Nanker Posted July 9, 2010 Posted July 9, 2010 Dr. Berwick appointed head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Because Obama’s made this recess appointment while Congress was out for the July 4th holiday, the Democrat-controlled Finance Committee no longer needs to hold a confirmation hearing on Berwick before the November elections and Senate Majority Leader Reid does not need to schedule a vote on the nomination this year. It's not like this guy couldn't get confirmed with the control the Dems have in the Senate. Why not have him undergo the confirmation hearing process? I'm puzzled. More transparency?
Philly McButterpants Posted July 9, 2010 Posted July 9, 2010 A recess appointee???? Wasn't that an impeachable offense a few years back?
IDBillzFan Posted July 9, 2010 Posted July 9, 2010 Let me save the libs the trouble of typing a response: "Well, Bush did it, and where was your anger when Bush did it? Besides, governing is hard. And we can't help it if you're too stupid to grasp the vision that we smart people can see." One thing you can say about Berwick. Unlike the president, he has the coconuts say out loud what everyone knows Obama believes: Single payer is the only way, redistribution of wealth is the only answer, and rationing is undoubtedly imminent.
KD in CA Posted July 9, 2010 Posted July 9, 2010 Let me save the libs the trouble of typing a response: "Well, Bush did it, and where was your anger when Bush did it? Besides, governing is hard. And we can't help it if you're too stupid to grasp the vision that we smart people can see." You forgot: "How can Obama be expected to accomplish anything meaningful with only 59 votes in the Senate?"
3rdnlng Posted July 9, 2010 Posted July 9, 2010 You forgot: "How can Obama be expected to accomplish anything meaningful with only 59 votes in the Senate?" Because he is going to be inclusive and the first bi-partisan president.
IDBillzFan Posted July 9, 2010 Posted July 9, 2010 Because he is going to be inclusive and the first bi-partisan president. Yep. Won't be the same old Washington when Barack is in charge.
Magox Posted July 9, 2010 Posted July 9, 2010 Yep. Won't be the same old Washington when Barack is in charge. There is no doubt that the Obama Brand has been tarnished. Hope and Change? Out the Window.... Yes We Can? Looks as if he couldn't... 8 more years of Failed policies? hmmm, the last two years havn't inspired any confidence either... Bush bla bla bla??? People are tired of this, we're looking for working solutions.... A new era of politics??? Ya right, same old same old.... I mean, that was pretty much the whole 2008 campaign. Independents now approve of BO at a 38% clip, the GOP is energized as hell, as long as good ol Sarah doesn't run, I'm thinking there is a better than 50/50% chance he becomes a one term president.
3rdnlng Posted July 9, 2010 Posted July 9, 2010 There is no doubt that the Obama Brand has been tarnished. Hope and Change? Out the Window.... Yes We Can? Looks as if he couldn't... 8 more years of Failed policies? hmmm, the last two years havn't inspired any confidence either... Bush bla bla bla??? People are tired of this, we're looking for working solutions.... A new era of politics??? Ya right, same old same old.... I mean, that was pretty much the whole 2008 campaign. Independents now approve of BO at a 38% clip, the GOP is energized as hell, as long as good ol Sarah doesn't run, I'm thinking there is a better than 50/50% chance he becomes a one term president. His policies go against the mainstream and they will not work. I think that by the time he is done with his first term he will be well qualified to be on the cover of Mad Magazine and his chances will be nil.
birdog1960 Posted July 9, 2010 Posted July 9, 2010 Let me save the libs the trouble of typing a response: "Well, Bush did it, and where was your anger when Bush did it? Besides, governing is hard. And we can't help it if you're too stupid to grasp the vision that we smart people can see." One thing you can say about Berwick. Unlike the president, he has the coconuts say out loud what everyone knows Obama believes: Single payer is the only way, redistribution of wealth is the only answer, and rationing is undoubtedly imminent. a fine choice. a pediatrician with real life experience, great training, solid academic pedigree, wit, wisdom and courage.
3rdnlng Posted July 9, 2010 Posted July 9, 2010 a fine choice. a pediatrician with real life experience, great training, solid academic pedigree, wit, wisdom and courage. So, you are for single payer and rationing of healthcare? Redistribution of wealth through healthcare?
Magox Posted July 9, 2010 Posted July 9, 2010 a fine choice. a pediatrician with real life experience, great training, solid academic pedigree, wit, wisdom and courage. If you share Obama's vision, then yes, a fine choice.
birdog1960 Posted July 9, 2010 Posted July 9, 2010 So, you are for single payer and rationing of healthcare? Redistribution of wealth through healthcare? single payer-absolutely. rationing-happening every day by private insurers. i would actually appreciate more universal, evidence based utilization policies. redistribution of wealth- not sure why this has to be considered a condition of universal coverage other than for the fact that a progressive taxation scheme will be paying the bills. we already have that.
Recommended Posts