NoSaint Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 Reggie Bush has 31 TDs in 52 NFL games. That is on par with our offensive TDs the past 52 games People dont see a 2000 yard rushing season, but i promise you there is a reason the saints are willing to pay him 8+ million this year.... what a player like this does for your offense when utilized correctly can be something the likes of which hasnt been seen in buffalo in maybe 20 years. Seeing it in person week in and week out, he is electric. As much flack as we all give him down here, every time he touches the ball you are holding your breath because it could be 7. I think he gets such a hard time because you almost expect him to be able to do it every time, because he makes it look so easy so often. Another thing you notice watching him all the time is there are plenty of times in those 25 touches between TDs that he is getting garbage double reverses, end arounds, and gimmick plays to keep the defense honest, which never get real production, but open up numerous other big plays which he never sees credit for (fakes that end up with deep passes). When given the ball moving up field in any kind of space (wheel and slant routes especially) i would bet his numbers sky rocket. He has certainly had injuries hamper him, and on a team with that many weapons, there are weeks (honestly months) where he can play nothing but decoy. After growing up watching buffalo football (post superbowl) and now seeing him.... its just a whole different type of player to evaluate.
PDaDdy Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 But ya see, the same thing was probably said about Roscoe Parrish, wouldn't you agree? And, you could also throw in the special teams factor ala Spiller. What scares me (and I think a fair amount of others) is NOT Spiller himself, or even Spiller going at #9. It is the Bills using their best resources primarily on small, and in the case perhaps a part time skill player. Hopefully this will end, and the Bills can resume winning football games. Roscoe Parrish and Bush/Spiller shouldn't even be mentioned in the same paragraph much less in the same sentence like I just did. I am trying to entertain this as a serious question but when you start throwing in Roscoe Parrish you are reaching to unsuccessfully try to make a point. Chris Johnson and Reggie Bush are more the options for what Spiller could become and will be used for. They are all built the same. But Spiller is a better WR like Bush and he has sub 4.3 speed like Chris Johnson.
PDaDdy Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 If he can stay healthier than Reggie Bush, I would take RB's rookie numbers all day long: 565 rushing yds., 88 recpections for 742 yds...9 total Tds (1 punt return). As I said in the first page of this thread. We should be so lucky!!!
stuckincincy Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 Come on Cincy. The PAc 10 is one of the most overrated conferences in America. The only teams that are consistently good have been USC and Oregon. At the very least, teh ACC and the Pac 10 are equal and a lot of people probably would give the edge to the ACC. I merely posed a simple question, with an observation. I don't know why it is to be thought that I have an axe or agenda to grind...
Steve0022 Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 The problem with Reggie Bush is that he doesn't understand how to carry the ball in the NFL. Often he tries to make the big play instead of taking the yards that are available. Before he came out I was watching a USC game with some friends and the announcers were talking about Bush possibly being the number one pick. I thought it was odd that they would say that considering Bush wasn't even the best back on his own team. Lendale White took the bulk of the carries between the tackles and the hard short yards. However, if you watch C.J. Spiller, he understands how to carry the ball between the tackles and get what is available. That's why he'll have more success in the NFL as running back.
stuckincincy Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 The problem with Reggie Bush is that he doesn't understand how to carry the ball in the NFL. Often he tries to make the big play instead of taking the yards that are available. Before he came out I was watching a USC game with some friends and the announcers were talking about Bush possibly being the number one pick. I thought it was odd that they would say that considering Bush wasn't even the best back on his own team. Lendale White took the bulk of the carries between the tackles and the hard short yards. However, if you watch C.J. Spiller, he understands how to carry the ball between the tackles and get what is available. That's why he'll have more success in the NFL as running back. Any opinion about how he blocks for his qb or receivers and other rbs? Does he come back and help a qb under the gun? I've asked those questions before, and haven't got an opinion yet. Blocking skill by a back - especially in today's one-back scheme - matters.
NoSaint Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 The problem with Reggie Bush is that he doesn't understand how to carry the ball in the NFL. Often he tries to make the big play instead of taking the yards that are available. Before he came out I was watching a USC game with some friends and the announcers were talking about Bush possibly being the number one pick. I thought it was odd that they would say that considering Bush wasn't even the best back on his own team. Lendale White took the bulk of the carries between the tackles and the hard short yards. However, if you watch C.J. Spiller, he understands how to carry the ball between the tackles and get what is available. That's why he'll have more success in the NFL as running back. But thats the thing -- his ability to produce that big play, makes everyone around him better at there jobs. Its not something you want every down, but that explosive ability changes the game. Pierre Thomas and Bell were the grind it out backs last year. Bush was the one that "opened things up." Picture Jackson and Lynch filling that role, with Spiller hitting homeruns every game or two.
PDaDdy Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 Any opinion about how he blocks for his qb or receivers and other rbs? Does he come back and help a qb under the gun? I've asked those questions before, and haven't got an opinion yet. Blocking skill by a back - especially in today's one-back scheme - matters. I don't know if he is any better or worse than any other RB coming out of college. It would be silly to say that those things aren't great heads up savvy veteran qualities but he is a RUNNING back!!!! His primary jobs are running the ball, catching the ball and being a special teams ace until he proves to valuable to risk using in that role. You wonder why people think you have an axe to grind? It could be because you are casting doubt and focusing on the minutia and not on what he overwhelmingly brings to the table. Yes those things are important. To make sure you didn't miss that, YES those things are important but the skills you mention are not even in the top 5 things I look for in a RB.
BillsFanInLV Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 The Spiller pick is already resignating throughout the Bills RB corps. Jackson (a guy that has ALWAYS been underestimated) is already looking to 'prove' his worth. His heart as well as ability will only elevate his play. Lynch has already spoken on how he wants to "restore his reputation" as a viable NFL back. This should also increase his game (or be the final nail in his coffin if he doesn't live up to it.) Because all three backs posess different skill sets, I believe there will be specific down/distance scenerios that each are used. In comparing to Bush........Bell, Thomas, Bush and McCallister all thrived at different points of the season(s) ----Granted, we don't have Brees behind center but an intelligent use of each back is the point being made.
NoSaint Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 The Spiller pick is already resignating throughout the Bills RB corps. Jackson (a guy that has ALWAYS been underestimated) is already looking to 'prove' his worth. His heart as well as ability will only elevate his play. Lynch has already spoken on how he wants to "restore his reputation" as a viable NFL back. This should also increase his game (or be the final nail in his coffin if he doesn't live up to it.) Because all three backs posess different skill sets, I believe there will be specific down/distance scenerios that each are used. In comparing to Bush........Bell, Thomas, Bush and McCallister all thrived at different points of the season(s) ----Granted, we don't have Brees behind center but an intelligent use of each back is the point being made. It also allows you to gameplan for the defense better -- small and quick? pound marshawn. Big thumpers, let spiller out run them. It takes pressure off the qb to have the 3 skill sets available. if a defense is well suited to stop one style, you have other alternatives instead of putting it all on the qbs shoulders.
PDaDdy Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 It also allows you to gameplan for the defense better -- small and quick? pound marshawn. Big thumpers, let spiller out run them. It takes pressure off the qb to have the 3 skill sets available. if a defense is well suited to stop one style, you have other alternatives instead of putting it all on the qbs shoulders. What does Jackson bring to the table again? We know it's not TDs
NoSaint Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 Also -- Reggie in the playoffs -- i think its 5 games? 5 touchdowns. Rushing: 33 ATT - 188 YDS - 5.6 YPC - 2 TD Receiving: 20 REC - 249 YDS - 12.4 YPC - 2 TD Returning: 10 RET - 144 YDS - 14.4 YPR- 1 TD Looks like 2 returns, 6 carries, 4 receptions, about 90 yards from scrimmage and 30 return yards, 1 td per game averaged. He is also considered the best of the blockers in the backfield. If Spiller can on a semi regular basis put those numbers up, I am more then happy
NoSaint Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 What does Jackson bring to the table again? We know it's not TDs Honestly, hes a strong versatile back that is well suited to run with either. I would compare him to Pierre Thomas if we are sticking with the NO backfield. Maybe not the greatest at any one aspect, but right up there in all dimensions. Probably get the bulk of the work week in and week out with the other two coming in situationally to dictate to a defense.
Mickey Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 Why is Chris Johnson any better than Reggie Bush? They're the same size? Who knows...maybe it's heart. Why can't that big guy I saw in the supermarket the other day play center for us? He's the exact same size as Nick Mangold? Really, I can't imagine any team not wanting a guy with Spiller's talent and character on the roster. Sure, you can argue that we needed other guys more than CJ. But how can you be disappointed in having Spiller? Joe Cribbs only faster, stronger and with a better attitude. Nothing is a gurantee but chances are as good as were are going to get that this guy will warm up that cold scoreboard at the Ralph. Then again, I even like the Levi Brown pick so I guess no one should listen to me. I think its always a good idea to have a developmental type QB on the roster.
RealityCheck Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 For all the negativity on this board I am surprised that more people are not concerned like me that spiller will be just another reggie bush. Bush demonstrated that smallish fast rbs who need open spaces may not seem so fast or elusive at all at the next level. Bush was considered a once in a generation player coming out of college. Instant offense. A cant miss prospect So much so that the texans were ridiculed at levels not seen before or since for picking a franchise defensive end ahead of bush. What could bush get in a trade today. A fourth? Before last year anyone would have taken lynch over bush straight up. Can someone explain why spiller will be better than bush so I feel better about this pick and the season. What exactly happened that makes Spiller predestined to be identical to Reggie Bush?
Bill from NYC Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 Roscoe Parrish and Bush/Spiller shouldn't even be mentioned in the same paragraph much less in the same sentence like I just did. I am trying to entertain this as a serious question but when you start throwing in Roscoe Parrish you are reaching to unsuccessfully try to make a point. Chris Johnson and Reggie Bush are more the options for what Spiller could become and will be used for. They are all built the same. But Spiller is a better WR like Bush and he has sub 4.3 speed like Chris Johnson. I hope you are right, but my point was that building a team as such leads to failure. If you think that despite the Bills failures, small skill palyers are the way to build a franchise, perhaps we should agree to disagree.
thewildrabbit Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 If all the Bills needed was a great 3rd down back like Bush...
billsfan89 Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 Well from what he did out of college Spiller had less talent around him and carried the ball much more between the tackles. Spiller and Bush were both game breaking returners and receivers BUT Bush wasn't a between the tackles runner coming out of college while Spiller is considered a between the tackles runner at least somewhat out of college. All in all I think Spiller is a much more complete player then Bush coming out of college. Hopefully Lynch achieves his potential as a power back then we have a nice thunder and lighting combo with him and Spiller.
stuckincincy Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 Really, I can't imagine any team not wanting a guy with Spiller's talent and character on the roster. Sure, you can argue that we needed other guys more than CJ. But how can you be disappointed in having Spiller? Joe Cribbs only faster, stronger and with a better attitude. Nothing is a gurantee but chances are as good as were are going to get that this guy will warm up that cold scoreboard at the Ralph. Then again, I even like the Levi Brown pick so I guess no one should listen to me. I think its always a good idea to have a developmental type QB on the roster. I also like to have a developmental qb on the roster. The two game day roster chaps better get it done. If they can't , the young Mr. Spiller has to get used to his body being riddled with cleat marks.
mob16151 Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 I'll gladly take a guy(spiller) with 21 career touchdowns of 50 yards or more in his college career.
Recommended Posts