ndirish1978 Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 If we end up getting either Gaither or Brown for the left side how much of a disaster are we? Levitre: Started all 16 and was NFL all rookie team Hangartner: was solid and stared all 16 games (PS this is one center not overpaid for what he can do only making 10 mil over 4 yrs, hell not much more than fowler made) Wood: this guy is nasty as long as he comes back healthy RT: only "weak spot"..who knows maybe green can be good enough anyways we have two young guys in the interior who can get the job done and if you add a stud LT this line is going to be a lot better than just a disaster... +1 Coach Tuesday's analysis is terrible. The inside of our line is set and it's a darn good one too if Wood can return to form. We are very weak at T. Nonetheless, a trade a a legitimate starter turns what would have been a below average starter (Bell/Wang) into a pretty decent backup. The OL is 2 players away from being a strength. 1 player away from being respectable.
LynchMob23 Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 As one poster already mentioned, look at the line that the Dolphins had with Gailey, as well as the lines that Nix helped assemble for Brees (and later Rivers). Don't forget, we still have minicamp, where they can take a look at the vets and see if they're a fit or not - and then decide to trade for / sign an adequate starter or stopgap.
DanInSouthBuffalo Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 Hangartner (average-to-below-average last year, but at least he has some experience) Totally disagree. I think he does a very good job, and this isn't saying much, but he's probably the best center the Bills have had since Kent Hull. He's not in Hull's league yet, but the Bills have had AWFUL centers since Hull retired. Hangartner is the best of the group.
JJBuffalo Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 +1Coach Tuesday's analysis is terrible. The inside of our line is set and it's a darn good one too if Wood can return to form. We are very weak at T. Nonetheless, a trade a a legitimate starter turns what would have been a below average starter (Bell/Wang) into a pretty decent backup. The OL is 2 players away from being a strength. 1 player away from being respectable. Completely agree.
ChasBB Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 Well, first of all, it's only football, so I'm not "terrified". Secondly, I like our guys. The silver lining to all the injuries is that lots of guys got valuable playing time and nothing beats real game experience in the NFL. I think we're going to be OK.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 SOUNDS LIKE YOU NEED TO JUST SWITCH TEAMS -- AS A FAN OF THE BILLS WE DON'T NEED OTHERS LIKE YOU THAT CALL YOUR SELF A FAN OF THIS TEAM AROUND !! HEY THE RAIDERS ARE IN NEED OF A FEW CRAPPY FANS WHY DON'T YOU JOIN THEM !!! Gotta love an all-caps response. DO YOU SUFFER FROM VOICE IMMODULATION?
billsfaningeneseo Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 Gotta love an all-caps response. DO YOU SUFFER FROM VOICE IMMODULATION? Also, I am pretty sure that the original quote was highly sarcastic. Inability to control voice plus inability to recognize sarcasm. The diagnostic? Someone who doesn't have a clue
metzelaars_lives Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 I know it's been re-hashed again and again, but I still can't come to grips with it. How on Earth is this offense going to do ANYTHING with the starting front-five looking like it is now? Assume no trade for Gaither (it becomes less likely each day). Your starting front-five looks like this: D. Bell (coming off of serious knee injury; wasn't strong enough or good enough before the injury) Levitre (solid but young) Hangartner (average-to-below-average last year, but at least he has some experience) Wood (coming off of serious leg injury; may not be ready for season) Green (old; sucks) Backups are Meredith, Wang, Hennessy, Calloway. Yikes. I fail to see how this unit holds up for one game, let alone an entire season. Very little talent, almost no experience, and ZERO depth. Is this coaching staff setting itself up for disaster? I understand that Rome wasn't built in a day, but they've done almost NOTHING to address what was the weakest (and most important) link heading into the offseason. I know the common refrain is that this team still ran the ball fairly well last year with the line in shambles, and that Gailey's playcalling and schemes will help make up the difference. Well, I'm calling B.S. on that argument. This team couldn't run a normal offense last year because it had no blockers. If I hear Gailey say during a post-game interview - even one freakin' time - that the offense wasn't able to be effective because the blocking wasn't holding up, then he will officially have lost me. There are no excuses. Either they have a plan, or they plan to fail. Really, look at this roster and tell me you're not terrified. Speak for yourself, moron.
Búfalo Blanco Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 I think Wood is the crushing blow. He was playing really good ball last year and with a full off-season of strength and conditioning, I think he was set to take big step this year. The tackles are what they are....terrible. There is little doubt that we will struggle with off-the-edge pass rushes and will likely have to keep a TE/RB back on most pass plays. Pass protection doesn't look promising, but if it weren't for Wood's injury, I'd at least feel comfortable that our running game (which I assume will be a big part of the offense this year) would be competent. I'd hope we have a lot of counters and screens* built into this playbook. It's going to be very interesting who (if anyone) steps up on the OL this year. One thing's for sure though, as weak as our 1st string looks, cross your damn fingers for no injuries or things will turn from ugly to comical really fast. *Speaking of screens...am I the only one who prays to the gods we can develop a good screen pass system again? I thought Marshawn would have been a great screen guy and now with Spiller....WOW! Watching old tapes of Thurman is like poetry in motion. This.... I agree completely with the screen passes and mentioned that in a thread a couple of weeks ago... Fred Jackson and CJ Spiller could run some fantastic screens and counters.... but it all depends on the line... Just like you stated, the OTs and Wood's rehab are the biggest concerns... At the end of the day, the questions on the OL, the daunting schedule the Bills have along with a very competitive division and the defensive switch to the 3-4 could be too much for a rebuilding team... 2011 (if there isn't a strike) may be the year this team starts climbing its way out... I'm on board with Nix thus far, but am still unsure about Gailey... Time will tell...
dpberr Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 The OL is a question mark like the rest of the offense. Have no idea how good or how bad they are. It's tough to spot any trends when all of us fans got a shot at playing OL last year due to all the injuries, plus you had 2-3 rookies starting on any given game day. I can't stress enough that continuity and coaching matters. Trading your LT, canning your OC, adapting to the no-huddle, then throwing that away when it didn't work, protecting three different quarterbacks, all with different throwing progressions and ability to read the defense and routes, canning your HC mid-season, plus all the injuries...it makes Fred Jackson's achievements last year look like weekly miracles. Last year was such an epic mess, and this team still won six games. I think that's a sign that the team has talent.
stuckincincy Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 [Automated Response] We suck. The coaching staff sucks. The players suck. We have no hope of ever winning a championship. Oh woe is me. Trap. Trap. Off-tackle. Trap again. BTW - nice write-up on Dermontti Dawson: http://news.cincinnati.com/article/2010050...helping+Bengals
tennesseeboy Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 its too early to tell. I'm not optimistic about the way the present regime is proceeding but I'm willing to see what happens on the field next year. Nine wins and I'll be ready to join the band. To quote Gailey himself, Show me the baby.
Bill from NYC Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 Speak for yourself, moron. Read his posts. He isn't a moron. We are fans of a team that was destroyed by Levy/Jauron, literally destroyed. The OL is very bad and this isn't new. Levy/Jauron blew chance after chance to build it up, choosing instead to draft a slew of defensive backs, and trade a damn good left tackle in the process. The Bills are going to continue to lose until they solve this issue. How much do you need to see to believe this?
CardinalScotts Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 Fred Jsckson averaged 4.5 ypc last season behind this line and its injuries and playing in a cracker jack offense DING! DING ! its the crappy quarterback(s)
profile Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 SOUNDS LIKE YOU NEED TO JUST SWITCH TEAMS -- AS A FAN OF THE BILLS WE DON'T NEED OTHERS LIKE YOU THAT CALL YOUR SELF A FAN OF THIS TEAM AROUND !! HEY THE RAIDERS ARE IN NEED OF A FEW CRAPPY FANS WHY DON'T YOU JOIN THEM !!! Guys seriously, this is a moderator's response in a tone I suspect as very tongue in cheek, and a sarcastic response to the OP's original post. I also don't share the OPs feelings, but I do worry about depth and who we have starting at LT, RT, C, LG and RG. OMG!!! we are all going to die!! Seriously... if these guys can come back from injury, stay healthy, and execute a decent scheme, the O-Line should be at the very least, serviceable next year.
ChanOverChin Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 The Bills will end up trading for Gaither or J. Brown before the season starts. That move will do wonders for their starting O-Line. I can forsee the following starters on the O-line to open the season: LT: J. Gaither (very big, strong, athletic, proven) LG: J. Levitre (strong, athletic, solid performer last year) OC: Hangartner (vet OC with lots of experience, can hold his own) RG: E. Wood (may be our best OL when healthy, very strong, tough, mean streak) RT: C. Brown or possibly Meredith or someone else (this is the potential problem position). When completely healthy, I think Gaither, Levitre, Hangartner, and Wood make up a very solid group. It's the RT position that I would be most concerned about at this point (as long as Gaither is acquired).
Jerry Jabber Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 The OL is a question mark like the rest of the offense. Have no idea how good or how bad they are. It's tough to spot any trends when all of us fans got a shot at playing OL last year due to all the injuries, plus you had 2-3 rookies starting on any given game day. I can't stress enough that continuity and coaching matters. Trading your LT, canning your OC, adapting to the no-huddle, then throwing that away when it didn't work, protecting three different quarterbacks, all with different throwing progressions and ability to read the defense and routes, canning your HC mid-season, plus all the injuries...it makes Fred Jackson's achievements last year look like weekly miracles. Last year was such an epic mess, and this team still won six games. I think that's a sign that the team has talent. You hit everything right on the head. Great post!
Dr. K Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 I know it's been re-hashed again and again, but I still can't come to grips with it. How on Earth is this offense going to do ANYTHING with the starting front-five looking like it is now? Assume no trade for Gaither (it becomes less likely each day). Your starting front-five looks like this: D. Bell (coming off of serious knee injury; wasn't strong enough or good enough before the injury) Levitre (solid but young) Hangartner (average-to-below-average last year, but at least he has some experience) Wood (coming off of serious leg injury; may not be ready for season) Green (old; sucks) Backups are Meredith, Wang, Hennessy, Calloway. Yikes. I fail to see how this unit holds up for one game, let alone an entire season. Very little talent, almost no experience, and ZERO depth. Is this coaching staff setting itself up for disaster? I understand that Rome wasn't built in a day, but they've done almost NOTHING to address what was the weakest (and most important) link heading into the offseason. I know the common refrain is that this team still ran the ball fairly well last year with the line in shambles, and that Gailey's playcalling and schemes will help make up the difference. Well, I'm calling B.S. on that argument. This team couldn't run a normal offense last year because it had no blockers. If I hear Gailey say during a post-game interview - even one freakin' time - that the offense wasn't able to be effective because the blocking wasn't holding up, then he will officially have lost me. There are no excuses. Either they have a plan, or they plan to fail. Really, look at this roster and tell me you're not terrified. Jerry H Christmas, can you guys just GIVE IT A REST?
Cynical Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 I know it's been re-hashed again and again, but I still can't come to grips with it. How on Earth is this offense going to do ANYTHING with the starting front-five looking like it is now? Assume no trade for Gaither (it becomes less likely each day). Your starting front-five looks like this: D. Bell (coming off of serious knee injury; wasn't strong enough or good enough before the injury) Levitre (solid but young) Hangartner (average-to-below-average last year, but at least he has some experience) Wood (coming off of serious leg injury; may not be ready for season) Green (old; sucks) Backups are Meredith, Wang, Hennessy, Calloway. Yikes. I fail to see how this unit holds up for one game, let alone an entire season. Very little talent, almost no experience, and ZERO depth. Is this coaching staff setting itself up for disaster? I understand that Rome wasn't built in a day, but they've done almost NOTHING to address what was the weakest (and most important) link heading into the offseason. I know the common refrain is that this team still ran the ball fairly well last year with the line in shambles, and that Gailey's playcalling and schemes will help make up the difference. Well, I'm calling B.S. on that argument. This team couldn't run a normal offense last year because it had no blockers. If I hear Gailey say during a post-game interview - even one freakin' time - that the offense wasn't able to be effective because the blocking wasn't holding up, then he will officially have lost me. There are no excuses. Either they have a plan, or they plan to fail. Really, look at this roster and tell me you're not terrified. The only position I am terrified of is LT. IIRC, Wood is on pace to be ready by the regular season (if not sooner). Both Wood and Levitre return to the OG (please, stop with the Levitre to LT nonsense. As Nix said, why weaken 2 positions), and Hangartner will benefit not having to deal with 2 rookies (not saying Pro Bowl, but he should be better than last year). If Green can produce on a level like Walker did when he has here, that will be an increase over what we had (combined) last year. It still will not be an elite line, but it should not be the bottom dweller like last year.
Recommended Posts