Alaska Darin Posted December 1, 2004 Posted December 1, 2004 I like the prospects of getting Dallas Clark for Henry, since the colts have Pollard and won't have enough money to resign the Edge. 141556[/snapback] Polian would NEVER swing that deal. Not in a million years.
The Jokeman Posted December 1, 2004 Posted December 1, 2004 Polian would NEVER swing that deal. Not in a million years. 141604[/snapback] There's even a question if Donahoe would swing it as let's not forget we took McGahee and passed on Clark (who went 1 pick later). Not to mention I don't see Donahoe trading Henry to a Conference rival. If Henry's traded anywhere this offseason I think Seattle and Arizona be the team's I'd consider moving him to the most.
DreamOnDan Posted December 1, 2004 Posted December 1, 2004 Either way, the point that I was trying to make is why not trade Henry for a starting TE instead of trading him for a 4th rd pick. If I was a GM and I didn't have a rb but had 2 good Te I would gladly take a player of Henry's caliber to play rb. I'm not asking for Tony G or Todd Heap, Just a Dallas Clark or Marcus Pollard...Doug Jolley...LJ Smith or Chad Lewis The fact is that we need a OL and a TE so why draft a tim Euhus in the 4th rd when you might be able to trade Henry for a LJ Smith? I'll take Barrett Robbins
Guest Guest Posted December 1, 2004 Posted December 1, 2004 Keep in mind Burns has a better per carry average than Willis and Travis
Recommended Posts