must be new here then, because everyone gets shot, all the time, no matter whether they're the messenger or even the Creator. There is no other reason to be here. Case in point: !@#$ off, evil B word snake woman. Long time no see...
LeviF Posted August 4, 2010 Posted August 4, 2010 DC Tom said: Case in point: !@#$ off, evil B word snake woman. Long time no see... She hangs around. I see her post in the Shout! box once in a while.
3rdnlng Posted August 4, 2010 Posted August 4, 2010 blzrul said: You must be new here then, because everyone gets shot, all the time, no matter whether they're the messenger or even the Creator. There is no other reason to be here. New, no. I was just giving fair warning---I shoot back.
Booster4324 Posted August 5, 2010 Posted August 5, 2010 3rdnlng said: New, no. I was just giving fair warning---I shoot back. This distinguishes you in what way?
drnykterstein Posted August 5, 2010 Posted August 5, 2010 Associating progressives to communists. Ok, whatever you conservative communist fascist want to think is fine with me.
DC Tom Posted August 5, 2010 Posted August 5, 2010 conner said: Associating progressives to communists. Ok, whatever you conservative communist fascist want to think is fine with me. What???
....lybob Posted August 5, 2010 Posted August 5, 2010 conner said: Associating progressives to communists. Ok, whatever you conservative communist fascist want to think is fine with me. DC Tom said: What??? yeah I was thrown off too - you would associate with or equate to- and while communism and fascism are some of the many branches of socialism I wouldn't use them together to describe someone, Neocon fascist would be a better choice.
DC Tom Posted August 5, 2010 Posted August 5, 2010 ....lybob said: yeah I was thrown off too - you would associate with or equate to- and while communism and fascism are some of the many branches of socialism I wouldn't use them together to describe someone, Neocon fascist would be a better choice. That's not the only problem I had. The whole post didn't make a lick of sense. But he did give us all his personal approval to equate progressives and commies. So we got that goin' for us, which is nice...
Taro T Posted August 5, 2010 Posted August 5, 2010 DC Tom said: That's not the only problem I had. The whole post didn't make a lick of sense. But he did give us all his personal approval to equate progressives and commies. So we got that goin' for us, which is nice... But he only gave the approval to the communist fascists, so I think he still has an out.
drnykterstein Posted August 5, 2010 Posted August 5, 2010 DC Tom said: That's not the only problem I had. The whole post didn't make a lick of sense. Neither did the link in the first post of this thread. I'm just playing whatever game the authors of that thing (and RH) are playing.
DC Tom Posted August 5, 2010 Posted August 5, 2010 conner said: Neither did the link in the first post of this thread. I'm just playing whatever game the authors of that thing (and RH) are playing. Ah, the old "I got called out posting something incomprehensibly stupid, so I'm going to blame it on someone else" game.
GG Posted August 5, 2010 Posted August 5, 2010 DC Tom said: Ah, the old "I got called out posting something incomprehensibly stupid, so I'm going to blame it on someone else" game. What's good for this administration is good for conner.
3rdnlng Posted August 5, 2010 Posted August 5, 2010 DC Tom said: Ah, the old "I got called out posting something incomprehensibly stupid, so I'm going to blame it on someone else" game. Bush did it.
3rdnlng Posted August 5, 2010 Posted August 5, 2010 Booster4324 said: This distinguishes you in what way? I have a big gun and am very accurate. Plus I reload very quickly.
Dan Posted August 6, 2010 Posted August 6, 2010 I read that whole thing. And,wow, I really have to admit....it was so friggin absurd it was hilarious.
Simon Posted August 6, 2010 Posted August 6, 2010 3rdnlng said: I have a big gun and am very accurate. Plus I reload very quickly. If you need to reload, you ain't that accurate.
DC Tom Posted August 6, 2010 Posted August 6, 2010 Simon said: If you need to reload, you ain't that accurate. Might be a flintlock rifle.
3rdnlng Posted August 6, 2010 Posted August 6, 2010 Simon said: If you need to reload, you ain't that accurate. I guess that just went over your head.
Simon Posted August 6, 2010 Posted August 6, 2010 3rdnlng said: I guess that just went over your head. That's because you're not very accurate.
Recommended Posts