Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 I disagree with Ben Stein on this point; many do not want Boomers, even if they are twice as qualified as a younger person. Becau$e they are expen$ive. Expensive health costs. Expensive salary requirements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 I worked about 27 years with the same company (with different owners). I started funding my retirement 25 years ago. In the last 5 years or more before layoff, if I got a raise, it ALL went into my 401K. As owners changed, pensions and 401Ks were NOT kept with the company that cut me. I survived in a department of over 80 down to the final 12, but did not make the cut to the last 5 people. I worked 20 months on contract and was cut again. Then I worked another job almost a year part-time, even though I was offered unemployment. I want to freaking work. I have not taken money from savings (except once for property taxes) and have not touched IRAs or 401Ks. I have not had NEW money to add to the retirement accounts since 2007. I am a 57 year old who may end up taking a job at half or less of what I made. I can live with that but I am not finished! I am looking for a new career to occupy at least my next two decades. After that I am not sure what I will do, but it will be an adventure. I would like to travel a lot. There is so much to see. I disagree with Ben Stein on this point; many do not want Boomers, even if they are twice as qualified as a younger person. "Productive workers with real skills and real ability to get along are also sometimes unemployed, but they will be the last fired and the first hired." Be flexible and reject paradigm thinking, all you Gen X, Y, Z'ers, your day will come. On the other hand, I'm a gubmint IT consultant. "Oh my God...you were in the same place for seven years?" Got a salary at the high end of the range, just for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 I worked about 27 years with the same company (with different owners). I started funding my retirement 25 years ago. In the last 5 years or more before layoff, if I got a raise, it ALL went into my 401K. As owners changed, pensions and 401Ks were NOT kept with the company that cut me. I survived in a department of over 80 down to the final 12, but did not make the cut to the last 5 people. I worked 20 months on contract and was cut again. Then I worked another job almost a year part-time, even though I was offered unemployment. I want to freaking work. I have not taken money from savings (except once for property taxes) and have not touched IRAs or 401Ks. I have not had NEW money to add to the retirement accounts since 2007. I am a 57 year old who may end up taking a job at half or less of what I made. I can live with that but I am not finished! I am looking for a new career to occupy at least my next two decades. After that I am not sure what I will do, but it will be an adventure. I would like to travel a lot. There is so much to see. I disagree with Ben Stein on this point; many do not want Boomers, even if they are twice as qualified as a younger person. "Productive workers with real skills and real ability to get along are also sometimes unemployed, but they will be the last fired and the first hired." Be flexible and reject paradigm thinking, all you Gen X, Y, Z'ers, your day will come. That's no the end of the story. Wait until they FINALLY get to Social Security. The fact that they've ignored it because the Dummycrats keep saying "there's no problem" will inevitably lead to both a benefit reduction AND an increase in the eligibility age. If you think it's tough to find a good job now, wait until you're 65 and there's literally no hiring climate because the required paradigm shift will take decades to trickle through. It likely won't effect you but my generation is going to get a nice kick in the nuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 That's no the end of the story. Wait until they FINALLY get to Social Security. The fact that they've ignored it because the Dummycrats keep saying "there's no problem" will inevitably lead to both a benefit reduction AND an increase in the eligibility age. If you think it's tough to find a good job now, wait until you're 65 and there's literally no hiring climate because the required paradigm shift will take decades to trickle through. It likely won't effect you but my generation is going to get a nice kick in the nuts. You're all lollipops and sunshine, aren't you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 You're all lollipops and sunshine, aren't you... I don't know how anyone can be. Politicians have had us on a road to ruin for decades and the populous is more concerned about frivolous arguments than facing reality. Oh, and I'm still waiting for Steely to point out some of my glaring mistakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 You're all lollipops and sunshine, aren't you... He moonlights writing greeting cards... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 He moonlights writing greeting cards... Some of his best work is here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whateverdude Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 Ok, I saw "Paradigm thinking" and "Paradigm shift" now can I get a "Paradigm Paralysis"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 This is AD's best work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 I worked about 27 years with the same company (with different owners). I started funding my Be flexible and reject paradigm thinking, all you Gen X, Y, Z'ers, your day will come. Or will it Rock? I totally agree on the flexibility and reject the paradigm thinking. Graph Notice that sharp decline in births... Me, 1968. Maybe jobs will be plentiful and catch up with the tech. I know where I work, workers are going to be going in droves during the coming years... Which is a good thing because it is the gov't and the Corps (USACE)! Amazingly they (agency) are preparing... Let the exodus take place! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 Becau$e they are expen$ive. Expensive health costs. Expensive salary requirements. Let alone labor costs... Especially in the trades. You wouldn't believe the accidents that are now happening at work! Younger guys like me (42... ) gotta pick up the slack when it comes to a lot of ****... Send the guy that is 20 years older than me out in this heat, and they may drop. The work has to get done, so we do the bulk while the older guys get the easy work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 I don't know how anyone can be. Politicians have had us on a road to ruin for decades and the populous is more concerned about frivolous arguments than facing reality. Yeah, part of me wishes I never started paying attention. It definitely adds a little bit of stress as I head toward 50 while watching my 5-year-old and wondering how bad it'll be for him. But hey...it's just stress. Nothing a big wad of cash in my pocket won't fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 Yeah, part of me wishes I never started paying attention. It definitely adds a little bit of stress as I head toward 50 while watching my 5-year-old and wondering how bad it'll be for him. But hey...it's just stress. Nothing a big wad of cash in my pocket won't fix. Jr. will appreciate that wad of cash no doubt! Anyway... Why the heck you worried?... You aren't going to live the childs life or make them do what YOU want them too... Just guide/steer them in the right direction... They are the one's that will have to take the rudder. My God, worry about that big wad of cash... Not the child or whatever half-glass empty scenario you have played out in your mind. Give them the proper tools, teach them right... And things won't be a problem. "How bad it'll be for him" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockpile Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 I disagree with Ben Stein on this point; many do not want Boomers, even if they are twice as qualified as a younger person. "Productive workers with real skills and real ability to get along are also sometimes unemployed, but they will be the last fired and the first hired." Becau$e they are expen$ive. Expensive health costs. Expensive salary requirements. We are in agreement. Employers do not want Boomers unless they fill a special niche. Stein was saying skilled, productive, team players will be the last fired and first rehired. NOT TRUE! Since 2007, each job has paid less, but I did not B word because it was WORK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockpile Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 Or will it Rock? I totally agree on the flexibility and reject the paradigm thinking. Graph Notice that sharp decline in births... Me, 1968. Maybe jobs will be plentiful and catch up with the tech. I know where I work, workers are going to be going in droves during the coming years... Which is a good thing because it is the gov't and the Corps (USACE)! Amazingly they (agency) are preparing... Let the exodus take place! You are not allowing for the potential waves of legal aliens who may need government assistance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 You are not allowing for the potential waves of legal aliens who may need government assistance. I prefer the old way: "Waves of legal aliens that work, raise a family, and pay taxes." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockpile Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 I prefer the old way: "Waves of legal aliens that work, raise a family, and pay taxes." Ah, the good old days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 But hey...it's just stress. Nothing a big wad of cash in my pocket won't fix. Until the end game of all this bad policy makes the big wad of cash essentially worthless... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 So they've extended unemployment benefits again? Great, that is not going to help things at all. I interview pretty much every week and I see anywhere between 10-20 people each week. Our corp HR department screens people and they contact close to 200 every week for me. I have actually heard (and so have our other offices as well as our HR) people say "if you can't offer me as much as I'm making on unemployment I'm not interested." Most of our compensation comes from commissions and fees we charge our clients and we do have a six month salary program that is a bit less than unemployment but also include commissions. This is a career where if you work hard and follow the process you can make great money but these lazy mother effers are driving me crazy. If they had and immediate need for money we'd have to beat them away with a stick. Just like we had to during the last recession when unemployment didn't last two years. Good job motherment. What I've told my HR is that if they say they're rather sit on their ass for unemployment than bust their ass to start a long term career, I don't want them anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 So they've extended unemployment benefits again? Great, that is not going to help things at all. I interview pretty much every week and I see anywhere between 10-20 people each week. Our corp HR department screens people and they contact close to 200 every week for me. I have actually heard (and so have our other offices as well as our HR) people say "if you can't offer me as much as I'm making on unemployment I'm not interested." Most of our compensation comes from commissions and fees we charge our clients and we do have a six month salary program that is a bit less than unemployment but also include commissions. This is a career where if you work hard and follow the process you can make great money but these lazy mother effers are driving me crazy. If they had and immediate need for money we'd have to beat them away with a stick. Just like we had to during the last recession when unemployment didn't last two years. Good job motherment. What I've told my HR is that if they say they're rather sit on their ass for unemployment than bust their ass to start a long term career, I don't want them anyway. Why do you think disability enforcement is so tight? If people can get paid more not to work than to work, they're not going to work. Me, I'd like a salary and a commission. Salary helps round out the lows, commission helps you make your own raise. Best of both worlds! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts