Malazan Posted July 13, 2010 Posted July 13, 2010 there's a difference between interested and willing to give up a pick for him.
Skoobydum Posted July 13, 2010 Posted July 13, 2010 They're interested in not giving up a pick for him.
Beerball Posted July 13, 2010 Author Posted July 13, 2010 They're interested in not giving up a pick for him. That would be my guess.
C.Biscuit97 Posted July 13, 2010 Posted July 13, 2010 He'd be an interesting fullback (would be nice to have one who actual could do other things) prospect and short yardage back. He's a beast.
Hossage Posted July 13, 2010 Posted July 13, 2010 I wasn't blown away by Unga. I dont think I would give up anything for him either. The hand held 4.6 40 time surprised me, he seemed slower. I agree with C. Biscuit, it would be nice to have a versatile fullback.
devldog131 Posted July 14, 2010 Posted July 14, 2010 I can't take seriously the opinion of a "writer" who uses the phrase "more quieter."
Skoobydum Posted July 14, 2010 Posted July 14, 2010 I can't take seriously the opinion of a "writer" who uses the phrase "more quieter." There is a place for that, my date screamed more quieter than the one last night. It sets a precedent for calling the louder screamer back again, setting a precedent is the key thing. More quieter = a precedent to be set. Get it??
devldog131 Posted July 14, 2010 Posted July 14, 2010 There is a place for that, my date screamed more quieter than the one last night. It sets a precedent for calling the louder screamer back again, setting a precedent is the key thing. More quieter = a precedent to be set. Get it?? Such explanation/justification should not be required to interpret the work of a professional writer. And, a louder screamer isn't always a good thing. I had a girl who lived in an apartment, the neighbors thought I was assaulting her(and not in the good way) and next thing we knew, the cops were at the door... although, I was proud of myself for taking her there.
High Mark Posted July 14, 2010 Posted July 14, 2010 The kid was a tail back in college in a spread offense. Just because he is 240 doesnt mean he is a FB. Skill set is extremely different.
Hossage Posted July 14, 2010 Posted July 14, 2010 The kid was a tail back in college in a spread offense. Just because he is 240 doesnt mean he is a FB. Skill set is extremely different. Word, he is a right half in a wing T or an old school power flanker.
Recommended Posts