bbb Posted June 8, 2010 Share Posted June 8, 2010 A 41 year old cougar with a 29 year old dude on a picnic table in front of kids.........The answer to the question is yes: http://www.buffalonews.com/2010/06/07/1074...cnic-table.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFinkle Posted June 8, 2010 Share Posted June 8, 2010 .............The answer to the question is yes You'd better triple bag it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted June 8, 2010 Share Posted June 8, 2010 Can't blame ya for the repost as the original title was not real clear http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?showtopic=114390 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted June 8, 2010 Author Share Posted June 8, 2010 Can't blame ya for the repost as the original title was not real clear http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?showtopic=114390 I had no idea what that was about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted June 8, 2010 Author Share Posted June 8, 2010 You'd better triple bag it. Maybe I'm just getting old, but that is not bad for a mug shot...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 Maybe I'm just getting old, but that is not bad for a mug shot...... I think he was referring to the fact that she was the type that, while married, would have sex on a public picnic table. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted June 9, 2010 Author Share Posted June 9, 2010 I think he was referring to the fact that she was the type that, while married, would have sex on a public picnic table. Oh, yeah he said triple bag "it", not "her"........I told you I was getting old Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 Can't blame ya for the repost as the original title was not real clear http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?showtopic=114390 Sigh. People are so literal these days... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 Sigh. People are so literal these days... I'm still not sure if the mayo reference was because they were on a picnic table, or well.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 She looks like an older scuzzier Mila Kunis (That 70's Show, Family Guy, Robot Chicken). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted June 9, 2010 Author Share Posted June 9, 2010 She looks like an older scuzzier Mila Kunis (That 70's Show, Family Guy, Robot Chicken). Yeah, you're right - no wonder I voted yes....I think Mila is very hot, never moreso than in Forgetting Sarah Marshall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 It bugs me when a title isn't clear enough that someone makes another post but the way around that is to use the search engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted June 9, 2010 Author Share Posted June 9, 2010 It bugs me when a title isn't clear enough that someone makes another post but the way around that is to use the search engine. Yeah, I should have searched for the word mayo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 There's something really fishy about this story to me. The officer "knew" she was married to another man and just happened upon them in the park? I know Batavia isn't a huge town, but that is a pretty big coincidence. It seems far more likely to me that the cop was either tailing her for the husband, or friends with the husband. Yeah, I know the article says that the officer knew because they'd been to her house on several calls ... but if that's the case I don't know many cops who would charge her with adultery even knowing she was married. I know of even less who would do it if they were called to the residence for domestic disturbances ... Just seems really, really odd to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 There's something really fishy about this story to me. The officer "knew" she was married to another man and just happened upon them in the park? I know Batavia isn't a huge town, but that is a pretty big coincidence. It seems far more likely to me that the cop was either tailing her for the husband, or friends with the husband. Yeah, I know the article says that the officer knew because they'd been to her house on several calls ... but if that's the case I don't know many cops who would charge her with adultery even knowing she was married. I know of even less who would do it if they were called to the residence for domestic disturbances ... Just seems really, really odd to me. Police were called to Farrell Park in Batavia at about 5:15 p.m. Friday for a complaint about the couple. When the officer arrived, the couple still was having sex on the table, Hill said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AxelRipper Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 shouldnt it have been public indecencey? I honestly did not know you could still be charged with adultery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 I missed that part ... but it still doesn't seem right. To make such a charge is not only unnecessary, but seems to be excessive. As if there was a personal side to this story. But I'm a conspiracy theorist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dib Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 I'm thinking................"ow. splinters" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted June 9, 2010 Author Share Posted June 9, 2010 shouldnt it have been public indecencey? I honestly did not know you could still be charged with adultery both were charged with public lewdness The adultery charge on her was on top of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 both were charged with public lewdness The adultery charge on her was on top of this. That's why it smells so fishy to me (no pun intended). It's an excessive charge, an outdated charge, that smacks of the officer wanting to either make an example of this chick or excessively punish her (again, no pun intended). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts