John Adams Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 She's a disgusting pig on the outside AND on the inside. Isnt it funny Obama failed to mention before the election that he'd be packing the SC with far-left idealogues? And your support for the "inside" part is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WisconsinBillzFan Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 And your support for the "inside" part is? Her warped ideology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 She's a disgusting pig on the outside AND on the inside. Isnt it funny Obama failed to mention before the election that he'd be packing the SC with far-left idealogues? I try to ignore your tripe, but this is ridiculous. Your first statement shows your intolerance of anything even remotely outside your own ideology, and your second statement shows your stupidity. Crappy way to go through the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Kagan, Napolitano and Kevin James.... triplets separated at birth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WisconsinBillzFan Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 I try to ignore your tripe, but this is ridiculous. Your first statement shows your intolerance of anything even remotely outside your own ideology, and your second statement shows your stupidity. Crappy way to go through the day. 1)Have you seen her? 2)You dispute the fact that she's far-left and Obama claimed he would nominate "mainstream" justices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Her warped ideology. Do you need a lesson in how to post? If you're going to be insulting, try to provide support. For example, when I first called you a racist, I linked to your many anti-black posts as support. Now, when you say she's warped and disgusting, you can provide examples, unless you believe that we find your opinion alone interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WisconsinBillzFan Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Kagan, Napolitano and Kevin James.... triplets separated at birth? The Bills should consider Kagan as a situational run-stuffer. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WisconsinBillzFan Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Do you need a lesson in how to post? If you're going to be insulting, try to provide support. For example, when I first called you a racist, I linked to your many anti-black posts as support. Now, when you say she's warped and disgusting, you can provide examples, unless you believe that we find your opinion alone interesting. For starters she supprots banning the military from college campuses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Why do you need to be an astronaut, when you are already waaay out there? Free ride home Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 1)Have you seen her? 2)You dispute the fact that she's far-left and Obama claimed he would nominate "mainstream" justices. First of all, I don't care what she looks like. She's ugly. So am I. And if it weren't for ugly chicks, most of us guys would have waited a lot longer to lose our virginity. Second of all, if you're just now coming to the realization that Obama is a left-leaning president who is going to appoint left-leaning people to the Supreme Court, then I can't help you. Claiming that he would appoint "mainstream" justices means nothing because, again, Obama lives in the world of implied/inferred mastery. You make the mistake of believing that your idea of "mainstream" is the same as his, and then start crying when you find out it's not. While I get tired of hearing this, it remains true: elections have consequences. He's president. He gets to pick. Don't like the pick? Fine. But Obama has gone out of his way to provide more than enough material for which we can be critical of him. This isn't one of them. Nut up. Shut up. Add recognize the fights worth fighting. Here's a hint: this isn't one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WisconsinBillzFan Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Nut up. Shut up. Add recognize the fights worth fighting. Here's a hint: this isn't one of them. She's 50 years old. She'll be on the bench at least 20 years. This is a fight worth fighting. If we allow Obama to pack the courts with judicial activists our children will be the ones to suffer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 For starters she supprots banning the military from college campuses. So that's 1 reason. For someone you say is disgusting, I assume you have a lot more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WisconsinBillzFan Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 So that's 1 reason. For someone you say is disgusting, I assume you have a lot more. 2)DADT 3)She has never even been a judge before Just off the top of my head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Good graphic showing the current Supreme Court nominees and the votes that passed/denied them. http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/ju...gle+Feedfetcher I forgot that asshattery about Obama rejecting Roberts because of his "overarching ideology." What a douche. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 2)DADT 3)She has never even been a judge before Just off the top of my head. Her opposition to Don't ask Don't Tell is related to your first reason. She opposed military recruitment on campus at Harvard because of that stupid policy, which violated Harvard's campus rules it seems. (And no, I don't care to get into the specifics of Harvards rules but I am sure they have some uber-liberal statement about how you can't be discriminatory and have a campus organization.) That she has never been a judge is not a mark against her and maybe even you know it. So you're still stuck at 1 reason to oppose her. Keep trying. Your Klan bloggers aren't giving you enough ammo yet eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 She's not as liberal as the left wants or as conservative as the right wants. The President gets to pick the SC Justices. She's eminently qualified and should pass in a breeze but of course, the right will embarrass itself (again) and vote against her almost en masse. Setting up the left to do the same when some future Republican nominates a conservative judge. Isn't this fun? The RIGHT will embarrass itself again? Heaven forbid she made suggestive comments to Anita Hill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 The RIGHT will embarrass itself again? Heaven forbid she made suggestive comments to Anita Hill. Yes, the right will embarrass itself yet again. The left has had its turn and will in future (just as I wrote). This time it's your folk's turn to be stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Do we really need ANOTHER woman in the Supreme Court? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Do we really need ANOTHER woman in the Supreme Court? By woman you probably mean Jew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WisconsinBillzFan Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Her opposition to Don't ask Don't Tell is related to your first reason. She opposed military recruitment on campus at Harvard because of that stupid policy, which violated Harvard's campus rules it seems. (And no, I don't care to get into the specifics of Harvards rules but I am sure they have some uber-liberal statement about how you can't be discriminatory and have a campus organization.) That she has never been a judge is not a mark against her and maybe even you know it. So you're still stuck at 1 reason to oppose her. Keep trying. Your Klan bloggers aren't giving you enough ammo yet eh? You really think she's the most qualified person for the job? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts