Buffalonian-at-Heart Posted July 2, 2010 Posted July 2, 2010 I totally agree! Fozell Adams main problem is false starts I can live with one or two a game. But I rather see Meredith or bell man the position rite now, if they can't handle the job then that's what the draft is for. They believe in buildin thru the draft philosophy anyway.... You can live with one or two false starts a game? To me that would be totally unacceptable.
San-O Posted July 2, 2010 Posted July 2, 2010 F. Adams wants 4 mill a year to play left tackle. Seem per reasonable given the fact there going to pay green 9 mill over 3 years. They must think that what they have is good enough at tackles, and will get better with more reps? I still think the O-line is are biggest problem and we need a starter and some depth. Thoughts? Honestly, the Bills F.O. has been SO horrible at bringing on O-line free agents.
Buffalonian-at-Heart Posted July 2, 2010 Posted July 2, 2010 Honestly, the Bills F.O. has been SO horrible at bringing on O-line free agents. You can't blame the past on the current front office.
spartacus Posted July 3, 2010 Posted July 3, 2010 I'm not convinced Bell can make it through a season completely healthy. Bell is never healthy - period. not exactly the picture of reliability - which is why expecting significant improvement is being slightly optimistic
spartacus Posted July 3, 2010 Posted July 3, 2010 You can live with one or two false starts a game? To me that would be totally unacceptable. You can live with one or two false starts a game? To me that would be totally unacceptable. that would be a good day for Bell
Buffalonian-at-Heart Posted July 3, 2010 Posted July 3, 2010 You can live with one or two false starts a game? To me that would be totally unacceptable. that would be a good day for Bell What does Bell have to do with it? One or Two false starts a game kills drives no matter who is doing it.
spartacus Posted July 3, 2010 Posted July 3, 2010 What does Bell have to do with it? One or Two false starts a game kills drives no matter who is doing it. one or two a game would be a big improvement from what we get from Bell at LT
Malazan Posted July 3, 2010 Posted July 3, 2010 one or two a game would be a big improvement from what we get from Bell at LT Hooray, this post has officially entered Candy Land! I love chutes! HATE ladders~!
Fingon Posted July 4, 2010 Posted July 4, 2010 one or two a game would be a big improvement from what we get from Bell at LT Bell isn't even the starting LT.
Buffalonian-at-Heart Posted July 4, 2010 Posted July 4, 2010 one or two a game would be a big improvement from what we get from Bell at LT I'll grant you he had 6 when he went out in week 10, but that's hardly a big improvement.
Red Posted July 4, 2010 Posted July 4, 2010 Honestly, I can't say that I have watched much of Marcus McNeil to know if he is worth it or not. IF he is an improvement over Bell and Meredith, then I say do it. But if it's more of the same, then that money can best be spent elsewhere.
San Jose Bills Fan Posted July 4, 2010 Posted July 4, 2010 Honestly, I can't say that I have watched much of Marcus McNeil to know if he is worth it or not. IF he is an improvement over Bell and Meredith, then I say do it. But if it's more of the same, then that money can best be spent elsewhere. At what cost, Red? Obviously no one would trade 4 first rounders for McNeil. But it's not enough to say, "he's an improvement, bring him in" without considering what the cost would be. He'll want a long term deal and the Chargers would want trade compensation.
Recommended Posts