papazoid Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 http://blogs.buffalobills.com/2010/05/10/l...both-rank-well/ throw in spiller and it's a crowded backfield.
dave mcbride Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 http://blogs.buffalobills.com/2010/05/10/l...both-rank-well/ throw in spiller and it's a crowded backfield. Very interesting. It puts Lynch's 2009 season in a (relatively) new light.
papazoid Posted May 11, 2010 Author Posted May 11, 2010 Very interesting. It puts Lynch's 2009 season in a (relatively) new light. sure makes lynch worth at least a second round pick....nix is right in not just giving him away.
earthtobrint Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 That statistic appears to show which offensive lines were bad, rather than which running backs were good. Running backs with bad offensive lines get hit right away in the backfield and therefore will have more yards after contact. Just look at the teams of the top 10 rbs and bottom 5 rbs in that category in the profootballfocus link. Fans that like to credit the Bills offensive line for their "good run blocking" last season should take note.
Recommended Posts