WisconsinBillzFan Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 54. No, seriously. 54 people were shot over the weekend in Chicago. http://chicagoist.com/2010/06/27/grand_cro..._demand_end.php Heckuva job Obammy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 And it's Obama's fault how? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 And it's Obama's fault how? When you're black and from a big city, it's your fault when people get shot while in said city. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 Community organizing. It is hard to do that anywhere else but Chitown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 When you're black and from a big city, it's your fault when people get shot while in said city. Ouch, nice one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 When you're black and from a big city, it's your fault when people get shot while in said city. Might have helped if he had spent two seconds doing his job as their elected Representative rather then running for president immediately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 Good thing guns are illegal there. I'd hate to see the numbers if law abiding citizens had guns too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hossage Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 Obama was into funding slumlords and reverse gentrification, but i dunno how much that correlates to shooting people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 54. No, seriously. 54 people were shot over the weekend in Chicago. http://chicagoist.com/2010/06/27/grand_cro..._demand_end.php Heckuva job Obammy! Would you rather 54 people pushed out the window? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Obama was into funding slumlords and reverse gentrification, but i dunno how much that correlates to shooting people. Shouldnt you be dreaming about screwing the 16 year old D. Fanning? Get the !@#$ of this board, you !@#$ing devenient!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Shouldnt you be dreaming about screwing the 16 year old D. Fanning? Get the !@#$ of this board, you !@#$ing devenient!!!!!!! Somehow I have the feeling I am your side this time, link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Somehow I have the feeling I am your side this time, link? http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?showtopic=115138 He's also mentioned wanting to do her from behind or something. Personally, I think openly fantasizing about statutory rape should be an immediate ticket off the board, but that's just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Good thing guns are illegal there. I'd hate to see the numbers if law abiding citizens had guns too. Now that's just damn funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Oh great, and we have wasted how many trillions of dollars trying to stop this sort of thing in Iraq and we can't even stop it here?? You know, if we just got government out of the way these things wouldn't happen. Right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Oh great, and we have wasted how many trillions of dollars trying to stop this sort of thing in Iraq and we can't even stop it here?? You know, if we just got government out of the way these things wouldn't happen. Right? Yes, they have really done a bang up job at helping. Right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hossage Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 I think the three of you, Bluesky, Booster, and Sage, need to take it easy. I made one facetious comment about miss Fanning, who is a year below the age of consent, when another poster brought the subject up. Honestly, fellows, get your minds out of the gutter. I even gave you a poll to express your opinions on the subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Oh great, and we have wasted how many trillions of dollars trying to stop this sort of thing in Iraq and we can't even stop it here?? You know, if we just got government out of the way these things wouldn't happen. Right? This broad-stroke song you liberals sing these days is getting a little embarrassing. You think because people want less government in their lives that you can help America believe this is really just super conservative hidden code for "NO government in your lives," and to be honest, it's getting a little embarrassing that this is the extent to which you're able to comprehend things. It's right up there with the HuffPost headline I saw tonight: WHAT BROWN CAN DO FOR YOU Sen. Scott Brown Blocks Wall Street Reform To Ensure That Taxpayers, Not Banks, Pay The $19 Billion Cost Of The Bill I swear to you that THIS is THE 87-point headline at this liberal site. And it's completely indicative of the completely lazy mindset that liberals have to present their case. They are actually so mad that this WH is too incompetent to pass real financial regulation reform that they have convinced themselves that only their fin-reg bill will keep middle America from paying for the reform. Because, in the liberal world, that additional tax to the banks would NEVER be passed on to taxpayers/consumers. No, the banks will just reach into their special "gobs of money we roll around in every day" and pay for it from there. So when you whittle down the stupidity to this level, it's not hard to see how the liberal world believes that the call for limited government is really a call for NO government. How you guys got the WH, House and Senate is second in my list of Amazingly Amazing Things, right behind how perfectly you've managed to piss away control of all three by doing nothing but things you think America would really like if only we all weren't so damn stupid to understand them better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Might have helped if he had spent two seconds doing his job as their elected Representative rather then running for president immediately. Well, there is that. Not sure if that was the actual thrust of his post though. In fact, I have no clue what the point of his post was (although a pattern of behavior suggests one interpretation). Carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Yes, they have really done a bang up job at helping. Right? Oh, Booster, I so agree,if only these people had a tax cut,things would have been ok. Governenment must have contributed to violence because violence never existed before liberal big governement. And if only the NRA uses this gun friendly court to get submachine guns legalized, things will only get better! After all, banning a Thompson Submachinegun violates my second amendment rights, right? I have to defend myself, don't I? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Oh, Booster, I so agree,if only these people had a tax cut,things would have been ok. Governenment must have contributed to violence because violence never existed before liberal big governement. And if only the NRA uses this gun friendly court to get submachine guns legalized, things will only get better! After all, banning a Thompson Submachinegun violates my second amendment rights, right? I have to defend myself, don't I? Do me a favor, explain semi-automatic and automatic weapons. Then we can get into specific weapons from 1919. After we get all that sorted out, we can talk about reasonable restrictions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts